Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T05:05:10.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The physical cutting process of weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2025

Ziyu Li
Affiliation:
Ph.D Candidate, School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Minmin Wu
Affiliation:
Ph.D Candidate, School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Guanqun Wang
Affiliation:
Ph.D Candidate, School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Xiang Dong
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Mingxiong Ou
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Weidong Jia*
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
*
Corresponding author: Weidong Jia; Email: jwd_ujs@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article aims to further our understanding of the mechanics of physical weed control, specifically the mechanism of using a cutting blade to cut weeds. Research on weed stem cutting is sparse, so this paper draws on examples of plant stem cutting. It reviews the factors that affect the plant stem cutting process. Among the, Cutting speed, blade sharpness, and moisture content, factors that can easily be controlled, are discussed. The indicators for evaluating the cutting process and the methods for measuring the influencing factors are introduced as well. Finally, different blade designs, examples of the application of mechanisms that affect the cutting process of plant stems are provided. This review argues that, under conditions of high cutting speed, high blade sharpness, and high moisture content, plastic deformation would be reduced and the stems would exhibit brittle material characteristics. This would help to reduce the cutting force and energy, but excessive brittleness can cause stem fragmentation and degrade cutting quality. This paper also lists some possible future research directions. First, friction behavior during the cutting process of fresh plant stems. Another, cutting blade design based on the comprehensive application of cutting speed, blade wedge angle, and sliding cutting angle on the cutting process. At present, the mechanism of plant stem cutting process is still not clear. Further research is needed.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America

Introduction

The competition between weeds and crops has been present since the beginning of agriculture, and weeds continue to challenge crop production despite continuous management efforts (Hussain et al. Reference Hussain, Farooq, Merfield, Jabran, Jabran and Chauhan2018). Weeds can be considered as a type of serious pest of crop plants (Jabran and Chauhan Reference Jabran, Chauhan, Jabran and Chauhan2018). Both weeds and crops require appropriate light, water, nutrients, and space for their growth and reproduction, which means they will inevitably compete with each other and cannot coexist stably with crops (Little et al. Reference Little, DiTommaso, Westbrook, Ketterings and Mohler2021; X Yang et al. Reference Yang, Han, Cao, Li, Yu and Powles2021). Weeds also secrete substances that inhibit crop growth in order to compete for these resources. Weeds are also hosts for pathogens, which may lead to crop diseases (S Chen et al. Reference Chen, Memon, Shen, Guo, Du, Tang, Guo and Memon2024). The growth of weeds can be foreseen to have an impact on crop yield and even quality (Q Yang et al. Reference Yang, Yang, Zhang, Wang, Fu and Li2021; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Goncalves, Copeland, Qi, Dai, Li, Wang, Du and Thomas2020). Weeds can cause a 23% to 64% loss in crop yields (Guo et al. Reference Guo, Cheng, Long, Gao, Zhang, Chen, Pu and Hu2020a; Larue et al. Reference Larue, Goley, Shi, Evdokimov, Sparks, Ellis, Wollacott, Rydel, Halls, Van Scoyoc, Fu, Nageotte, Adio, Zheng and Sturman2019). Due to the low biodiversity of farmland and the lack of complex food webs, stability and lower resistance to invasion, making it difficult to prevent the invasion of weeds (Adomako et al. Reference Adomako, Ning, Tang, Du, van Kleunen and Yu2019). Therefore, weed control is an indispensable element of agricultural production.

The commonly used weed control methods currently include chemical, mechanical, and biological weed control (Memon et al. Reference Memon, Chen, Shen, Liang, Tang, Wang, Zhou and Memon2025). Biological weed control is neither direct nor stable, and is used less frequently. Spraying herbicides is the most widely used method of weed control, but excessive use of herbicides has also led to a series of problems (A Wang et al. Reference Wang, Li, Men, Gao, Xu and Wei2022). Herbicide spraying for weed control can pose health hazards to the workers. Excessive application can also lead to environmental and food residues, which in turn create environmental hazards and pose human health threats, including weed resistance, cancer, and endocrine disruption (Mei et al. Reference Mei, Hong and Chen2016; A Wang et al. Reference Wang, Li, Men, Gao, Xu and Wei2022; JW Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Zou, Song and Chen2018). Various methods have been proposed to reduce the harm caused by herbicides. Weed identification technology and variable-rate agrochemical spraying systems are incorporated into weed control machinery to reduce herbicide usage (Deng et al. Reference Deng, Miao, Zhao, Yang, Gao, Zhai and Zhao2025; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Abbas and Noor2021; Pei et al. Reference Pei, Sun, Huang, Zhang, Sheng and Zhang2022; Tao and Wei Reference Tao and Wei2024; Y Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhang, Ma, Du, Shaheen and Mao2021); herbicide-resistant crops are bred and cultivated to reduce herbicide damage to crops (Guo et al. Reference Guo, Cheng, Long, Gao, Zhang, Chen, Pu and Hu2020a, Reference Guo, Liu, Long, Gao, Zhang, Chen, Pu and Hu2022; F Wang et al. Reference Wang, Xu, Li, Chen, Wang, Fan, Tao, Jiang, Zhu and Yang2021); ultrasonic cleaning is used to remove herbicide residues from food (Alenyorege et al. Reference Alenyorege, Ma, Ayim and Zhou2018); and bacterial strains of rhizobia are used to degrade herbicide residues in soil (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Gao, Shi, Li, Fan, Yang, Wang, Tong and Li2023). This significantly increases the overall cost of weeding and makes reducing herbicide harm more complex and difficult. Even so, there is no comprehensive system to address herbicide hazards. In summary, mechanical weed control is a sustainable and environmentally friendly weed management method (Zheng et al. Reference Zheng, Zhao, Fu, Tan, Zhai and Chen2025).

Mechanical weed control is an effective weed management method for row crops and organic agriculture (Hussain et al. Reference Hussain, Farooq, Merfield, Jabran, Jabran and Chauhan2018). However, the challenge faced by mechanical weeding is to improve the effectiveness of weeding without harming crops (Zheng et al. Reference Zheng, Zhao, Fu, Tan, Zhai and Chen2025). Mechanical weed control techniques include, interrow and intrarow weeding (Memon et al. Reference Memon, Chen, Shen, Liang, Tang, Wang, Zhou and Memon2025). In intrarow weeding, tools are repeatedly applied to the spaces between plants within a row, while avoiding collisions with crops. To reduce blind spots during weeding while avoiding collisions between weeding components and crops, different weeding methods have been integrated into weeding machinery. Some of them use movable touch rods, while others use laser radar to detect the position of crops for obstacle avoidance. However, there is no need to consider obstacle avoidance when interrow weeding.

Weeds differ in shape and size. This paper will use the experience of cutting plant stems as a reference for cutting weeds. The stems of most plant conform to the characteristics of composite materials, in contrast to metal materials, which has been extensively studied in cutting process (Du et al. Reference Du, Hu and Buttar2020; Shen et al. Reference Shen, Li, Tian, Zhang, Huang and Chen2015; Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Tang and Chen2022; Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Li, Shen, Tian, Zhang and Huang2016). Most plants have a fibrous structure, which means that they can bear large tensile stress along the direction of the fibers (Fortea-Verdejo et al. Reference Fortea-Verdejo, Bumbaris, Burgstaller, Bismarck and Lee2017). However, the binding force between the fibers of plants is very weak, so many plants are anisotropic materials, which are different from metal materials (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Tang, Wang and Li2022). Therefore, even with the simplest blade, cutting is still an extremely complex process (Szymanek Reference Szymanek2007).

W Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Lv and Yi2022a) make the point that the stress–strain process of cutting plant stems can be divided into three stages: elastic deformation, plastic deformation, and shear failure. First, the cutter squeezes the stem, causing it to sag and produce bending elastic deformation. Then, with continued compression, plastic deformation is produced and the fiber tensile stress keeps increasing, and the fibers near the blade break and fail. Finally, the whole fiber layer slips and fractures, resulting in the shear failure of the whole stem. Igathinathane et al. (Reference Igathinathane, Womac and Sokhansanj2010) divided the force-displacement curve recorded during a stem-cutting test into five different regions that can be seen in Figure 1. In the first part, the blade edge compresses the stem and deforms it, accumulating strain energy in the stem. In the second part, the blade penetrates the compressed fibers of the outer skin and begins cutting. In the third part, the blade starts passing through the axis of the stem and cut pith fibers, which further reduces cutting resistance. In the fourth part, the cutting of the bottom stem and skin begins, as the stem and skin are harder than pith fibers, resulting in a second peak in the force-displacement curve. In the fifth part, only the residual resistance provided by clamping and friction remains.

Figure 1. The force-displacement curve explaining the nature of cutting process (Igathinathane et al. Reference Igathinathane, Womac and Sokhansanj2010).

Factors That Affect the Cutting Process

The factors that affect the cutting process can be divided into the characteristics of the stem of cutting object and those of the cutting tool. The stem characteristics include moisture content, Poisson’s ratio, elastic modulus, degree of maturity, density, and diameter (Qian et al. Reference Qian, Ma, Xu, Li, Wang, Yang and Wang2024; Rabbani et al. Reference Rabbani, Sohraby, Gholami, Jaliliantabar and Waismorady2015; Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Tang and Chen2022). The cutting tool characteristics include cutting speed, sliding cutting angle, and wedge angle. In the cutting process, the mechanical properties of different kinds of stems vary. Even the same kind of stem has different mechanical properties due to factors such as crop maturity, moisture content, planting location, and so on (He et al. Reference He, Ding, Du, Li, Ji, Li and Zhang2020). Therefore, some factors that are easy to control and have a significant impact are listed in the following sections.

