Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-ff9ft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T16:56:33.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preemergence Herbicide and Seeding Method Effects on Seedling Growth of Kentucky Bluegrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven J. Keeley  and
Han-E Zhou
Steven J. Keeley*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Han-E Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: skeeley@oznet.ksu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Turfgrass managers often desire to overseed thin areas during midsummer or late summer, but seeding desirable species too soon after a preemergence herbicide application can interfere with seedling growth. This study was conducted to compare the effects of three herbicides on Kentucky bluegrass seedling growth and to determine whether seeding method affects the interval before seeding can safely occur. Dithiopyr, prodiamine, and pendimethalin were applied to ‘Kentucky 31’ tall fescue plots in late April at 0.56, 0.84, and 3.36 kg ai/ha, respectively. At 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 wk after treatment, soil cores were extracted from each plot, the existing turf was killed, and the cores were either broadcast seeded or slit seeded with Kentucky bluegrass. Slit seeding resulted in greater and more extended seedling growth suppression than broadcast seeding for all herbicides. Prodiamine suppressed Kentucky bluegrass seedling growth longer than dithiopyr and pendimethalin. Unacceptable seedling growth suppression occurred unless broadcast seeding was delayed for about 6, 8, and 14 wk after dithiopyr, pendimethalin, and prodiamine application, respectively. The required interval between herbicide application and slit seeding was approximately 11, 10, and 16 wk, respectively. Use of dithiopyr or pendimethalin rather than prodiamine and broadcast seeding instead of slit seeding allows earlier overseeding with Kentucky bluegrass.

Keywords

DithiopyrpendimethalinprodiamineKentucky bluegrass, Poa pratensis L. # POAPR ‘Unique’tall fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb. # FESAR ‘Kentucky 31’Broadcast seedingoverseedingseeding intervalslit seedingvertical mowingWATweeks after treatment

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 43 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Branham, B. E. and Rieke, P. E. 1986. Effects of turf cultivation practices on the efficacy of preemergence grass herbicides. Agron. J 78:1089–1091.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1987. Effect of core cultivation on preemergence herbicide activity in bermudagrass. Hortscience 22:440.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1997. Reduced herbicide rates for large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) and goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci. 45:283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J. and Bundschuh, S. H. 1993. Effect of dithiopyr timing on establishment of three cool-season turfgrass species. Weed Technol. 7:169–173.Google Scholar
Mcintosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J 75:153–155.Google Scholar
MSTAT. 1993. User's Guide to MSTAT-C. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. Pp. 919–936.Google Scholar
Puhalla, J., Krans, J., and Goatley, M. 1999. Sports Fields: A Manual for Design, Construction and Maintenance. Chelsea, MI: Ann Arbor Press. 26 p.Google Scholar
Yelverton, F. H. and McCarty, L. B. 2001. Tolerance of perennial ryegrass and Poa annua control with herbicides in overseeded bermudagrass. Int. Turf. Soc. Res. J 9:1050–1055.Google Scholar