Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T13:53:54.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Spring Wheat Planting Density, Row Spacing, and Mechanical Weed Control on Yield, Grain Protein, and Economic Return in Maine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Lauren N. Kolb ,
Eric R. Gallandt  and
Ellen B. Mallory
Lauren N. Kolb*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Environmental Science, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469
Eric R. Gallandt
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Environmental Science, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469
Ellen B. Mallory
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Environmental Science, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469 University of Maine Cooperative Extension, Orono, ME 04473
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: lnkolb@umd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effective in-season weed management options are limited for organic cereal farmers. Two alternatives to current farmer practices are improving efficacy of physical weed control through use of interrow cultivation or increasing the competitive ability of the crop through elevated seeding rates and more uniform spatial planting patterns. It is unknown how these two methods affect yield, quality, and economic returns. Field experiments were conducted in the northeast United States to determine whether the yield gain from increased weed control from these contrasting weed management strategies resulted in increased net returns and how these different systems affected grain quality. Wheat was planted at two seeding rates (400 and 600 plants m−2), in three row spacings (11, 18, and 23 cm). A fourth crop arrangement that approaches a more uniform spatial distribution through a combination of drilling and broadcasting seed was included. For weed control, treatments received tine harrowing. Wheat sown in wide rows also received interrow cultivation. Each system was sown in the presence and absence of condiment mustard, which was sown as a surrogate weed. Increased seeding rate reduced weed density 64% compared to a crop-free check and 30% compared to regional farmers' practices of 18-cm rows and 400 plants m−2. Increased seeding rates lowered grain protein 5% compared to standard seeding rates. Wide rows, in combination with interrow cultivation, reduced weed density 62%, increased yield 16%, and net returns 19% compared to regional organic practices. Significant increases in grain N were limited to weed-free plots. While increased seeding rates improved weed suppression, the high input cost of organic seed make this an unsatisfactory alternative to interrow cultivation and current farmer practices, as yield would need to be. 15 t ha−1 higher at elevated density to offset the extra cost of seed.

Keywords

Wheat, Triticum aestivum Lwhite mustard, Sinapis alba LCondiment mustardphysical weed controlenhanced competitionorganic cerealsbread wheatgrain quality
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 244 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.