Cutting Speed

Cutting speed is the core factor that affects the cutting process and is the easiest to control in cutting operations. With the increase of strain rate from 10−8 s−1 to greater than 107 s−1, the material response can be divided into three sections: static response, quasi-static response, and dynamic response (B Wang et al. Reference Wang, Liu, Cai, Luo, Ma, Song and Xiong2021). These responses of a material under different loading conditions represent different mechanical properties (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Liu, Su, Song and Ai2015). Achieving a strictly static cutting response is generally impractical. Cutting at a speed to obtain a quasi-static response can be termed “quasi-static cutting” (Kamandar et al. Reference Kamandar, Massah and Khanali2018). With the speed to obtain dynamic response, the cutting experiment is used to measure the values and predict the deformation as well as failure process of materials during actual operation (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Liu, Su, Song and Ai2015), which can be termed “impact cutting.”

Quasi-static Cutting

Increasing the strain rate can enhance the strength of a material (Melkote et al. Reference Melkote, Grzesik, Outeiro, Rech, Schulze, Attia, Arrazola, M’Saoubi and Saldana2017; Sirigiri et al. Reference Sirigiri, Gudiga, Gattu, Suneesh and Buddaraju2022). To reduce the influence of cutting speed on the physical properties and obtain the physical properties of the stem at static state, the quasi-static cutting should be selected. As shown in Figure 2, during quasi-static cutting, ultimate cutting stress and specific cutting energy decrease as the cutting speed increases (Rabbani et al. Reference Rabbani, Sohraby, Gholami, Jaliliantabar and Waismorady2015; Song et al. Reference Song, Zhou, Jia, Xu, Zhang, Shi and Hu2022a; Y Wang et al. Reference Wang, Yang, Zhao, Liu, Ma, He, Zhang and Xu2020; Wu et al. Reference Wu, Guan, Tang, Chen, Luo and Xie2009). It is considered that with an increase in cutting speed, the compression process of the stem would be reduced, and the point where the stem would be compressed would gradually exhibit elastic or brittle behavior (Dowgiallo Reference Dowgiallo2005; Song et al. Reference Song, Zhou, Jia, Xu, Zhang, Shi and Hu2022a). The reduction of the compression process and brittle behavior would contribute to reduced cutting resistance and energy consumption.

Figure 2. The effect of cutting speed on ultimate cutting stress and Specific cutting energy in a cutting test using sisal (Agave sisalana Perrine) leaves (Song et al. Reference Song, Zhou, Jia, Xu, Zhang, Shi and Hu2022a).

Impact Cutting

Brittleness is the property of a material breaking without plastic deformation when subjected to a force. The strength of materials increases with an increase of strain rate, including yield strength and ultimate tensile strength, while the toughness of a material decreases as the strain rate increases (Yang and Zhang Reference Yang and Zhang2019). When yield strength is greater than ultimate tensile strength in the cutting process, brittle fracture instead of plastic deformation would occur, leading to material embrittlement (Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Shimizu, Muroya and Eda2003). Even if brittle materials have high material strength, they will absorb less energy during a brittle fracture compared to fracture without material embrittlement. Mechanical response of materials under different loading conditions is shown in Figure 3. Ignoring temperature parameters, the strain rate is ranked in descending order as ${\dot \varepsilon _4}$ , ${\dot \varepsilon _3}$ , ${\dot \varepsilon _2}$ , ${\dot \varepsilon _1}$ . The dashed EDCBA represents the critical condition for material failure, which can be referred to as the fracture trajectory. The solid lines OA, OB, OC, OE represent the stress–strain curves at different strain rates, and the material fractures at points A, B, C, and E. According to the different characteristics of the material, the entire region is divided into elastic zone, stable plastic zone, and unstable plastic zone. The dashed lines OE and OD represent the critical conditions for material transformation. When strain rate increases, the stress–strain curve would transition from OA to OE, which means that the cutting resistance and material deformation would decrease (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Liu, Su, Song and Ai2015).

Figure 3. Mechanical response of materials under different loading conditions (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Liu, Su, Song and Ai2015).

Embrittlement or brittle behavior not only occurs in metal; plants can also exhibit brittle-like behavior during cutting processes. Xu et al. (Reference Xu, Zhang, Sun, Wang, Liu, Li, Guo and Li2016) found that the head and root of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cane with high water content presents the characteristics of a brittle material, while the middle of cane with low water content presents the characteristics of plastic material. Song et al. (Reference Song, Zhou, Xu, Jia and Hu2022b) make the point that during the cutting process, with the increase of cutting speed, the deformation of a plant changes from plastic to brittle. This change would reduce the resistance of crop materials to the blade and the cutting energy consumption.

Stress and strain states propagate in the form of waves, which are stress waves. During the loading process, the propagation and reflection of stress waves can lead to material embrittlement (Yang and Zhang Reference Yang and Zhang2019). According to the propagation state of stress waves in materials, stress waves have different propagation modes, such as elastic waves, plastic waves, and viscoelastic waves. The propagation velocities of elastic waves and plastic waves are shown in Equations 1 and 2, respectively (Yang and Zhang Reference Yang and Zhang2019). Zhou et al. (Reference Zhou, Shimizu, Muroya and Eda2003) indicated that when the cutting speed is greater than the static plastic wave propagation speed v p, the plastic flow of the material decreases, and the material would be embrittled.

([1]) $${v_e} = {\left({{E}\over{{{\rho _0}}}}\right)^{{1}\over{2}}}$$
([2]) $${v_p} = \left({{1}\over{\rho _0}} \cdot {{d\sigma}\over{d\varepsilon}}\right)^{{1}\over{2}}$$

Here, v e is the propagation speed of elastic wave (m s–1), v p is the propagation speed of static plastic wave (m s–1), E is the Young’s modulus of the material (Pa), dσ/dε is the slope of the tangent line corresponding to stress point σp on the stress–strain curve, and ρ0 is the density of materials (kg m−3).

The propagation and reflection process of the compressive wave with a wavelength λ is shown in Figure 4. In Figure 4A, the compressive wave approaches the free surface of the sample; in Figure 4B, the incident compressive wave and the reflected tensile wave from the surface overlap and form a composite wave, while tensile stress appears in the overlapping area (blue part); and in Figure 4C, the composite wave is tensile, representing the critical state. Before the critical state, the stress on the sample is partially compressive; and after the critical state, the stress on the sample is completely tensile. In Figure 4D, the overlapping area and tensile stress gradually decrease; in Figure 4E, the incident compression wave fades, and the reflection process of the stress wave ends (Wang Reference Wang2011; Yang and Zhang Reference Yang and Zhang2019). The generation of composite waves contributes to embrittlement and fragmentation, so excessively high cutting speeds may reduce cutting quality (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Liu, Su, Song and Ai2015).

Figure 4. Mechanical response of materials under different loading conditions (Yang and Zhang Reference Yang and Zhang2019).

Liu et al. (Reference Liu, Fan, Cai and Wang2015) conducted an impact tests on titanium alloy, which is ductile material. Figure 5 shows the section of the sample and the stress field during the impact process. No plastic deformation was found in regions 1 and 3 of the section, indicating that the ductile material underwent embrittlement during the impact process. Simulation shows that there are significant tensile stresses in regions 1 and 3, indicating that material embrittlement is closely related to stress waves.

Figure 5. The section of the sample and the stress field during the impact process (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Fan, Cai and Wang2015).

Constitutive Models

A constitutive model is a mathematical model that reflects the macroscopic physical properties. It describes the interrelationships between specific continuous medium kinematic quantities, dynamic quantities, and thermodynamic states. The constitutive model reflects the inherent properties of a research object, which would vary with the specific object and motion conditions being studied.

The Johnson Cook model, or J-C model, is applied to forecast the behavior and failure of materials. The J-C model can reflect the interaction between material stress and strain under conditions of large deformation and high strain rate. Due to its simple form and less input in predicting material constants, the J-C model is widely used to predict the flow behavior of materials (Sirigiri et al. Reference Sirigiri, Gudiga, Gattu, Suneesh and Buddaraju2022). It can be applied also to predict the behavior of plant stems. On one hand, plant stems would also undergo plastic deformation until material failure and fracture during cutting and destruction, which is similar to the behavior of metals. On the other hand, plant stems also exhibit significant strain hardening effect and strain rate strengthening effect in the destruction process, consistent with the main factors affecting flow stress in the J-C model. Therefore, the J-C model can be used as a constitutive model for plant stem cutting (J Liu et al. Reference Liu, Zhao, Zhang and Zhao2020). The flow stress equation is shown in Equation 3.

