Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T11:16:07.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Peach Trees to Herbicide and Mechanical Weed Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jeff W. Daniell  and
W. S. Hardcastle
Jeff W. Daniell
Affiliation:
Univ. of Georgia Coll. of Agr. Exp. Sta., Georgia Sta., Experiment, Georgia 30212
W. S. Hardcastle
Affiliation:
Univ. of Georgia Coll. of Agr. Exp. Sta., Georgia Sta., Experiment, Georgia 30212
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicides and mechanical methods of weed control were tested on 1 and 2-year-old peach trees (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) on two soil types and locations. Several herbicide methods gave season-long weed control without detriment to growth or yield of peach trees. In general, a cultural system where herbicides were used in rows and 8-ft sodded strips maintained in row middles did not decrease the growth or yield of trees when compared to overall mechanical methods of weed control.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , March 1972 , pp. 133 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Chappell, W. E. 1964. Weed control in young apple and peach orchards. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 18:178–184.Google Scholar
2. Fisher, V. J. 1965. The effect of weed control by isocil and bromacil on growth of young peach and apple trees. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 86:148–151.Google Scholar
3. Lange, A. H., Crane, J. C., Fisher, W. B., Roberts, K. O., and Elmore, C. L. 1969. Preemergence weed control in young deciduous fruit trees. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 94: 57–60.Google Scholar
4. Larsen, R. P. and Ries, S. K. 1960. Simazine for controlling weeds in fruit tree and grape plantings. Weeds 8:671–677.Google Scholar
5. Lord, W. J., Flach, E. F., and Damon, R. A. Jr. 1967. Response of “Jerseyland” peach trees to three consecutive yearly herbicide applications of simazine and dalapon alone and in combination. HortScience 2:146–148.Google Scholar
6. Phillips, W. M. 1969. Dryland sorghum production and weed control with minimum tillage. Weed Sci. 17:451–454.Google Scholar
7. Ries, S. K., Larson, R. P., and Kenworthy, A. L. 1963. The apparent influence of simazine on nitrogen nutrition of peach and apple trees. Weeds 11:270–273.Google Scholar
8. Skroch, W. A., Sheets, T. J., and Smith, J. W. 1971 Herbicide effectiveness, soil residues, and phytotoxicity to peach trees. Weed Sci. 19:257–260.Google Scholar