References

Literature Cited

American Association of Cereal Chemists. 2011. Crude protein, calculated from percentage of total nitrogen, in wheat and flour in American Association of Cereal Chemists, 11th ed. Method 46-19.01 approved April 13, 1961, reviewed November 3, 1999. The Association, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
Arduini, I., Masoni, A., Ercoli, L., and Mariotti, M. 2006. Grain yield, and dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in durum wheat as affected by variety and seeding rate. Eur. J. Agron. 25:309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, B. C. 1986. Cereal production with broadcast seed and reduced tillage: a review of recent experimental and farming experience. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 35:71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bàrberi, P. 2002. Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues? Weed Res. 42:177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiaans, L., Paolini, R., and Baumann, D. 2008. Focus on ecological weed management: what is hindering adoption? Weed Res. 48:481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbella, M. and Paulsen, G. 1998. Efficacy of treatments for delaying senescence of wheat leaves: II. Senescence and grain yield under field conditions. Agron. J. 90:332–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertholdsson, N. O. 2005. Early vigour and allelopathy: two useful traits for enhanced barley and wheat competitiveness against weeds. Weed Res. 45:94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, N. S., Brennan, E. B., Smith, R. F., and Yokota, R. 2009. Effect of seeding rate and planting arrangement on rye cover crop and weed growth. Agron. J. 101:47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, E. B., Boyd, N. S., Smith, R. F., and Foster, P. 2009. Seeding rate and planting arrangement effects on growth and weed suppression of a legume-oat cover crop for organic vegetable systems. Agron. J. 101:979–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capouchová, I., Petr, J., Bicanová, E., and Famera, O. 2009. Effects of organic wheat cultivation in wider rows on the grain yield and quality. Lucrări Ştiinţifice – seria Agronomie. 52:97–102.Google Scholar
Carr, P. M., Horsley, R. D., and Poland, W. W. 2003a. Tillage and seeding rate effects on wheat cultivars. Crop Sci. 43:202–209.Google Scholar
Carr, P. M., Horsley, R. D., and Poland, W. W. 2003b. Tillage and seeding rate effects on wheat cultivars: II. Yield components. Crop Sci. 43:210–218.Google Scholar
Casagrande, M., David, C., Valantin-Morison, M., Makowski, D., and Jeuffroy, M-. H. 2009. Factors limiting the grain protein content of organic winter wheat in south-eastern France: a mixed-model approach. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29:565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, G., Froud-Willoams, R. J., and Holland, J. M. 1998. Interactions between wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar, row spacing and density and the effect on weed suppression and crop yield. Ann. Appl. Biol. 133:443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirujeda, A., Melander, B., Rasmussen, K., and Rasmussen, I. A. 2003. Relationship between speed, soil movement into the cereal row and intra-row weed control efficacy by weed harrowing. Weed Res. 43:285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R. 1988. Misinterpretations of results in weed research through inappropriate use of statistics. Weed Res. 28:281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Lago, J. E., Stuthman, D. D., and Leonard, K. J. 2003. Evaluation of components of partial resistance to oat crown rust using digital image analysis. Plant Disease. 87:667–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firbank, L. G., Cousens, R., Mortimer, A. M., and Smith, R. G. R. 1990. Effects of soil type on crop yield-weed density relationships between winter wheat and Bromus sterilis . J. Appl. Ecol. 27:308–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. A. and Miles, R. E. 1973. The role of spatial pattern in the competition between crop plants and weeds: a theoretical analysis. Mathematical BioSci. 18:335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geleta, B., Atak, M., Baenziger, P. S., Nelson, L. A., Baltenesperger, D. D., Eskridge, K. M., Shipman, M. J., and Shelton, D. R. 2002. Seeding rate and genotype effect on agronomic performance and end-use quality of winter wheat. Crop Sci. 42:827–832.Google Scholar
Gooding, M., Pinyosinwat, A., and Ellis, R. H. 2002. Responses of wheat grain yield and quality to seed rate. J. Agric. Sci. 138:317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, M. J. 2007. Influence of foliar diseases and their control by fungicides on grain yield and quality in wheat. Pages 567–581 in Buck, H. T., Nisi, J. E., and Salomón, N., eds. Wheat Production in Stressed Environments. Dordrecht, Netherlands Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulding, K. W. T., Poulton, P. R., Webster, C. P., and Howe, M. T. 2000. Nitrate leaching from the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment, Rothamsted, UK, as influenced by fertilizer and manure inputs and the weather. Soil Use and Management. 16:244–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagedorn, F., Steiner, K. G., Sekayange, L., and Zech, W. 1997. Effect of rainfall pattern on nitrogen mineralization and leaching in a green manure experiment in South Rwanda. Plant and Soil. 195:365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heege, H. J. 1993. Seeding methods performance for cereals, rape, and beans. Trans. ASAE. 36:653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiltbrunner, J., Liedgens, M., Stamp, P., and Streit, B. 2005. Effects of row spacing and liquid manure on directly drilled winter wheat in organic farming. Eur. J. Agron. 22:441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, A. M. and Stevenson, F. C. 2001. Wheat seeding rate for spread and distinct row seed placement with air seeders. Can. J. Plant Sci. 81:885–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N. 1993. Prospects for weed control through crop interference. Ecol. Applic. 3:84–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kersbergen, R., Mallory, E. B., and Molloy, T. 2009. Growing organic cereal grains in New England. Orono, ME University of Maine Cooperative Extension. 6 p.Google Scholar
Ketterings, Q., Albrecht, G., Czymmek, K., and Brossard, B. 2005. Nitrogen credits from manure. C. U. C. Extension No. Fact Sheet 4. Ithaca, NY Department of Crop and Soil Sciences.Google Scholar