([3]) $$\sigma = (A + B{\varepsilon ^N})(1 + C\ln {\dot \varepsilon ^ * })(1 - {T^ * }^M)$$

Here, σ is equivalent stress (Pa); ε is equivalent plastic strain; ${\dot \varepsilon ^ * }$ is the dimensionless strain rate; T* is the dimensionless temperature; A is the yield strength of sample with the influence of strain rate and temperature; B is strain hardening coefficient; C is strain rate hardening coefficient; N is strain hardening exponent; and M is the thermal softening coefficient. There are three parenthetical expressions on the right side of the flow stress equation. From left to right, they represent strain hardening effect, strain rate strengthening effect, and temperature effect, which can influence flow stress.

The dimensionless strain rate ${\dot \varepsilon ^ * }$ and the dimensionless temperature T* can be calculated based on Equations 4 and 5.

([4]) $${\dot \varepsilon ^*} = {{\dot \varepsilon } \over {{{\dot \varepsilon }_0}}}$$
([5]) $${T^*} = {{T - {T_r}} \over {{T_m} - {T_r}}}$$

Here, $\dot \varepsilon $ is strain rate; ${\dot \varepsilon _0}$ is reference strain rate; T is the temperature at deformation (C); T r is the reference temperature at deformation (C); and T m is the material melting temperature (C).

When cut, plant stems would not heat up significantly, and the stem temperature would be approximately equal to room temperature, that is, T = T r. When predicting the cutting process of plant stems, the J-C model can be simplified as Equation 6 (J Liu et al. Reference Liu, Zhao, Zhang and Zhao2020).

([6]) $$\sigma = (A + B{\varepsilon ^N})(1 + C\ln {\dot \varepsilon ^ * })$$

Because the J-C model does not indicate the failure of the material, the J-H constitutive model is proposed as better predicting the behavior and failure of brittle materials (Holmquist and Johnson Reference Holmquist and Johnson2011; Johnson and Holmquist Reference Johnson and Holmquist1994), which can also reflect the behavior of materials under large deformation and high strain rate conditions. The J-H model can be described by Equation 7.

([7]) $${\sigma ^ * } = \sigma _i^ * - D\left( {\sigma _i^ * - \sigma _f^ * } \right)$$

Here, σ* is equivalent normalized strength of materials (Pa); σi* is normalized strength of intact materials (Pa); σf* is normalized fracture stress (Pa), and σf* is not greater than σf*max; σf*max is a dimensionless fracture strength of sample; D is the damage factor of the material (0 ≤ D ≤ 1), and when the material is intact, D = 0. The dimensionless expression of σ* is shown in Equation 8.

([8]) $${\sigma ^*} = {\sigma \over {{\sigma _{HEL}}}}$$

Here, σHEL is the equivalent stress at Hugoniot elastic limit (Pa).

The expression of normalized strength of intact materials σi* is shown in Equation 9, and the expression of normalized fracture stress σf* is shown in Equation 10.

([9]) $$\sigma _i^ * = a{({p^ * } + {t^ * })^n}(1 + c\ln {\dot \varepsilon ^ * })$$
([10]) $$\sigma _f^ * = b{({p^ * })^m}(1 + c\ln {\dot \varepsilon ^ * })$$

Here, a, b, c, m, and n are the material constants to be determined; ${\dot \varepsilon ^ * }$ is the dimensionless strain-rate; p* is dimensionless pressure; t* is dimensionless maximum tensile strength. The expressions of dimensionless pressure p* and dimensionless maximum tensile strength t* are shown in Equations 11 and 12.

([11]) $${p^*} = {P \over {{P_{HEL}}}}$$
([12]) $${t^*} = {t \over {{P_{HEL}}}}$$

Here, P is actual pressure (Pa); P HEL is the pressure at Hugoniot elastic limit (Pa); and t is the maximum tensile strength of sample (Pa).

Wedge Angle and Sliding Cutting Angle

The sharpness of the blade is an important factor affecting the cutting process and has a significant impact on cutting force, cutting energy, cutting quality, and blade life (McCarthy et al. Reference McCarthy, Hussey and Gilchrist2007; Schuldt et al. Reference Schuldt, Arnold, Kowalewski, Schneider and Rohm2016). As shown in Figure 6, the wedge angle γ is the angle between the front and rear cutting surfaces of the cutting edge. As the wedge angle decreases, the sharpness of the blade increases (McCarthy et al. Reference McCarthy, Annaidh and Gilchrist2010). However, an excessively small wedge angle can lead to insufficient strength at the blade tip, resulting in cutting stability issues (McCarthy et al. Reference McCarthy, Annaidh and Gilchrist2010). One other factor that significantly affects the sharpness of the blade is the radius of the blade tip (Schuldt et al. Reference Schuldt, Arnold, Kowalewski, Schneider and Rohm2016). The blade would be sharper when the radius of the blade tip is smaller. Due to the significant variation in blade tip radius with blade wear in practical operations, this article will not discuss the impact of blade tip radius on cutting plant stems.

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of sliding angle (Song et al. Reference Song, Zhou, Jia, Xu, Zhang, Shi and Hu2022a).

During the cutting process, the sliding cutting angle is a crucial parameter affecting cutting resistance. The sliding cutting angle has been widely used in agricultural production related to cutting, and it is an important performance index of some agricultural machinery (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Tan, Tian, Zhang, Ji, Liu and Shen2023).

The sliding cutting angle is defined as the angle between the absolute velocity direction of the blade motion and the normal velocity direction, as shown in Figure 7 (Tian et al. Reference Tian, Xia, Wang, Song, Yan, Li and Wang2021), where V is actual velocity of blade motion, V n is normal velocity of blade motion, V t is tangential velocity of blade motion, and α is the sliding cutting angle. Angle α shall be between 0° and 90°, and when angle α is 0°, the cutting method is considered to be cross-cutting (Song et al. Reference Song, Zhou, Xu, Jia and Hu2022b).

Figure 7. Schematic diagram of sliding angle (Tian et al. Reference Tian, Xia, Wang, Song, Yan, Li and Wang2021).

Sliding cutting can effectively reduce the ultimate stress of material tension, tensile fracture, and shear failure (Qian et al. Reference Qian, Ma, Xu, Li, Huo and Li2023). Some studies suggest that a larger sliding cutting angle leads to lower cutting resistance (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Xu, Yu, Lu, Han, Chai, Wu and Zhu2023; Rabbani et al. Reference Rabbani, Sohraby, Gholami, Jaliliantabar and Waismorady2015; W Wang et al. Reference Wang, Wang, Zhang, Lv and Yi2022b), while other studies indicates that the relationship between them is not linear (Cao et al. Reference Cao, Yu, Tang, Zhao, Gu, Liu and Chen2023; Huan et al. Reference Huan, Pang, Li, Wang and You2024; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Ni, Liu, Hu, Zhang and Fu2024). An increase of sliding cutting angle would reduce the actual wedge angle of the blade, making the blade sharper and reducing the normal stress during cutting, which is conducive to reducing the cutting force. On the other hand, an increase of the sliding cutting angle would increase the cutting displacement of the blade and the length of the blade put into cutting work, which is not conducive to reducing the cutting energy. When the sliding cutting angle is small, reducing the cutting force in the cutting process has a greater impact on the total cutting energy than reducing the cutting displacement. However, when the sliding cutting angle is large, although the ultimate shear stress decreases, the cutting will consume more energy due to the friction resistance between the blade surface and the stem (Song et al. Reference Song, Zhou, Jia, Xu, Zhang, Shi and Hu2022a). This is essentially a comparison between two effects caused by reducing cutting angle, and the values of both sides change with the cutting object.

Moisture Content

Because the stem is considered to be a composite material composed of cells (Du et al. Reference Du, Hu and Buttar2020), the lack of water would affect the structure and the physical properties of the cells, thus impacting the physical properties of the stem (Rabbani et al. Reference Rabbani, Sohraby, Gholami, Jaliliantabar and Waismorady2015). Moisture content would have a significant impact on the toughness and strength of the stem and would greatly impact the cutting process (Cao et al. Reference Cao, Yu, Tang, Zhao, Gu, Liu and Chen2023; Tang et al. Reference Tang, Li, Zhang, Wang and Li2020, Reference Tang, Liang, Zhang, Wang, Zhang and Li2021). Moisture content is among the characteristics of the cutting object, the stem itself, but moisture content is relatively easy to predict and control in agricultural production.

The influence trend of stem moisture content on cutting resistance can be divided into two types. First, when the stem is fresh and the plant cells do not die in a large range during cutting, the cutting resistance decreases with the increase of moisture content (Chandio et al. Reference Chandio, Li, Ma, Ahmad, Syed, Shaikh and Tunio2021; Du et al. Reference Du, Hu and Buttar2020; Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Mahapatra, Behera, Pradhan, Swain, Rath and Sahni2023; Taghinezhad et al. Reference Taghinezhad, Alimardani and Jafari2013). Second, when the stem has been dried or the plant cells have died in a large range before the experiment, the cutting resistance increases with the increase of moisture content (Charee et al. Reference Charee, Sudajan, Junsiri, Laloon and Oupathum2021; Galedar et al. Reference Galedar, Jafari, Mohtasebi, Tabatabaeefar, Sharifi, O’Dogherty, Rafiee and Richard2008; Oyefeso et al. Reference Oyefeso, Akintola, Afolabi, Ogunlade, Fadele and Odeniyi2021).

The increase of water content would make the fresh plant cells fuller and would further increase the Young’s modulus of the stem. The increase of water content would also reduce the ultimate shear stress of fresh stems. In summary, increasing the moisture content would increase the brittle material characteristics of fresh stems.

