Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-tldsr Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-04T10:08:44.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Banded Herbicide Applications and Cultivation in a Modified No-till Corn (Zea mays) System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Allan G. Eadie ,
Clarence J. Swanton ,
James E. Shaw  and
Glen W. Anderson
Allan G. Eadie
Affiliation:
Weed Biol., Ridgetown Coll. Agric. Technol.
Clarence J. Swanton
Affiliation:
Weed Biol., Ridgetown Coll. Agric. Technol.
James E. Shaw
Affiliation:
Weed Biol., Ridgetown Coll. Agric. Technol.
Glen W. Anderson
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The acceptance of no-till crop production systems has been limited due to expected problems with weed management. Field experiments were established at two locations in Ontario in 1988 and one location in 1989. Band or broadcast applications of preemergence (PRE) combinations of high or low label rates of atrazine with or without metolachlor or inter-row cultivation, were evaluated for their effectiveness in controlling annual weeds in no-till corn. At each location, different herbicide and cultivation combinations were required to achieve adequate weed control. Corn grain yield was equivalent regardless of whether herbicides were applied as a band or broadcast treatment at all three sites. At two of the three sites, one cultivation combined with herbicides applied as a band was adequate to maintain weed control and corn grain yields. Selective application of herbicides in bands represented an approximate 60% reduction in total herbicide applied into the environment. The integration of a shallow post-plant inter-row cultivation combined with the soil conservation attributes of no-till, would enhance the sustainability of a modified no-till corn production system.

Keywords

Atrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminemetolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamidecorn, Zea mays L. ‘Dekalb 524’, ‘Hyland 2803’, ‘Pioneer 3790’ and ‘Pioneer 3902’Integrated weed managementreduced herbicide useatrazinemetolachlor

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 535 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1982. The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30: 164–168.Google Scholar
2. Brock, B. G. 1982. Weed control versus soil erosion control. J. Soil Water Conserv. 37:73–76.Google Scholar
3. Brown, H. J., Cruse, R. M., and Colvin, J. S. 1989. Tillage system effects on crop growth and production costs for a corn-soybean rotation. J. Prod. Agric. 2:273–279.Google Scholar
4. Buhler, D. D. 1988. Factors influencing fluorochloridone activity in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chandler, K. and Swanton, C. J. 1990. Effect of tillage on control of quackgrass (Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.). Proc. Quackgrass Symp., 1990, p. 135–150. London, Ontario.Google Scholar
6. Erbach, D. C. and Lovely, W. G. 1975. Effect of plant residue on herbicide performance in no-tillage corn. Weed Sci. 23:512–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Fawcett, R. S. 1983. Weed control in conservation tillage systems. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 38:67.Google Scholar
8. Field Crop Recommendations. 1988. Publ. 296. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. 99 p.Google Scholar
9. Froud-Williams, R. J. 1987. Survival and fate of weed seed populations: interaction with cultural practice. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds. 2:707–718.Google Scholar
10. Froud-Williams, D. S., Drennan, H., and Chancellor, R. J. 1983. Influence of cultivation regime on weed floras of arable cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:187–197.Google Scholar
11. Gebhardt, M. R. and Fornstrom, K. J. 1985. Machinery for reduced tillage. p. 242–254 in Wiese, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited Tillage Systems. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., No. 2.Google Scholar
12. Griffith, D. R., Mannering, J. V., and Box, J. E. 1986. Soil and moisture management with reduced tillage. p. 19–58 in Sprague, M. A. and Triplett, G. B., eds. No-Tillage and Surface Tillage Agriculture. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
13. Hairston, J. E., Sanford, J. O., Hates, J. C., and Reinschmiedt, L. L. 1984. Crop yield, soil erosion, and net returns from five tillage systems in the Mississippi Blackland Prairie. J. Soil Water Conserv. 39: 391–395.Google Scholar
14. Johnson, M. D., Wyse, D. L., and Lueschen, W. E. 1989. The influence of herbicide formulation on weed control in four tillage systems. Weed Sci. 37:239–249.Google Scholar
15. Kells, J. J. and Meggitt, W. F. 1985. Conservation tillage and weed control. p. 123–129 in D'Itri, F. M., ed. A Systems Approach to Conservation Tillage. Lewis Publishers, Inc. ?Google Scholar
16. Kenimer, A. L., Mostaghimi, S., Young, R. W., Dillaha, T. A., and Shanholtz, V. O. 1987. Effects of residue cover on pesticide losses from conventional and no-tillage systems. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 30: 953–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Klassen, P. 1991. Conservation tillage still on the rise. Farm Chemicals 154(1):49.Google Scholar
18. Koskinen, W. C. and McWhorter, C. G. 1986. Weed control in conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41:365–370.Google Scholar
19. Moomaw, R. S. and Martin, A. R. 1978. Weed control in reduced tillage corn production systems. Agron. J. 70:91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Nowak, P. J. 1983. Obstacles to adoption of conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 38:162–165.Google Scholar
21. Ontario Weeds Committee. 1988. Guide to weed control. Publication 75. Agdex 641. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
22. Sprague, M. A. 1986. Overview. p. 1–18 in Sprague, M. A. and Triplett, G. B., eds. No-Tillage and Surface Tillage Agriculture: The Tillage Revolution. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
23. Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5:657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Thomas, A. G., Banting, J. D., and Bowes, G. 1986. Longevity of green foxtail seeds in a Canadian prairie soil. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:189–192.Google Scholar
25. Williams, J. L. Jr. and Wicks, G. A. 1978. Weed control problems associated with crop residue systems. p. 165–172 in Crop Residue Management Systems. American Society of Agronomy, Publ. No. 31.Google Scholar
26. Witt, W. W. 1984. Response of weeds and herbicides under no-tillage conditions. p. 152–170 in Phillips, R. E. and Phillips, S. H., eds. No-Tillage Agriculture: Principles and Practices. VanNostrand Reinhold Publishing Co., Inc. Google Scholar
27. Wrucke, M. A. and Arnold, W. E. 1985. Weed species distribution as influenced by tillage and herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:853–856.Google Scholar