Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T09:06:10.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control by Flufenprop-methyl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. D. Miller ,
J. D. Nalewaja  and
W. A. Olson
J. D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58102
W. A. Olson
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58102
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Postemergence applications of flufenprop-methyl [methyl-N-benzoyl-N (3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-2-amino-propionate] for wild oat (Avena fatua L.) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), durum wheat (Triticum durum L.), and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were evaluated in the field, greenhouse, and controlled environmental chambers. Wild oat control with flufenprop-methyl was greater at the five-leaf stage than three and one-half or two-leaf stage of growth. Wild oat control was not reduced when flufenprop-methyl was tank-mixed with bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-(4) 3H-one, 2,2-dioxide]. Tolerance of spring and durum wheat cultivars to flufenprop-methyl was acceptable; however, tolerance of barley cultivars was considerably more variable. Air temperature after treatment, soil fertility, and moisture did not influence wild oat control with flufenprop-methyl; however, a simulated rainfall of 1 mm within 1/2 h or 4 mm within 4 h after application reduced wild oat control.

Keywords

Triticum aestivumTriticum durumHordeum vulgarepostemergenceair temperaturesoil fertilitymoisture
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 91 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Kirkland, K. J. and Ashford, R. 1976. Benzoylprop-ethyl and its analogue for the control of wild oat in wheat. Weed Sci. 24:316–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1973. Wild oat control with SD-26624, SD-29761, and SD-29762. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 28:100–102.Google Scholar
3. Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., Pudelko, J., and Adamczewski, K. 1976. Wild oat control with difenzoquat. Abstr. No. 53. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., p. 24.Google Scholar
4. Niedermyer, R. W. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1974. Barban selectivity for wild oat in wheat. Weed Sci. 22:436–440.Google Scholar
5. Olson, W. A. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1977. Wheat and wild oat response to flufenprop-methyl. Weed Sci. 25:355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Stovel, F. R. and Bowler, D. T. 1972. Application of benzoylpropethyl and the effect on wheat yield. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 11 (1):278–280.Google Scholar