Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-rz4zl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-26T17:08:08.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Weed Management Strategy and Planting Date on Herbicide Use in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

H. Michael Linker  and
Harold D. Coble
H. Michael Linker
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Box 7620, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Harold D. Coble
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Box 7620, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in 1987 and 1988 at two locations each year to determine how two weed management strategies and three planting dates affected the cost and amount of herbicide needed to control weeds in peanuts. Weed management strategies used for each planting date included preventive, which duplicated a standard grower program, or an integrated weed management system. The least expensive strategy depended upon weed species composition, weed populations and planting date. In all cases, the integrated weed management strategy required less herbicide (acid equivalent or active ingredient) than the preventive strategy.

Keywords

Peanut, Arachis hypogaea L.Integrated weed managementintegrated pest management

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 1990 , pp. 20 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1988. Weather and crops. N. C. Dep. Agric., Div. Agric. Stat., P.O. Box 27767, Raleigh, NC 27611.Google Scholar
2. Baldwin, F. L., and Santelmann, P. W. 1980. Weed science in integrated pest management. BioScience 30:675–678.Google Scholar
3. Bridges, D. C., Walker, R. H., McGuire, J. A., and Martin, N. R. 1984. Efficiency of chemical and mechanical methods for controlling weeds in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 32:584–591.Google Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1982. Weeds and their control in peanuts. p. 206–249 in Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Ed. Soc., Inc., Yoakum, TX.Google Scholar
5. Cardina, J., Mixon, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1987. Low cost weed control systems for close row peanuts. Weed Sci. 35:700–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Egley, G. H. 1984. Stimulation of weed seed germination in soil. Rev. Weed Sci. 2:67–89.Google Scholar
7. Hauser, E. W., Cecil, S. R., and Dowler, C. C. 1973. Systems of weed control for peanuts. Weed Sci. 21:176–180.Google Scholar
8. Ogg, A. G., and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327–335.Google Scholar
9. Shaw, W. C. 1982. Integrated weed management systems technology for pest management. Weed Sci. 30 (Suppl. 1):2–12.Google Scholar
10. Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1973. Periodicity of germination and emergence of some annual weeds. Weed Sci. 21:574–580.Google Scholar
11. Sullivan, G. A. 1988. Peanut production practices. p. 1–15 in Peanuts 1988. N.C. Agric. Ext. Serv. Publ. AG-331.Google Scholar
12. Walker, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A. 1982. Crop manipulation in integrated weed management systems. Crop Sci. 30 (Suppl.): 17–24.Google Scholar
13. Weathers, C. R. 1981. Summary of the farmers pest management services project in Chowan, Perquimans and Pasquotank counties 1979–1980. N.C. Agric. Ext. Ser. Publ. AG-280.Google Scholar
14. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., and Patterson, M. G. 1987. Economic assessment of weed control systems for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 35:433–437.Google Scholar
15. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., and Patterson, M. G. 1987. Economics of weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with herbicides and cultivations. Weed Sci. 35:711–715.Google Scholar