Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:30:18.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Real-Time PCR as a Tool to Study Weed Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Wun S. Chao
Wun S. Chao*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Plant Science Research, 1605 Albrecht Boulevard, Fargo, ND 58105-5674
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: wun.chao@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR), also known as quantitative PCR, is used to determine relative gene expression or to quantify exact levels of mRNA in cells or tissues. Before the advent of real-time PCR, the major difficulty associated with traditional quantitative or semiquantitative PCR was to ensure that PCR reactions were quantified within the exponential phase of amplification. Real-time PCR alleviates that problem by detecting and quantifying fluorescent signals after each amplification cycle. Additionally, it does not require running gels and thus is able to produce data in 2 to 3 h. Four different types of chemistries, DNA-binding agents (SYBR Green), hydrolysis probes (TaqMan), hairpin probes (molecular beacons, scorpions), and fluorescent-labeled hybridization probes (Light Cycler), have been commonly used for real-time PCR. Among those chemistries, SYBR Green is the most economical choice. We have used real-time PCR and SYBR Green to examine the expression of a number of leafy spurge genes after growth induction and during normal seasonal growth. Because no reliable endogenous reference genes have been identified in leafy spurge, we performed PCR without an endogenous reference gene and analyzed messenger RNA (mRNA) expression based on the threshold cycle (CT) value of amplification. Excluding an endogenous reference gene from that data analysis was rather straightforward and reliable if RNA was properly prepared and quantified. Given that genomic tools, such as expressed sequence tags (ESTs), and their expression profiles are lacking for most weedy species, avoiding the use of endogenous reference genes in real-time PCR simplifies the optimization process and reduces the cost tremendously. However, we found that using a passive reference dye (ROX) to normalize non-PCR–related fluctuations in fluorescent signal is desirable.

Keywords

Leafy spurge, Euphorbia esula L. EPHESDormancyfluorescent chemistriesleafy spurgenormalizationreal-time PCR

Information

Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Science , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 290 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Adler, M., Wacker, R., and Niemeyer, C. M. 2003. A real-time immuno-PCR assay for routine ultrasensitive quantification of proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 308:240–250.Google Scholar
Ambion 2007. Real-time relative RT-PCR: how it's done. http://www.ambion.com/techlib/tn/85/857.html.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. V., Gesch, R. W., Jia, Y., Chao, W. S., and Horvath, D. P. 2005. Seasonal shifts in dormancy status, carbohydrate metabolism, and related gene expression in crown buds of leafy spurge. Plant Cell Environ. 28:1567–1578.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. V., Horvath, D. P., Chao, W. S., et al. 2007. Characterization of an EST database for the perennial weed leafy spurge: an important resource for weed biology research. Weed Sci. 55:193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Applied Biosystems 2000. Purpose of the passive reference, ROXTM dye. file://C:/Documents20and20Settings/Administrator/Desktop/PDF20files/Real-time20PCR/Purpose20of20the20passive20reference20ROX.html. Accessed: March 31, 2007.Google Scholar
Bustin, S. A. 2000. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 25:169–93.Google Scholar
Bustin, S. A., Benes, V., Nolan, T., and Pfaffl, M. W. 2005. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR—a perspective. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 34:597–601.Google Scholar
Chao, W. S., Serpe, M. D., Anderson, J. V., Gesch, R. W., and Horvath, D. P. 2006. Sugars, hormones, and environment affect the dormancy status in underground adventitious buds of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Weed Sci. 54:59–68.Google Scholar
Czechowski, T., Stitt, M., Altmann, T., Udvardi, M. K., and Scheible, W-R. 2005. Genome-wide identification and testing of superior reference genes for transcript normalization in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol. 139:5–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dauch, A. L. and Jabaji-Hare, S. H. 2006. Metallothionein and bZIP transcription factor genes from velvetleaf and their differential expression following Colletotrichum coccodes infection. Phytopathology. 96:1116–1123.Google Scholar
Foder, S. P. A., Read, J. L., Pirrung, M. C., Stryer, L., Lu, A. T., and Solas, D. 1991. Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis. Science. 251:767–773.Google Scholar
Ginzinger, D. G. 2002. Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: An emerging technology hits the mainstream. Exp. Hematol. 30:503–512.Google Scholar
Heid, C. A., Stevens, J., Livak, K. J., and Williams, P. M. 1996. Real-time quantitative PCR. Genome Res. 6:986–994.Google Scholar
Higuchi, R., Fockler, C., Dollinger, G., and Watson, R. 1993. Kinetic PCR analysis: real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Biotechnology. 11:1026–1030.Google Scholar
Huggett, J., Dheda, K., Bustin, S., and Zumla, A. 2005. Real-time RT-PCR normalization; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun. 6:279–284.Google Scholar
Jia, Y., Anderson, J. V., Horvath, D. P., Gu, Y-Q., Lym, R. G., and Chao, W. S. 2006. Subtractive cDNA libraries identify differentially-expressed genes in dormant and growing buds of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula). Plant Mol. Biol. 61:329–344.Google Scholar
Kaundun, S. S., Cleere, S. M., Stanger, C. P., Burbidge, J. M., and Windass, J. D. 2006. Real-time quantitative PCR assays for quantification of L1781 ACCase inhibitor resistance allele in leaf and seed pools of Lolium populations. Pest Manag. Sci. 62:1082–1091.Google Scholar
Kelley, K. B., Zhang, Q., Lambert, K. N., and Riechers, D. E. 2006. Evaluation of auxin-responsive genes in soybean for detection of off-target plant growth regulator herbicides. Weed Sci. 54:220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, M., Kuglitsch, R., Kwiatkowski, J., Frank, M., and Grossmann, K. 2007. Indole-3-acetic acid and auxin herbicides up-regulate 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene expression and abscisic acid accumulation in cleavers (Galium aparine): interaction with ethylene. J. Exp. Bot. 58:1497–1503.Google Scholar
Kubista, M., Andrade, J. M., Bengtsson, M., et al. 2006. The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mol. Aspects Med. 27:95–125.Google Scholar
Livak, K. J. and Schmittgen, T. D. 2001. Methods 25:402–408. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. B., Weis, J. J., and Wittwer, C. T. 1998. Quantification of low-copy transcripts by continuous SYBR Green I monitoring during amplification. BioTechniques. 24:954–962.Google Scholar
Saiki, R. K., Scharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., and Arnheim, N. 1985. Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science. 230:1350–1354.Google Scholar
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular cloning—a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.Google Scholar
Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W., and Brown, P. O. 1995. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science. 270:467–470.Google Scholar
Tyagi, S. and Kramer, F. R. 1996. Molecular beacons: probes that fluoresce upon hybridization. Nat. Biotechnol. 14:303–308.Google Scholar
Valasek, M. A. and Repa, J. J. 2005. The power of real-time PCR. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 29:151–159.Google Scholar
Vandenbroucke, I. I., Vandesompele, J., Paepe, A. D., and Messiaen, L. 2001. Quantification of splice variants using real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:68.Google Scholar
Veculescu, V. E., Zhang, L., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. 1995. Serial analysis of gene expression. Science. 270:484–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittwer, C. T., Herrmann, M. G., Moss, A. A., and Rasmussen, R. P. 1997. Continuous fluorescence monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. BioTechniques. 22:130–138.Google Scholar
Wong, M. L. and Medrano, J. F. 2005. Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation. BioTechniques. 39:75–85.Google Scholar