Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T06:00:01.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Herbicide Application Method on Weed Management and Crop Injury in Transplanted Cantaloupe Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

W. Carroll Johnson III  and
Benjamin G. Mullinix Jr
W. Carroll Johnson III*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Services, Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA 31793
Benjamin G. Mullinix Jr
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Services, Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA 31793
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: cjohnson@tifton.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted at the Coastal Plain Experiment Station in Tifton, GA, from 2000 to 2003 to study the effects of herbicide placement on weed control and cantaloupe injury. Herbicides halosulfuron (0.036 kg ai/ha), sulfentrazone (0.14 and 0.28 kg ai/ha), clomazone (0.6 kg ai/ha), and a nontreated control were evaluated. Methods of herbicide application were preplant incorporated (PPI) under the polyethylene mulch before transplanting, posttransplanting over-the-top (POST-OTT), and posttransplanting-directed (POST-DIR) to the shoulders of polyethylene-covered seedbeds. Across all herbicide treatments, PPI and POST-DIR applications were the least injurious, with POST-OTT applications the most injurious. In general, sulfentrazone (0.28 kg ai/ha) was the most injurious herbicide and halosulfuron the least injurious, regardless of herbicide placement. Halosulfuron effectively controlled yellow nutsedge and provided versatility in methods of application, with minimal injury to transplanted cantaloupe.

Keywords

Clomazonehalosulfuronsulfentrazoneyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPEScantaloupe, Cucumis melo L.ClomazonehalosulfuronplasticulturesulfentrazonePOST-DIR, posttransplanting-directedPOST-OTT, posttransplanting over-the-topPPI, preplant incorporated

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 108 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Abbe, D. S. and Messer, C. S. 2002. Georgia Agricultural Facts. 2002 ed. Athens, GA: Georgia Agricultural Statistics Service. Pp. 50–53.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1998—Executive Summary. World Meteorological Organization Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project. Rep. 44.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2004a. Sandea product label. Yuma, AZ: Gowan. 20 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2004b. Spartan product label. Philadelphia, PA: FMC. 11 p.Google Scholar
Bonanno, A. R. and Lamont, W. J. Jr. 1987. Effect of polyethylene mulches, irrigation method, and row covers on soil and air temperature and yield of muskmelon. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci 112:735–738.Google Scholar
Boyhan, G. E., Kelley, W. T., and Granberry, D. M. 1999. Cantaloupe and Speciality Melons. Univ. Georgia Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin. 1179.Google Scholar
Doherty, B. A. and Mizelle, W. O. Jr. 2001. 2000 Vegetable Survey. La Grange, GA: Georgia Fruit and Vegetable Growers News. Summer 2001.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Bridges, D. C., and Brecke, B. J. 2000a. Response of seven peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars to sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 14:51–56.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Bridges, D. C., and NeSmith, D. S. 2000b. Tolerance of cucurbits to the herbicides clomazone, ethalfluralin, and pendimethalin. II. Watermelon. Hortscience 35:637–641.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 1994. Use of F6285 for weed control in peanut: efficacy and crop injury. Peanut Sci 21:65–68.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 2002. Weed management in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) transplanted on polyethylene-covered seedbeds. Weed Technol. 16:860–866.Google Scholar
Noling, J. W. and Becker, J. O. 1994. The challenge of research and extension to define and implement alternatives to methyl bromide. J. Nematol 26: (Suppl.). 573–586.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1999. Administration extends deadline on methyl bromide ban to 2005. Methyl Bromide Altern. Newslett. 5:1.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Culpepper, A. S., and Johnson, W. C. III. 2003. Response of squash and cucumber cultivars to halosulfuron. Weed Technol. 17:173–176.Google Scholar
Wells, J. J. 1999. Yellow Nutsedge Control in Summer Vegetables and Development of Glyphosate-tolerant Spinach. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR. 127 p.Google Scholar