Generally, there are several ways to dry plants, including freeze drying, relative humidity convective drying, infrared drying, microwave drying, and ultrasonic drying. All these drying methods would create a porous microstructure in the dried product and have great effects on plant cells and tissues (Guo et al. Reference Guo, Wu, Guo, Ding, Pan and Ma2020b; Osae et al. Reference Osae, Essilfie, Alolga, Bonah, Ma and Zhou2020; Rashid et al. Reference Rashid, Ma, Jatoi, Safdar, El-Mesery, Sarpong, Ali and Wali2019). The effects can be seen in Figure 8: the arrows refer to the pores and cavities caused by drying. Freeze drying can produce ice crystals in cells, resulting in voids in the cell structure and cell collapse. In relative humidity convective drying, the synergistic effect of temperature and relative humidity will make plants create micropores, and the dried product will be softer than the non-dried one (Xu et al. Reference Xu, Tiliwa, Yan, Azam, Wei, Zhou, Ma and Bhandari2022). Infrared drying and microwave drying will lead to irreversible cell rupture and destruction of cell structure, which will lead to the loss of plant tissue integrity and severe cell collapse (Osae et al. Reference Osae, Essilfie, Alolga, Bonah, Ma and Zhou2020; Wu et al. Reference Wu, Guo, Guo, Ma and Zhou2021). It can be determined that ultrasonic drying can change the five textural properties of the target: hardness, elasticity, cohesion, adhesion, and stickiness (Xu et al. Reference Xu, Tiliwa, Yan, Azam, Wei, Zhou, Ma and Bhandari2022). In summary, drying can reduce the material strength of plant stems by altering their cell and tissue structure.

Figure 8. Longitudinal microstructure of carrot (Daucus carota L.). (A) Fresh; (B and D) infrared drying; (C and E) ultrasound-assisted infrared drying (Guo et al. Reference Guo, Wu, Guo, Ding, Pan and Ma2020b).

Material Preparation and Test Methods

Plant cutting is a complex process that involves many variables. To measure whether a cutting process meets the indicators required by the operation, it is necessary to select some variables to characterize important characteristics of the cutting process.

The cutting process evaluation indices shown in this paper are ultimate cutting stress, specific cutting energy, and cutting quality. Ultimate cutting stress represents the maximum resistance received by the blade when cutting, and the cutting resistance is one of the core indicators of much cutting equipment (Tian et al. Reference Tian, Zhang, Ji, Huang, Liu and Shen2023). Because cutting resistance is affected by the diameter of the plant stem, the effect of diameter can be removed by using shear stress compared with shear resistance. Specific cutting energy represents the work done by the cutting system during the cutting process and the resistance of the blade in the cutting process. Similar to the ultimate cutting stress, specific cutting energy also removes the influence of diameter. Cutting quality is the evaluation index for the flatness of the section produced by cutting when harvesting crops, such as sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.), which can be seen in Figure 9. Improving the cutting quality can reduce the harvest losses and stubble damage rates of crops. Moisture content, which is an important physiological and mechanical index of plant cannot be used directly to represent the cutting process, but can indirectly affect the process by affecting the mechanical properties of plant stems. The moisture content of fresh plant stems can vary, but the variation range is small.

Figure 9. The sugarcane stubble damage condition: (A) undamaged stubble; (B) slight damage; (C) moderate damage; (D) severe damage; and (E) uprooting (Qian et al. Reference Qian, Ma, Xu, Li, Wang, Yang and Wang2024).

Ultimate Cutting Stress and Specific Cutting Energy

To calculate ultimate cutting stress and specific cutting energy, it is necessary to select the data acquisition instrument according to the cutting speed. To obtain a quasi-static response, the texture analyzer can be used for the cutting test, as shown in Figure 10A (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Wang, Ma, Wang, Du, Shi, Ni and Mao2022; Tang et al. Reference Tang, Liang, Wang, Zhang and Wang2022). The cutting displacement cutting resistance curve can be obtained with a cutting test using the texture analyzer; the ultimate cutting stress can be obtained using Equation 13, and specific cutting energy can be obtained using Equation 14. To obtain dynamic response, a pendulum-based cutting test setup or other homemade cutting test machine can be used. A pendulum-based cutting test setup can be seen in Figure 10B. The calculation of ultimate cutting stress and specific cutting energy is the same as that used for quasi-static cutting.

Figure 10. Test instruments: (A) texture analyzer and (B) pendulum-based cutting test setup.

([13]) $$\tau = {{{F_{\max }}} \over A}$$
([14]) $${E_p} = {1 \over A}\int\limits_0^s {Fds} $$

Here, τ is ultimate cutting stress (MPa); F max is the maximum force the blade received (N); A is the area of the section caused by cutting (mm2); E p is specific cutting energy (×10−3 J mm−2); s is blade displacement during the cutting process (m); F is instantaneous force received by the blade during the cutting process (N).

Cutting Quality

When measuring cutting quality, taking sugarcane as an example, if the crack on a stem stub exceeds one node of sugarcane or the stub is pushed down or pulled out, the stub should be considered damaged. If the section of a stem stub is flat and exhibits no tearing, the stub can be considered to be qualified stub. The damage rate for measuring cutting quality can be calculated according to Equation 15 (Qian et al. Reference Qian, Ma, Xu, Li, Huo and Li2023).

([15]) $${C_P} = {{{N_P}} \over {{N_A}}}$$

Here, C P is stubble damage rate (%); N P is the number of damaged stem stubs produced by the test; N A is the number of stem stubs produced by the test.

Moisture Content

Moisture content is an important physical parameter that needs to be measured using instruments. Many devices can be selected to assist in the measurement of moisture content. The use of hyperspectral technology is efficient and nondestructive and has been widely used in the measurement of agricultural products (Lu et al. Reference Lu, Sun, Yang, Wu, Zhou and Shen2018). However, to improve accuracy, the moisture content of the test points needs to be the same as that of the whole plant sample (Sun et al. Reference Sun, Tian, Wu, Dai and Lu2020). Hyperspectral technology is suitable for measuring the moisture content of smaller parts such as leaves, seeds, or slender stems (Lu et al. Reference Lu, Sun, Yang, Wu, Zhou and Shen2018; X Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Sun, Mao, Wu, Zhang and Yang2018). The use of a constant-temperature oven is accurate, but time-consuming, destructive, and cumbersome (Sun et al. Reference Sun, Tian, Wu, Dai and Lu2020). The constant-temperature oven would use convective air or infrared or microwave to promote the loss of moisture in plant samples and finally end the drying when the sample mass no longer decreases. The moisture content measured with a constant-temperature oven can be calculated using Equation 16.

([16]) $${M_C} = {{{m_A} - {m_P}} \over {{m_A}}}$$

Here, M C is moisture content (%); m P is the mass after drying (g); and m A is the mass before drying (g).

Weeding Blade Design

In mechanical weeding, the core goal has always been to improve weeding efficiency or weeding performance, which means the blade can cut weeds with less resistance and dragging. In summary, the core goal is increasing weeding rate and reducing weeding power.

There are many types of designs for cutting blades, include bionic cutting blade design and serrated cutting blade design. They all can achieve the goal of improving cutting performance but neglect the intrinsic design of the blade edge curve which bases on the force analysis and material mechanics (J Wang et al. Reference Wang, Wang, Li, He, Lu and Liu2021; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Wang, Li and Liang2018). Therefore, there are blades designed with equal sliding cutting angle to keep cutting resistance on blade constant; but these neglect the influence of speed on cutting resistance, as higher speed leads to lower resistance during cutting and impact (Song et al. Reference Song, Zhou, Jia, Xu, Zhang, Shi and Hu2022a; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Wang, Li and Liang2018), rendering such designs unsuitable for rotary mowers.

Bionic Cutting Blade Design

In recent years, the application of physiology as well as morphology in agriculture has been increasing. Different biological characteristics have been incorporated into the design of cutting tools based on observing cutting processes in nature and analyzing low-resistance, anti-wear, and anti-friction characteristics,. These characteristics are successful examples of the cutting mechanisms evolved by various organisms. This effectively enhances the performance of cutting tools and the quality of the cutting process (Yu et al. Reference Yu, Han, Zhang and Zhang2021). The use of bionics in agricultural components includes the design of openers, plows, and cutting blades to reduce resistance and power consumption (Tian et al. Reference Tian, Li, Zhang, Chen, Shen and Huang2017).

In bionic cutting blade design, the first step is to determine the required cutting blade features and the suitable bionic prototype. Especially for the blade design for plant cutting, the blades need to be low resistance and anti-friction. The material properties and cutting mechanisms of different materials vary from one another, and different bionic prototypes need to be selected according to the cutting object requirements (Yu et al. Reference Yu, Han, Zhang and Zhang2021). For example, the common pest Locusta migratoria manilensis, which mainly feeds on plants, has highly developed chewing mouthparts. The mandibles of the Oriental migratory locust are an important and efficient tool for cutting plants and a suitable bionic prototype (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Xu, Yu, Lu, Han, Chai, Wu and Zhu2023). Otidognathus davidis larvae feed on bamboo (Bambusa spp.), which has high strength and hardness. Bamboo weevil larvae can easily cut the thick, tough fibers bamboo. The cutting ability mainly comes from the larva’s sturdy and sharp mandibles and can serve as a good bionic prototype in the design of plant cutting blades (Tong et al. Reference Tong, Xu, Chen and Li2017).