Kolb, L. N., Gallandt, E. R., and Molloy, T. 2010. Improving weed management in organic spring barley: physical weed control vs. interspecific competition. Weed Res. 50:597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouwenhoven, J. K. 1997. Intra-row mechanical weed control: possibilities and problems. Soil Tillage Res. 41:87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurstjens, D. A. G. and Kropff, M. J. 2001. The impact of uprooting and soil-covering on the effectiveness of weed harrowing. Weed Res. 41:211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurstjens, D. A. G., Perdok, U. D., and Goense, D. 2000. Selective uprooting by weed harrowing on sandy soils. Weed Res. 40:431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafond, G. P. 1994. Effects of row spacing, seeding rate and nitrogen on yield of barley and wheat under zero-till management. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74:703–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, W. 2009. Machinery Cost Estimates. http://faculty.apec.umn.edu/wlazarus/documents/machdata.pdf. Accessed: May 2, 2010.Google Scholar
Lemerle, D., Cousens, R. D., Gill, G. S., Peltzer, S. J., Moerkerk, M., Murphy, C. E., Collins, D., and Cullis, B. R. 2004. Reliability of higher seeding rates of wheat for increased competitiveness with weeds in low rainfall environments. J. Agric. Sci. 142:395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. and Severson, K. 2008. Sticker schock in the organic aisles. The New York Times. 18 April 2008.Google Scholar
Mason, H., Navabi, A., Frick, B., O'Donovan, J., and Spaner, D. 2007. Cultivar and seeding rate effects on the competitive ability of spring cereals grown under organic production in northern Canada. Agron. J. 99:1199–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, M. G. and Madin, R. W. 1996. Effect of weeds and nitrogen fertiliser on yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 36:443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melander, B., Cirujeda, A., and Jørgensen, M. H. 2003. Effects of inter-row hoeing and fertilizer placement on weed growth and yield of winter wheat. Weed Res. 43:428–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melander, B., Rasmussen, I. A., and Bàrberi, P. 2005. Integrating physical and cultural methods of weed control: examples from European research. Weed Sci. 53:369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, S. K. and Jansen, J. 2002. Weed seed production, crop planting pattern, and mechanical weeding in wheat. Weed Sci. 50:748–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohler, C. L. 2001. Enhancing the competitve ability of crops. Pages 269–321 in Liebman, M., Mohler, C. L., and Staver, C. P., eds. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. New York Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2001. Monthly Station Normals of Temperature, Precipitation, and Heating and Cooling Degree Days 1971–2000: Maine. Asheville, NC U.S. Department of Commerce National Climatic Data Center. 16 p.Google Scholar
Olofsdotter, M. 2001. Getting closer to breeding for competitive ability and the role of allelopathy: an example from rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 15:798–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J., Kristensen, L., and Weiner, J. 2005. Effects of density and spatial pattern of winter wheat on suppression of different weed species. Weed Sci. 53:690–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J., Kristensen, L., and Weiner, J. 2006. Influence of sowing density and spatial pattern of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) on the suppression of different weed species. Weed Biol. Manag. 6:165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J. and Weiner, J. 2007. The influence of Triticum aestivum density, sowing pattern and nitrogen fertilization on leaf area index and its spatial variation. Basic Appl. Ecol. 8:252–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onofri, A., Carbonell, E. A., Piepho, H. P., Mortimer, A. M., and Cousens, R. D. 2010. Current statistical issues in Weed Research. Weed Res. 50:5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozturk, A., Caglar, O., and Bulut, S. 2006. Growth and yield response of facultative wheat to winter sowing, freezing sowing and spring sowing at different seeding rates. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 192:10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullen, D. W. M. and Cowell, P. A. 1997. An evaluation of the performance of mechanical weeding mechanisms for use in high speed inter-row weeding of arable crops. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 67:27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, G. and Keough, M. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. 537 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, I. A. 2004. The effect of sowing date, stale seedbed, row width and mechanical weed control on weeds and yields of organic winter wheat. Weed Res. 44:12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, J. 1990. Selectivity: an important parameter on establishing the optimum harrowing technique for weed-control in growing cereals. Pages 197–204 in Proceedings 7th EWRS Symposium 1990: Integrated Weed Management in Cereals, Helsinki, Finland. Doorwerth, The Netherlands European Weed Research Society.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J. and Ascard, J. 1995. Weed control in organic farming systems. Pages 50–67 in Glen, D., Greaves, M., and Anderson, H., eds. Ecology and Integrated Farming Systems. Chichester, UK Wiley.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, K. 2002. Influence of liquid manure application method on weed control in spring cereals. Weed Res. 42:287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathke, L. 2011. Local wheat sees revival in former grain states. Associated Press. 24 August 2011.Google Scholar
Regnier, E. E. and Bakelana, K. B. 1995. Crop planting pattern effects on early growth and canopy shape of cultivated and wild oats (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 43:88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, I. 2008. Flour that has the flavor of home. The New York Times. 10 September 2008.Google Scholar
Sweeney, R. A. 1989. Generic Combustion Method for Determination of Crude Protein in Feeds: Collaborative Study. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 72:770–774.Google ScholarPubMed
Syme, J. 1972. Features of high-yielding wheats grown at two seed rates and two nitrogen levels. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 12:165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Economic Research Service. 2010. Organic Production: Certified Organic Grains 1997 and 2000–2008. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2010. 2010 Machinery Custom Rates. Harrisburg, PA U.S. Department of Agriculture. 4 p.Google Scholar
Weiner, J., Griepentrog, H-W., and Kristensen, L. 2001. Suppression of weeds by spring wheat triticum aestivum increases with crop density and spatial uniformity. J. Appl. Ecol. 38:784–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. J., Wright, K. J., and Butler, R. C. 1993. The effect of different frequencies of harrowing in the autumn or spring on winter wheat, and on the control of Stellaria media (L.) vill., Galium aparine L. and Brassica napus L. Weed Res. 33:501–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J., Chang, T., and Konzak, C. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar