Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bvgqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T19:22:51.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rotational Crop Response to Repeated Applications of Norflurazon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. Wayne Keeling ,
Randy W. Lloyd  and
John R. Abernathy
J. Wayne Keeling
Affiliation:
Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401
Randy W. Lloyd
Affiliation:
Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401
John R. Abernathy
Affiliation:
Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn., Lubbock, TX 79401
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A long-term study was established to determine the effects of rate, application method, and repeated applications of norflurazon on soil persistence and plant injury for sorghum, corn, and wheat. Preplant incorporated (PPI) and preemergence (PE) applications of norflurazon at 1.1 (1X) and 2.2 kg ai/ha (2X) initially were applied in 1981. Subplots were retreated in 1982 and 1983. Rotational crops were planted each year from 1982 to 1987. Evaluations taken in 1982 (14 months after initial treatment) showed slight injury to wheat, sorghum, and corn from 1X applications and significant injury from 2X applications. Evaluations 1 to 3 yr after final application indicated that repeated applications, even at the 1X rate, increased norflurazon residues and rotational crop injury. At both 1X and 2X rates, PPI treatments increased norflurazon persistence compared to PE applications.

Keywords

Norflurazon, 4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyo)-3(2H)-pyridazinonesorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.)Moench.corn, Zea mays L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Corndissipationsorghumwheat

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 122 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Baumann, P. A. 1981. Adsorption, desorption, and mobility of fluridone and norflurazon in Texas High Plains soils. Ph.D. dissertation. Tex. Tech Univ., Lubbock.Google Scholar
2. Keeling, J. W., and Abernathy, J. R. 1983. Rotational crop response to fluridone and norflurazon. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:155.Google Scholar
3. Lo, C., and Merkle, M. G. 1984. Factors affecting the phytotoxicity of norflurazon. Weed Sci. 32:279–283.Google Scholar
4. Rahn, P. R., and Zimdahl, R. I. 1973. Soil degradation of two phenyl pyridazinone herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:314–317.Google Scholar
5. Reeves, J. D., Abernathy, J. R., and Gipson, J. R. 1983. Placement and exposure influence on efficacy of herbicides to nutsedge. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:51.Google Scholar
6. Schroeder, J., and Banks, P. A. 1986. Persistence of norflurazon in five Georgia soils. Weed Sci. 34:595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Schroeder, J., and Banks, P. A. 1986. Persistence and activity of norflurazon and fluridone in five Georgia soils under controlled conditions. Weed Sci. 34:599–606.Google Scholar
8. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide Handbook, 5th ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar