Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T22:23:53.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Structure and Herbicidal Activity of Some Substituted Ureas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. J. Hogue
E. J. Hogue*
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, St. Jean, Quebec
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In preemergence application of six different substituted urea herbicides on coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.), the monohalogenated compounds were more effective in the destruction of the plants than their dihalogenated counterparts. The relative difference in effectiveness was much greater in the resistant coriander which appears to take up less dihalogenated than monohalogenated herbicide. In postemergence application, the dihalogenated herbicides generally were slightly more toxic than their monohalogenated counterparts.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 18 , Issue 5 , September 1970 , pp. 580 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Bishop, N. I. 1958. The influence of the herbicide, DCMU, on oxygen-evolving system of photosynthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 27:205–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Bucha, H. C. and Todd, C. W. 1951. 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea—a new herbicide. Science 114:493–494.Google Scholar
3. Coggins, C. W. Jr. and Crafts, A. S. 1959. Substituted urea herbicides: Their electrophoretic behavior and the influence of clay colloid in nutrient solution on their phototoxicity. Weeds 7:349–358.Google Scholar
4. Cooke, A. R. 1955. Effect of CMU on the biochemical composition of several legumes. Res. Rep. No. Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. 12:181.Google Scholar
5. Cooke, A. R. 1956. A possible mechanism of action of the urea type herbicides. Weeds 4:397–398.Google Scholar
6. Good, N. E. 1961. Inhibitors of the Hill reaction. Plant Physiol. 36:788–803.Google Scholar
7. Hogue, E. J. and Warren, G. F. 1968. Selectivity of linuron on tomato and parsnip. Weed Sci. 16:51–54.Google Scholar
8. Jagendorf, A. T. and Avron, M. 1959. Inhibitors of photosynthetic phosphorylation in relation to electron and oxygen transport pathways to chloroplasts. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 80:246–257.Google Scholar
9. Minshall, W. H. 1954. Translocation path and places of action of 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea in bean and tomato. Can. J. Bot. 32:795–798.Google Scholar
10. Moreland, D. E. and Hill, K. L. 1962. Interference of herbicides with Hill reaction of isolated chloroplasts. Weeds 10:229–236.Google Scholar
11. Musik, T. J., Cruzado, H. J. and Loustalot, A. J. 1954. Studies on the absorption, translocation, and action of CMU. Bot. Gaz. 116:65–73.Google Scholar
12. Sharp, S. S., Swingle, M. C., McCall, G. L., Weed, M. B. and Cowart, L. E. 1953. Herbicidal use of phenyldimethylurea. Agr. Chem. 8:56–57.Google Scholar
13. Van Oorschot, J. L. P. 1964. Tolerance of carrots to some herbicides inhibiting photosynthesis. Meded. Landbhogesch. Gent. 29:683–694.Google Scholar