It is necessary to extract features from bionic prototypes, usually insect mandibles or animal claws. First, observe and record bionic prototypes through scanning electron microscopy, 3D microscopy, or nano-computed tomography (CT) scanners. Then, extract contour data from raw images through image post-processing software (Moyer and Bemis Reference Moyer and Bemis2017; J Wang et al. Reference Wang, Guan, Gao, Zhou and Tang2020; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Ni, Liu, Hu, Zhang and Fu2024). In the end, based on actual needs, the extracted data should be reproduced on the cutting blade in a specific size. This can be the reproduction of the cutting part curve of the bionic prototype by the blade edge curve design in a two-dimensional perspective (Cao et al. Reference Cao, Yu, Tang, Zhao, Gu, Liu and Chen2023; Guan et al. Reference Guan, Fu, Xu, Jiang, Wang and Cui2022), or the reproduction of the cutting part curve of the bionic prototype by the blade specific design in a three-dimensional perspective (Li et al. Reference Li, Chen and Chen2016). The design process for a bionic cutting blade can be seen in Figure 11.

Figure 11. The design process for a bionic cutting blade inspired by Oriental migratory locust (Cao et al. Reference Cao, Yu, Tang, Zhao, Gu, Liu and Chen2023).

Serrated Cutting Blade Design

The design of serrated blade is a common improving design scheme for ordinary blade. A serrated blade design would not change the blade curve of the original blade design but would replace the original blade edge with a row of serrations.

The design of a serrated blade is similar to that of a saw. The serrations will produce local high-pressure points on the cutting object, which will produce cutting object failure (Gan et al. Reference Gan, Mathanker, Momin, Kuhns, Stoffel, Hansen and Grift2018). After the stem fails at high-pressure points, the displacement of serrations, which would already be embedded in the stem, would strengthen the tensile stress and shear stress of the blade on the stem. Because shear and tensile failure of stem fibers are the main sources of stem failure (Tang et al. Reference Tang, Liang, Wang, Zhang and Wang2022), strengthening tensile stress during cutting can encourage stem failure and reduce energy consumption (Gan et al. Reference Gan, Mathanker, Momin, Kuhns, Stoffel, Hansen and Grift2018).

There are many specific designs for serrations, including designs with triangular protrusions like saws (Mello and Harris Reference Mello and Harris2003; J Wang et al. Reference Wang, Wang, Li, He, Lu and Liu2021), designs with strip-shaped serrations (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Mathanker, Zhang and Hansen2012; Momin et al. Reference Momin, Wempe, Grift and Hansen2017), and designs that use the curve obtained from a bionic prototype as the blade curve at the serrated gap (X Chen et al. Reference Chen, Xu, Zhang, Tan, Ding and Tagar2024). A blade with strip-shaped serrations is shown in Figure 12.

Figure 12. Serrated blade design with strip-shaped serrations (Gan et al. Reference Gan, Mathanker, Momin, Kuhns, Stoffel, Hansen and Grift2018).

Equal Sliding Cutting Angle Blade Design

The influence of sliding cutting angle on the cutting process has been described earlier. To solve the problem of uneven force and large fluctuations on the blade during the cutting of rattan straw, an equal sliding angle cutting blade design has been proposed (Guo et al. Reference Guo, Zhang, Xu, Li, Chen and Wu2014). The equal sliding angle cutter not only reduces cutting power consumption and improves cutting efficiency but also extends blade life (Song et al. Reference Song, Zhang, Xie, Chen and Liu2024; Zheng et al. Reference Zheng, He, Li, Diao, Wang and Zhang2016).

As shown in Figure 13, a polar coordinate system is established with point O as the pole, and the blade rotates around point O as the center. When the blade curve AB rotates dδ, any point D on the blade curve would changes to point M, and vector r would become r′. Set dr as the difference between r and r′. When dδ approaches 0, arc MD can be regarded as a straight line, and the lengths of arc ND can be regarded the same as line MN. According to the definition of a sliding angle, in triangle ABC, the relationship between sliding angle τ and polar angle δ can be expressed by Equation 17:

([17]) $$\tan \tau = {{ND} \over {MN}} = {{rdr} \over {dr}}$$

Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the equal sliding cutting angle blade curve (P Liu et al. Reference Liu, He, Li, Li, Wang, Lu, Zhang and Li2020).

If the sliding angle is constant, the polar coordinate equation of the blade curve is shown in Equation 18).

([18]) $$r = C{e^{{\delta \over {\tan \tau }}}}$$

Here, C is constant.

The polar coordinate equation is a logarithmic spiral equation. In a logarithmic spiral curve, if any ray passing through the pole O intersects with a curve, the angle between the tangent of the curve at the intersection and the ray is a fixed value, which is the slip angle τ. Therefore, the equal sliding angle blade can also be referred as a logarithmic spiral blade.

The equal sliding angle cutting blade has a significant effect on cutting stems with low fiber content. However, banana (Musa acuminata Colla) straw has a large amount of fiber. If the equal sliding angle cutting blade is used to cut banana straw, due to inertia, the fiber of the banana straw easily slides from the high cutting speed blade tip to the low cutting speed blade base and then wraps around the blade shaft. Therefore, in this case, the variable sliding cutting angle blade is needed (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Wang, Li and Liang2018).

Discussion

Cutting plant stems is a complex process, and its mechanism is currently unclear. The factors that affect the process of cutting plant stems can be roughly divided into two categories: one factor is the physical characteristics of the plant stem, and the other factor is the behavior and properties of the cutting components. Because plant stems are composite materials composed of cells, the morphology and physical properties of cells directly affect the physical characteristics of plant stems. During the cutting process, the blade would first contact the cells of the plant stem. Based on the cutting speed and sharpness of the blade, the cells and tissues of the stem would have different reactions. When the cutting speed and the sharpness of the blade are reduced, and the stem skin cells lack moisture, the material strength of the stem is low. In this case, the deformation of the stem skin caused by the stem epidermal cells and tissues being cut would be significant, with plant stems exhibiting characteristics of ductile materials. However, when the cutting speed and the blade sharpness is large, and the stem cells have moisture, the strength of the stem material would be high, leading to less deformation of the skin cells and tissues when the blade comes into contact. The strain rate strengthening effect of plant stems is significant, and plant stems exhibit brittle material characteristics. This reduces the cutting resistance and energy consumption. To reduce the cutting resistance and energy consumption, it is recommended to choose a cutting blade with a larger sliding angle and a smaller wedge angle for high-speed weeding when the weed moisture content is high.

Based on our review and summary, potential research directions can be focused on these areas:

  1. 1. The influence of friction on the cutting process: Due to the unclear cutting mechanism of plant stems, there are some important factors that affect cutting that have not been thoroughly understood. Friction has been mentioned several times in the preceding text and can actually affect the cutting process (He et al. Reference He, Ding, Du, Li, Ji, Li and Zhang2020), but there is still no explanation or application of the friction mechanism in cutting fresh plant stems. Therefore, friction during the cutting process of fresh plant stems is a possible research subject. Coatings can be added to blades to solve the friction problem of rotary tillage blades (Guan et al. Reference Guan, Fu, Cui, Wang, Gao and Yang2021), which could be a possible solution.

  2. 2. The comprehensive application of factors affecting the cutting process: Cutting blade design is an application based on the influence of specific factors on the cutting process, but the more common cutting blade designs mentioned earlier only utilize the influence of blade wedge angle and sliding cutting angle on the cutting process. Designing a cutting blade based on the comprehensive application of cutting speed, blade wedge angle, and sliding cutting angle on the cutting process is a valuable research direction.

  3. 3. The application of influence moisture content on the cutting process: The moisture content of plants is easily altered. However, due to the high cost of quickly changing the moisture content of plants through manpower, there are few designs based on the influence of moisture content on the cutting process in practical operations. Meanwhile, cutting speed is a very controllable influencing factor. Therefore, working standards or cutting methods based on the influence of moisture content and cutting speed on the cutting process are a direction that can be studied.

The methods proposed in this review can be applied not only to weed control, but also more generally to cutting plant stems. Cutting is an important part of harvesting work (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Ning, Li, Yang, Wu and Chen2017; Liang et al. Reference Liang, Li, Xu and Zhao2016), and the cutting theory for plant stems contributes to the development of harvesting technology. For example, cutting can cause vibration, with structural parts’ stress changing within the harvester (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Yuan, Gao, Tang and Li2019; Pang et al. Reference Pang, Li, Ji and Xu2019), and a deeper understanding of the cutting theory may help solve this problem. Cutting is also one of the important steps in processing straw (Bai et al. Reference Bai, Yang, Niu, Zhao, Zhou and Yuan2021). It is very important to remove straw from farmland to avoid breeding crop pests, poor sowing quality, and serious weeds during the seedling stage (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Wang, Li, Wang, Zhu and Chen2019; Tang et al. Reference Tang, Li and Cheng2017). In areas like these, the theory of cutting plant stems can play an important role.

