Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T21:22:54.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) and Rhizopus sp. on Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) Germination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ronald B. Wiley ,
Edward E. Schweizer  and
Earl G. Ruppel
Ronald B. Wiley
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Edward E. Schweizer
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Crops Res. Lab., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Earl G. Ruppel
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Crops Res. Lab., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Emergence of sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris L. ‘MonoHy D2’) from soil was reduced by germinating kochia [Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. ♯ KCHSC] seed at densities greater than 1 seed/cm2 when the fungus Rhizopus sp. was present. Water-soluble exudates from germinated kochia seed did not influence Rhizopus growth in vitro or sugarbeet germination. Cell-free culture extracts of Rhizopus reduced sugarbeet germination and radicle elongation. There appeared to be an interaction between kochia and Rhizopus, but the responsible compounds were not identified.

Keywords

Allelopathyallelopathic interactionfungal toxinKCHSC

Information

Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , March 1985 , pp. 275 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Allen, P. J. 1976. Control of spore germination and infection structure formation in the fungi. Pages 51–85 in Heitefuss, R. and Williams, P. H., eds. Physiological Plant Pathology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Baker, K. F. and Cook, J. R. 1974. Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
3. Booth, J. A. 1974. Effect of cotton root exudate constituents on growth and pectolytic enzyme production by Verticillium albo-atrum . Can. J. Bot. 52:2219–2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Griffin, G. J. and Roth, D. A. 1979. Nutritional aspects of soil mycostasis. Pages 79–96 in Schippers, B. and Gams, W., eds. Soil-borne Plant Pathogens. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
6. Lodhi, M.A.K. 1979. Germination and decreased growth of Kochia scoparia in relation to its autoallelopathy. Can. J. Bot. 57:1083–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Mirocha, C. J. 1972. Phytotoxins and metabolism. Pages 191–209 in Wood, R.K.S., Ballio, A., and Granite, A., eds. Phytotoxins in Plant Diseases. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
8. Mirocha, C. J., DeVay, J. E., and Wilson, E. E. 1961. Role of fumaric acid in the hull rot disease of almond. Phytopathology 51:851–860.Google Scholar
9. Mitchell, J. E. 1976. The effect of roots on the activity of soilborne plant pathogens. Pages 104–128 in Heitefuss, R. and Williams, P. H., eds. Physiological Plant Pathology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Parshall, M. 1961. Meteorological data, 1887–1957. Colo. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 5095. 17 pp.Google Scholar
11. Rice, E. L. 1974. Allelopathy. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
12. Rovira, A. D. and Davey, C. B. 1974. Biology of the rhizosphere. Pages 153–204 in Carson, E. W., ed. The Plant Root and Its Environment. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
13. Rudolph, K. 1976. Non-specific toxins. Pages 270–315 in Heitefuss, R. and Williams, P. H., eds. Physiological Plant Pathology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Schweizer, E. E. 1981. Broadleaf weed interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 29:128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Schweizer, E. E. 1983. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 31:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Schweizer, E. E. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after six years of continuous corn (Zea mays) and herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Srivastava, D. N. and Walker, J. C. 1959. Mechanisms of infection of sweet potato roots by Rhizopus stolonifer . Phytopathology 49:400–406.Google Scholar
18. Sullia, S. B. 1973. Effect of root exudates and extracts on rhizosphere fungi. Plant Soil 39:197–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Terry, N. 1970. Developmental physiology of the sugarbeet. J. Exp. Bot. 21:477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Weatherspoon, D. M. and Schweizer, E. E. 1971. Competition between sugarbeets and five densities of kochia. Weed Sci. 19:125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Wilson, R. G. Jr. 1981. Effect of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) residue on growth of some crops. Weed Sci. 29:159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar