Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T11:06:30.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phytotoxicity of 2,4,5-T, Picloram, and Dicamba, Alone and in Mixtures in Tissue Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. W. Bovey ,
J. R. Baur  and
J. D. Diaz-Colon
R. W. Bovey
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agr., Agr. Res. Serv., and Dep. of Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
J. R. Baur
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agr., Agr. Res. Serv., and Dep. of Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
J. D. Diaz-Colon
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agr., Agr. Res. Serv., and Dep. of Range Sci., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The herbicide 2,4,5-T [(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) acetic acid], at concentrations of 10−4 and 10−6 M in nutrient media, was more inhibitory to the growth of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr. “Acme”) tissue culture than dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid) or picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid). Dicamba (10−6 and 10−8 M) and 2,4,5-T (10−8M) stimulated growth of soybean tissue. Mixing equimolar solutions of 2,4,5-T + dicamba, 2,4,5-T + picloram, or picloram + dicamba at 10−4, 10−6, and 10−8 M did not increase phytotoxicity over that of the most phytotoxic herbicide of the pair.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , March 1974 , pp. 191 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R.W., Davis, F.S., and Morton, H.L. 1968. Herbicide combination for woody plant control. Weed Sci. 16:332–335.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R.W. 1971. Hormone-like herbicides in weed control. Econ. Bot. 25:385–400.Google Scholar
3. Davis, F.S., Bovey, R.W., and Merkle, M.G. 1968. Effect of paraquat and 2,4,5-T on the uptake and transport of picloram in woody plants. Weed Sci. 16:336–339.Google Scholar
4. Davis, F.S., Meyer, R.E., Baur, J.R., and Bovey, R.W. 1972. Herbicide concentrations in honey mesquite phloem. Weed Sci. 20:264–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Diaz-Colon, J.D., Bovey, R.W., Davis, F.S., and Baur, J.R. 1972. Comparative effects and concentration of picloram, 2,4,5-T and dicamba in tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 27:60–64.Google Scholar
6. Meyer, R.E. and Bovey, R.W. 1973. Control of woody plants with herbicide mixtures. Weed Sci. 21: (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Scifres, C.J. 1972. Herbicide interactions in control of sand shinnery oak. J. Range Manage. 25:386–389.Google Scholar
8. Scifres, C.J. and Hoffman, G.O. 1972. Comparative susceptibility of honey mesquite to dicamba and 2,4,5-T. J. Range Manage. 25:143–146.Google Scholar