Conclusions

This review provided directions for potential weed cutting techniques by reviewing the research progress of plant stem cutting technology. It listed evaluation indicators that can characterize the cutting process, summarized the factors that can significantly affect the cutting process based on these evaluation indicators, and finally, listed cutting blades designed based on the influences of these factors. It also elaborated on the possible plant stem cutting processes at different cutting speeds based on the impact of influences of the factors described. Potential research directions for plant stem cutting were discussed.

The main conclusions obtained are as follows:

  1. 1. The cutting of plant stems is a complex process that can be measured using ultimate shear stress, shear energy, and cutting quality. Among the easily modifiable parameters, factors that can significantly affect the cutting process are cutting speed; blade sharpness, including the wedge angle and the sliding cutting angle; and stem moisture content.

  2. 2. When the moisture content of plant stems is high, the stem cells would be full, the stem would be stronger, and the stem would be less likely to deform. When the cutting speed is high, the deformation of the plant stem would be insufficient, and the degree of deformation would be lower during the cutting process. Both of these factors can lead to brittle behavior of plant stems during the cutting process, reducing resistance and energy consumption during the cutting process.

  3. 3. Reducing the wedge angle and increasing the sliding cutting angle within a range can increase the sharpness of the blade, which can reduce cutting resistance and cutting energy consumption. However, excessive reduction of the blade wedge angle would lead to insufficient strength of the cutting edge. Excessive increase of the sliding cutting angle would increase the blade length put into operation and increase frictional power consumption, which would increase cutting resistance and energy consumption.

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of the Agricultural Engineering F608 Studio at Jiangsu University.

Funding statement

This work was supported by a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD-2023-87); Jiangsu Province agricultural machinery R&D, manufacturing, promotion, and application integration pilot project (JSYTH05); and Jiangsu Province and Education Ministry Co-sponsored Synergistic Innovation Center of Modern Agricultural Equipment (XTCX1003).

