Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T09:12:47.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preemergence and Postemergence Control of Japanese Stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Caren A. Judge ,
Joseph C. Neal  and
Jeffrey F. Derr
Caren A. Judge*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, Box 7609, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Joseph C. Neal
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, Box 7609, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Jeffrey F. Derr
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Hampton Roads Agriculture Research and Extension Center, 1444 Diamond Springs Road, Virginia Beach, VA 23455-3315
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: caschmid@unity.ncsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) herbicides registered for large crabgrass control were evaluated for control of Japanese stiltgrass, an invasive, nonnative C4 annual grass. Benefin plus oryzalin, dithiopyr, isoxaben plus trifluralin, oryzalin, oxadiazon, pendimethalin, prodiamine, or trifluralin applied PRE controlled Japanese stiltgrass 87% or greater 8 wk after treatment. Benefin plus trifluralin, metolachlor, or napropamide applied PRE were less effective (78, 39, and 59% control, respectively). Single POST applications of clethodim, fenoxaprop-P, fluazifop-P, or sethoxydim controlled Japanese stiltgrass 50 to 88%. These herbicides applied twice provided 82 to 99% control. Single POST applications of glufosinate controlled Japanese stiltgrass 82 to 85%, whereas two applications provided complete control. Single POST applications of glyphosate were just as effective as two applications in controlling Japanese stiltgrass. Dithiopyr, MSMA, and quinclorac applied POST were ineffective on Japanese stiltgrass. All PRE and POST herbicides tested were equally or more effective on Japanese stiltgrass than on large crabgrass, with the exception of metolachlor applied PRE and dithiopyr or quinclorac applied POST.

Keywords

Benefinclethodimdithiopyrfenoxaprop-Pfluazifop-PglufosinateglyphosateisoxabenmetolachlorMSMAnapropamideoryzalinoxadiazonpendimethalinprodiaminequincloracsethoxydimtrifluralinJapanese stiltgrass, Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus # MCGVMlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAAnnual jewgrassbamboograssflexible sesagrassinvasive plantJapanese grassMary's grassNepalese browntopDAT, days after treatmentPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceWAT, weeks after treatment

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 183 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2003. Plateau product label. BASF Corp.: Web page: http:// www.vmanswers.com/vmg%20labelsmsds.asp. Accessed: September 2004.Google Scholar
Barden, L. S. 1987. Invasion of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae), an exotic, annual, shade-tolerant C4 grass, into a North Carolina floodplain. Am. Midl. Nat 118:40–45.Google Scholar
Derr, J. F. 1999. Biology and management of microstegium, a relatively unresearched turf weed. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc 53:100.Google Scholar
Fairbrothers, D. E. and Gray, J. R. 1972. Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus (Gramineae) in the United States. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 99:97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gover, A. E., Johnson, J. M., and Kuhns, L. J. 2003. Pre- and postemergence control comparisons for Japanese stiltgrass. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc 57:28–33.Google Scholar
Horton, J. L. and Neufeld, H. S. 1998. Photosynthetic responses of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus, a shade-tolerant, C4 grass, to variable light environments. Oecologia 114:11–19.Google Scholar
Hunt, D. M. and Zaremba, R. E. 1992. The northeastern spread of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae) into New York and adjacent states. Rhodora 94:167–170.Google Scholar
Redman, D. E. 1995. Distribution and habitat types for Nepal microstegium [Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus] in Maryland and the District of Columbia. Castanea 60:270–275.Google Scholar
Senesac, A. 1994. Flexible sesagrass (Microstegium vimineum var. variabilis) control in shaded turf. in Weed Control in Turfgrass and Ornamentals 1994 Data Summary. Weed Science Research Report 10. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Pp. 40–41.Google Scholar
Tu, M. 2000. Elemental Stewardship Abstract for Microstegium vimineum. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy. Pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Winter, K., Schmitt, M. R., and Edwards, G. E. 1982. Microstegium vimineum, a shade adapted C4 grass. Plant Sci. Lett 24:311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, F. W. 1989. Control of Paulownia tomentosa and Microstegium vimineum in National Parks. A Report to The Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee. Pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Yelverton, F. and Hinton, J. 1996. Annual Jewgrass Control with Postemergence Herbicides. Turfgrass Research Report. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. Pp. 105–106.Google Scholar