Footnotes

Associate Editor: William Vencill, University of Georgia

References

Adomako, MO, Ning, L, Tang, M, Du, DL, van Kleunen, M, Yu, FH (2019) Diversity- and density-mediated allelopathic effects of resident plant communities on invasion by an exotic plant. Plant Soil 440:581592 10.1007/s11104-019-04123-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alenyorege, EA, Ma, HL, Ayim, I, Zhou, CS (2018) Ultrasound decontamination of pesticides and microorganisms in fruits and vegetables: a review. J Food Saf Food Qual Arch Lebensmittelhyg 69:8091 Google Scholar
Bai, S, Yang, Q, Niu, K, Zhao, B, Zhou, L, Yuan, Y (2021) Discrete element-based optimization parameters of an experimental corn silage crushing and throwing device. Trans ASABE 64:10191026 10.13031/trans.14463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Y, Yu, Y, Tang, Z, Zhao, Y, Gu, X, Liu, S, Chen, S (2023) Multi-tooth cutting method and bionic cutter design for broccoli xylem (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica Plenck). Agriculture 13:1267 10.3390/agriculture13061267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandio, FA, Li, Y, Ma, Z, Ahmad, F, Syed, TN, Shaikh, SA, Tunio, MH (2021) Influences of moisture content and compressive loading speed on the mechanical properties of maize grain orientations. Int J Agric Biol Eng 14:4149 Google Scholar
Charee, S, Sudajan, S, Junsiri, C, Laloon, K, Oupathum, C (2021) Effects of moisture content and blade cutting speed on the chopping and size distribution of sugarcane leaves for the production of fuel biomass. Agric Eng Int 23:152161 Google Scholar
Chen, J, Ning, X, Li, Y, Yang, G, Wu, P, Chen, S (2017) A fuzzy control strategy for the forward speed of a combine harvester based on KDD. Appl Eng Agric 33:1522 Google Scholar
Chen, S, Memon, MS, Shen, B, Guo, J, Du, Z, Tang, Z, Guo, XH, Memon, H (2024) Identification of weeds in cotton fields at various growth stages using color feature techniques. Ital J Agron 19:100021 10.1016/j.ijagro.2024.100021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, W, Gao, Y, Shi, G, Li, J, Fan, G, Yang, C, Wang, B, Tong, F, Li, Y (2023) Enhanced degradation of fomesafen by a rhizobial strain Sinorhizobium sp. W16 in symbiotic association with soybean. Appl Soil Ecol 187:104847 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X, Xu, G, Zhang, X, Tan, W, Ding, Q, Tagar, AA (2024) Performance evaluation of biomimetic-designed rotary blades for straw incorporation in an intensive tillage system. Agriculture 14:1426 10.3390/agriculture14081426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, L, Miao, Z, Zhao, X, Yang, S, Gao, Y, Zhai, C, Zhao, C (2025) HAD-YOLO: an accurate and effective weed detection model based on improved YOLOV5 network. Agronomy 15:57 10.3390/agronomy15010057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowgiallo, A (2005) Cutting force of fibrous materials. J Food Eng 66:5761 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.02.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, Z, Hu, Y, Buttar, NA (2020) Analysis of mechanical properties for tea stem using grey relational analysis coupled with multiple linear regression. Sci Hortic 260:108886 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortea-Verdejo, M, Bumbaris, E, Burgstaller, C, Bismarck, A, Lee, KY (2017) Plant fibre-reinforced polymers: where do we stand in terms of tensile properties? Int Mat Rev 62:441464 10.1080/09506608.2016.1271089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galedar, MN, Jafari, A, Mohtasebi, SS, Tabatabaeefar, A, Sharifi, A, O’Dogherty, MJ, Rafiee, S, Richard, G (2008) Effects of moisture content and level in the crop on the engineering properties of alfalfa stems. Biosyst Eng 101:199208 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gan, H, Mathanker, S, Momin, MA, Kuhns, B, Stoffel, N, Hansen, A, Grift, T (2018) Effects of three cutting blade designs on energy consumption during mowing-conditioning of Miscanthus Giganteus. Biomass Bioenergy 109:166171 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.12.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan, C, Fu, J, Cui, Z, Wang, S, Gao, Q, Yang, Y (2021) Evaluation of the tribological and anti-adhesive properties of different materials coated rotary tillage blades. Soil Tillage Res 209:104933 10.1016/j.still.2021.104933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan, C, Fu, J, Xu, L, Jiang, X, Wang, S, Cui, Z (2022) Study on the reduction of soil adhesion and tillage force of bionic cutter teeth in secondary soil crushing. Biosyst Eng 213:133147 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.11.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Q, Zhang, X, Xu, Y, Li, P, Chen, C, Wu, S (2014) Design and experiment of cutting blade for cane straw. Trans Chinese Soc Agric Eng 30:4753 Google Scholar
Guo, Y, Cheng, L, Long, W, Gao, J, Zhang, J, Chen, S, Pu, H, Hu, M (2020a) Synergistic mutations of two rapeseed AHAS genes confer high resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides for weed control. Theor Appl Genet 133:28112824 10.1007/s00122-020-03633-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, Y, Liu, C, Long, W, Gao, J, Zhang, J, Chen, S, Pu, H, Hu, M (2022) Development and molecular analysis of a novel acetohydroxyacid synthase rapeseed mutant with high resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides. Crop J 10:5666 10.1016/j.cj.2021.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y, Wu, B, Guo, X, Ding, F, Pan, Z, Ma, H (2020b) Effects of power ultrasound enhancement on infrared drying of carrot slices: moisture migration and quality characterizations. LWT 126:109312 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Z, Ding, H, Du, S, Li, Z, Ji, J, Li, J, Zhang, Y (2020) Research on cutting characteristics of fiber bundle with high-speed photography. Int J Agric Biol Eng 13:9499 Google Scholar
Holmquist, TJ, Johnson, GR (2011) A computational constitutive model for glass subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high pressures. J Appl Mech 78:051003 10.1115/1.4004326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, J, Xu, L, Yu, Y, Lu, J, Han, D, Chai, X, Wu, Q, Zhu, L (2023) Design and experiment of bionic straw-cutting blades based on Locusta migratoria manilensis . Agriculture 13:2231 10.3390/agriculture13122231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huan, X, Pang, H, Li, S, Wang, D, You, Y (2024) Experimental study on the cutting characteristics of king grass stalk under different physical properties and mechanical parameters. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0730.v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J, Tan, L, Tian, K, Zhang, B, Ji, A, Liu, H, Shen, C (2023) Formation mechanism for the laying angle of hemp harvester based on ANSYS-ADAMS. Int J Agric Biol Eng 16:109115 Google Scholar
Huang, X, Wang, W, Li, Z, Wang, Q, Zhu, C, Chen, L (2019) Design method and experiment of machinery for combined application of seed, fertilizer and herbicide. Int J Agric Biol Eng 12:6371 Google Scholar
Hussain, M, Farooq, S, Merfield, C, Jabran, K (2018) Mechanical weed control. Pages 133155 in Jabran, K, Chauhan, BS, eds. Non-chemical Weed Control. London: Academic Press 10.1016/B978-0-12-809881-3.00008-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igathinathane, C, Womac, AR, Sokhansanj, S (2010) Corn stalk orientation effect on mechanical cutting. Biosyst Eng 107:97106 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabran, K, Chauhan, BS (2018) Overview and significance of non-chemical weed control. Pages 18 in Jabran, K, Chauhan, BS, eds. Non-chemical Weed Control. London: Academic Press Google Scholar
Johnson, GR, Holmquist, TJ (1994) An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials. AIP Conf Proc 309:981984 10.1063/1.46199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamandar, MR, Massah, J, Khanali, M (2018) Quasi-static and impact cutting behavior definition of privet stem. Agric Eng Int 20:7080 Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Mahapatra, M, Behera, D, Pradhan, PL, Swain, SK, Rath, I, Sahni, RK (2023) Effect of stem diameter, cutting speed and moisture content on cutting torque for green gram harvesting. Int J Bio-resource Stress Manag 14:11271132 10.23910/1.2023.3593bCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larue, CT, Goley, M, Shi, L, Evdokimov, AG, Sparks, OC, Ellis, C, Wollacott, AM, Rydel, TJ, Halls, CE, Van Scoyoc, B, Fu, XR, Nageotte, JR, Adio, AM, Zheng, MY, Sturman, EJ, et al. (2019) Development of enzymes for robust aryloxyphenoxypropionate and synthetic auxin herbicide tolerance traits in maize and soybean crops. Pest Manag Sci 75:20862094 10.1002/ps.5393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, B, Chen, Y, Chen, J (2016) Modeling of soil–claw interaction using the discrete element method (DEM). Soil Tillage Res 158:177185 10.1016/j.still.2015.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Z, Li, Y, Xu, L, Zhao, Z (2016) Sensor for monitoring rice grain sieve losses in combine harvesters. Biosyst Eng 147:5166 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, NG, DiTommaso, A, Westbrook, AS, Ketterings, QM, Mohler, CL (2021) Effects of fertility amendments on weed growth and weed–crop competition: a review. Weed Sci 69:132146 10.1017/wsc.2021.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J, Abbas, I, Noor, RS (2021) Development of deep learning-based variable rate agrochemical spraying system for targeted weeds control in strawberry crop. Agronomy 11:1480 10.3390/agronomy11081480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J, Fan, Q, Cai, H, Wang, F (2015) Underlying mechanism of periodical adiabatic shear bands generated in Ti–6Al–4V target by projectile impact. Mater Des 87:231237 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J, Yuan, Y, Gao, Y, Tang, S, Li, Z (2019) Virtual model of grip-and-cut picking for simulation of vibration and falling of grape clusters. Trans ASABE 62:603614 10.13031/trans.12875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J, Zhao, J, Zhang, J, Zhao, D (2020) Cutting constitutive equation and its parameter measurement of oil tree peony stem. J Beijing For Univ 42:138144 Google Scholar
Liu, P, He, J, Li, Y, Li, H, Wang, Q, Lu, C, Zhang, Z, Li, SH (2020) Design and experiment of double rollers maize stalk chopping device with different rotation speeds. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 36:6979 Google Scholar
Liu, Q, Mathanker, SK, Zhang, Q, Hansen, AC (2012) Biomechanical properties of miscanthus stems. Tran ASABE 55:11251131 10.13031/2013.42231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y, Wang, Y, Ma, G, Wang, B, Du, X, Shi, Q, Ni, J, Mao, H (2022) Mechanical properties of stem and physiological–biochemical responses of cucumber under different N and K conditions. Qual Assur Saf Crops Foods 14:6474 10.15586/qas.v14i1.1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, B, Sun, J, Yang, N, Wu, X, Zhou, X, Shen, J (2018) Quantitative detection of moisture content in rice seeds based on hyperspectral technique. J Food Process Eng 41:e12916 10.1111/jfpe.12916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, CT, Hussey, M, Gilchrist, MD (2007) On the sharpness of straight edge blades in cutting soft solids: Part I–indentation experiments. Eng Fract Mech 74:22052224 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.10.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, CT, Annaidh, AN, Gilchrist, MD (2010) On the sharpness of straight edge blades in cutting soft solids: Part II–analysis of blade geometry. Eng Fract Mech 77:437451 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mei, XY, Hong, YQ, Chen, GH (2016) Review on analysis methodology of phenoxy acid herbicide residues. Food Analyt Methods 9:15321561 10.1007/s12161-015-0327-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melkote, SN, Grzesik, W, Outeiro, J, Rech, J, Schulze, V, Attia, H, Arrazola, PJ, M’Saoubi, R, Saldana, C (2017) Advances in material and friction data for modelling of metal machining. CIRP Ann 66:731754 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, RDC, Harris, H (2003) Performance of basecutter of sugarcane harvester with angled and serrated blades. Rev Bras Eng Agric Ambient 7:355358 10.1590/S1415-43662003000200029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Memon, MS, Chen, S, Shen, B, Liang, R, Tang, Z, Wang, S, Zhou, W, Memon, N (2025) Automatic visual recognition, detection and classification of weeds in cotton fields based on machine vision. Crop Prot 187:106966 10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momin, MA, Wempe, PA, Grift, TE, Hansen, AC (2017) Effects of four base cutter blade designs on sugarcane stem cut quality. Trans ASABE 60:15511560 10.13031/trans.12345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, JK, Bemis, WE (2017) Shark teeth as edged weapons: serrated teeth of three species of selachians. Zoology 120:101109 10.1016/j.zool.2016.05.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osae, R, Essilfie, G, Alolga, RN, Bonah, E, Ma, H, Zhou, C (2020) Drying of ginger slices—evaluation of quality attributes, energy consumption, and kinetics study. J Food Process Eng 43:e13348 10.1111/jfpe.13348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyefeso, BO, Akintola, A, Afolabi, MG, Ogunlade, CA, Fadele, OK, Odeniyi, OM (2021) Influence of the moisture content and speed on the cutting force and energy of tannia cormels. Res Agric Eng 67:123130 10.17221/79/2020-RAECrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, J, Li, Y, Ji, J, Xu, L (2019) Vibration excitation identification and control of the cutter of a combine harvester using triaxial accelerometers and partial coherence sorting. Biosyst Eng 185:2534 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2019.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pei, H, Sun, Y, Huang, H, Zhang, W, Sheng, J, Zhang, Z (2022) Weed detection in maize fields by UAV images based on crop row preprocessing and improved YOLOv4. Agriculture 12:975 10.3390/agriculture12070975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, J, Ma, S, Xu, Y, Li, W, Huo, P, Li, W (2023) Design and test of sliding shear combined sugarcane basecutter. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 39:3747 Google Scholar
Qian, J, Ma, S, Xu, Y, Li, W, Wang, C, Yang, S, Wang, F (2024) Experimental study on the sugarcane stubble base-cutting mechanism. Biosyst Eng 245:122134 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2024.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabbani, H, Sohraby, N, Gholami, R, Jaliliantabar, F, Waismorady, A (2015) Determination of mass density module, crush resistance coefficient and cutting efficiency of rose (Rosa Damascene Mill). Sci Hortic 190:144148 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashid, MT, Ma, H, Jatoi, MA, Safdar, B, El-Mesery, HS, Sarpong, F, Ali, Z, Wali, A (2019) Multi-frequency ultrasound and sequential infrared drying on drying kinetics, thermodynamic properties, and quality assessment of sweet potatoes. J Food Process Eng 42:e13127 10.1111/jfpe.13127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuldt, S, Arnold, G, Kowalewski, J, Schneider, Y, Rohm, H (2016) Analysis of the sharpness of blades for food cutting. J Food Eng 188:1320 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.04.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, C, Li, X, Tian, K, Zhang, B, Huang, J, Chen, Q (2015) Experimental analysis on mechanical model of ramie stalk. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 31:2633 Google Scholar
Sirigiri, VKR, Gudiga, VY, Gattu, US, Suneesh, G, Buddaraju, KM (2022) A review on Johnson Cook material model. Mater Today Proceedings 62:34503456 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, H, Zhang, X, Xie, P, Chen, X, Liu, S (2024) Design and experiment of the identification cutting devices for a selective harvesting platform of broccoli. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 40:6879 Google Scholar
Song, S, Zhou, H, Jia, Z, Xu, L, Zhang, C, Shi, M, Hu, G (2022a) Effects of cutting parameters on the ultimate shear stress and specific cutting energy of sisal leaves. Biosyst Eng 218:189199 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.03.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, S, Zhou, H, Xu, L, Jia, Z, Hu, G (2022b) Cutting mechanical properties of sisal leaves under rotary impact cutting. Ind Crops Prod 182:114856 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, J, Tian, Y, Wu, X, Dai, C, Lu, B (2020) Nondestructive detection for moisture content in green tea based on dielectric properties and VISSA-GWO-SVR algorithm. J Food Process Preserv 44:e14421 10.1111/jfpp.14421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymanek, M (2007) Analysis of cutting process of plant material. Teka Komisji Motoryzacji i Energetyki Rolnictwa–OL PAN, VIIA 2007:107113 Google Scholar
Taghinezhad, J, Alimardani, R, Jafari, A (2013) Effect of moisture content and dimensional size on the shearing characteristics of sugarcane stalks. J Agric Technol 9:281294 Google Scholar
Tang, Z, Li, Y, Cheng, C (2017) Development of multi-functional combine harvester with grain harvesting and straw baling. Span J Agric Res 15:e0202 10.5424/sjar/2017151-10175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Z, Li, Y, Zhang, B, Wang, M, Li, Y (2020) Controlling rice leaf breaking force by temperature and moisture content to reduce breakage. Agronomy 10:628 10.3390/agronomy10050628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Z, Liang, Y, Wang, M, Zhang, H, Wang, X (2022) Effect of mechanical properties of rice stem and its fiber on the strength of straw rope. Ind Crops Prod 180:114729 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Z, Liang, Y, Zhang, B, Wang, M, Zhang, H, Li, Y (2021) Effects of multi-sequence combination forces on creep characteristics of bales during wheat harvesting. Int J Agric Biol Eng 14:8899 Google Scholar
Tao, T, Wei, X (2024) STBNA-YOLOv5: an improved YOLOv5 network for weed detection in rapeseed field. Agriculture 15:22 10.3390/agriculture15010022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, F, Xia, K, Wang, J, Song, Z, Yan, Y, Li, F, Wang, F (2021) Design and experiment of self-propelled straw forage crop harvester. Adv Mech Eng 13:112 10.1177/16878140211024455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, K, Li, X, Zhang, B, Chen, Q, Shen, C, Huang, J (2017) Design and test research on cutting blade of corn harvester based on bionic principle. Appl Bionics Biomech 2017:6953786 10.1155/2017/6953786CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tian, K, Zhang, B, Ji, A, Huang, J, Liu, H, Shen, C (2023) Design and experiment of the bionic disc cutter for kenaf harvesters. Int J Agric Biol Eng 16:116123 Google Scholar
Tong, J, Xu, S, Chen, D, Li, M (2017) Design of a bionic blade for vegetable chopper. J Bionic Eng 14:163171 10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60387-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, A, Li, W, Men, X, Gao, B, Xu, Y, Wei, X (2022) Vegetation detection based on spectral information and development of a low-cost vegetation sensor for selective spraying. Pest Manag Sci 78:24672476 10.1002/ps.6874CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, B, Liu, Z, Cai, Y, Luo, X, Ma, H, Song, Q, Xiong, Z (2021) Advancements in material removal mechanism and surface integrity of high speed metal cutting: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 166:103744 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2021.103744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, B, Liu, Z, Su, G, Song, Q, Ai, X (2015) Investigations of critical cutting speed and ductile-to-brittle transition mechanism for workpiece material in ultra-high speed machining. Int J Mech Sci 104:4459 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, F, Xu, Y, Li, W, Chen, Z, Wang, J, Fan, F, Tao, Y, Jiang, Y, Zhu, Q, Yang, J (2021) Creating a novel herbicide-tolerance OsALS allele using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. Crop J 9:305312 10.1016/j.cj.2020.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J, Guan, R, Gao, P, Zhou, W, Tang, H (2020) Design and experiment of single disc to top cutting device for carrot combine harvester. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 51:7381 Google Scholar
Wang, J, Wang, X, Li, H, He, J, Lu, C, Liu, D (2021) Design and experiment of rice straw chopping device for agitation sliding cutting and tearing. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 52:2840 Google Scholar
Wang, L (2011) Foundations of Stress Waves. New York: Elsevier. Pp 8889 Google Scholar
Wang, W, Lv, X, Yi, Z (2022a) Parameter optimization of reciprocating cutter for Chinese little greens based on finite element simulation and experiment. Agriculture 12:2131 10.3390/agriculture12122131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W, Wang, S, Zhang, J, Lv, X, Yi, Z (2022b) Experiment and research on cutting mechanical properties of little cabbage. Appl Sci 12:2060 10.3390/app12042060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y, Yang, Y, Zhao, H, Liu, B, Ma, J, He, Y, Zhang, Y, Xu, H (2020) Effects of cutting parameters on cutting of citrus fruit stems. Biosyst Eng 193:111 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y, Zhang, X, Ma, G, Du, X, Shaheen, N, Mao, H (2021) Recognition of weeds at asparagus fields using multi-feature fusion and backpropagation neural network. Int J Agric Biol Eng 14:190198 Google Scholar
Wu, B, Guo, X, Guo, Y, Ma, H, Zhou, C (2021) Enhancing jackfruit infrared drying by combining ultrasound treatments: effect on drying characteristics, quality properties and microstructure. Food Chem 358:129845 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129845CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, M, Guan, C, Tang, C, Chen, S, Luo, H, Xie, F (2009) Experiments on influencing factors of cutting force of rape stem. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 25:141144 Google Scholar
Xu, B, Tiliwa, ES, Yan, W, Azam, SR, Wei, B, Zhou, C, Ma, H, Bhandari, B (2022) Recent development in high quality drying of fruits and vegetables assisted by ultrasound: a review. Food Res Int 152:110744 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110744CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Y, Zhang, X, Sun, X, Wang, J, Liu, J, Li, Z, Guo, Q, Li, P (2016) Tensile mechanical properties of greenhouse cucumber cane. Int J Agric Biol Eng 9:18 Google Scholar
Yang, Q, Yang, X, Zhang, Z, Wang, J, Fu, W, Li, Y (2021) Investigating the resistance levels and mechanisms to penoxsulam and cyhalofop-butyl in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) from Ningxia Province, China. Weed Sci 69:422429 Google Scholar
Yang, X, Han, H, Cao, J, Li, Y, Yu, Q, Powles, SB (2021) Exploring quinclorac resistance mechanisms in Echinochloa crus-pavonis from China. Pest Manag Sci 77:194201 10.1002/ps.6007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, X, Zhang, B (2019) Material embrittlement in high strain-rate loading. Int J Extreme Manuf 1:022003 10.1088/2631-7990/ab263fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, H, Han, Z, Zhang, J, Zhang, S (2021) Bionic design of tools in cutting: reducing adhesion, abrasion or friction. Wear 482:203955 10.1016/j.wear.2021.203955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, B, Tang, Z, Wang, M, Li, Y (2022) Breaking behaviour of wheat stem undergoing multiple forces combination sequence during threshing process. J Agric Sci Technol 24:351363.Google Scholar
Zhang, HY, Goncalves, P, Copeland, E, Qi, SS, Dai, ZC, Li, GL, Wang, CY, Du, DL, Thomas, T (2020) Invasion by the weed Conyza canadensis alters soil nutrient supply and shifts microbiota structure. Soil Biol Biochem 143:107739 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X, Ni, S, Liu, J, Hu, X, Zhang, Z, Fu, S (2024) Design and flow field analysis of bionic blade of banana straw crushing and throwing machine. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 55:138151 Google Scholar
Zhang, X, Wang, Z, Li, Y, Liang, D (2018) Design and experiment of sliding-cutting and anti-twining returning device for banana straw. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 34:2634 Google Scholar
Zhao, Y, Tang, Z, Chen, S (2022) Loading model and mechanical properties of mature broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. Var. Italica Plenck) stems at harvest. Agriculture 12:1519 10.3390/agriculture12101519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, S, Zhao, X, Fu, H, Tan, H, Zhai, C, Chen, L (2025) Design and experimental evaluation of a smart intra-row weed control system for open-field cabbage. Agronomy 15:112 10.3390/agronomy15010112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Z, He, J, Li, H, Diao, PS, Wang, QJ, Zhang, XC (2016) Design and experiment of straw-chopping device with chopping and fixed knife supported slide cutting. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 47:108116 Google Scholar
Zhou, JW, Zou, XM, Song, SH, Chen, GH (2018) Quantum dots applied to methodology on detection of pesticide and veterinary drug residues. J Agric Food Chem 66:13071319 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, L, Shimizu, J, Muroya, A, Eda, H (2003) Material removal mechanism beyond plastic wave propagation rate. Precis Eng 27:109116 10.1016/S0141-6359(02)00124-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X, Sun, J, Mao, H, Wu, X, Zhang, X, Yang, N (2018) Visualization research of moisture content in leaf lettuce leaves based on WT-PLSR and hyperspectral imaging technology. J Food Process Eng 41:e12647 10.1111/jfpe.12647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y, Li, X, Shen, C, Tian, K, Zhang, B, Huang, J (2016) Experimental analysis on mechanical model of industrial hemp stalk. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 32:2229 Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. The force-displacement curve explaining the nature of cutting process (Igathinathane et al. 2010).

Figure 1

Figure 2. The effect of cutting speed on ultimate cutting stress and Specific cutting energy in a cutting test using sisal (Agave sisalana Perrine) leaves (Song et al. 2022a).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Mechanical response of materials under different loading conditions (Wang et al. 2015).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Mechanical response of materials under different loading conditions (Yang and Zhang 2019).

Figure 4

Figure 5. The section of the sample and the stress field during the impact process (Liu et al. 2015).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of sliding angle (Song et al. 2022a).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Schematic diagram of sliding angle (Tian et al. 2021).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Longitudinal microstructure of carrot (Daucus carota L.). (A) Fresh; (B and D) infrared drying; (C and E) ultrasound-assisted infrared drying (Guo et al. 2020b).

Figure 8

Figure 9. The sugarcane stubble damage condition: (A) undamaged stubble; (B) slight damage; (C) moderate damage; (D) severe damage; and (E) uprooting (Qian et al. 2024).

Figure 9

Figure 10. Test instruments: (A) texture analyzer and (B) pendulum-based cutting test setup.

Figure 10

Figure 11. The design process for a bionic cutting blade inspired by Oriental migratory locust (Cao et al. 2023).

Figure 11

Figure 12. Serrated blade design with strip-shaped serrations (Gan et al. 2018).

Figure 12

Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the equal sliding cutting angle blade curve (P Liu et al. 2020).