Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-06T00:41:18.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate-induced hormesis: impact on seedling growth and reproductive potential of common sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2020

Ahmadreza Mobli ,
Amar Matloob Open the ORCID record for Amar Matloob [Opens in a new window]  and
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
Ahmadreza Mobli
Affiliation:
Former PhD Student, Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran Associate Professor, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) and School of Agriculture and Food Sciences (SAFS), University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia
Amar Matloob*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) and School of Agriculture and Food Sciences (SAFS), University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Amar Matloob, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan. (Email: amar.matloob@mnsuam.edu.pk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Australia, glyphosate is widely used in glyphosate-tolerant crops and fallows to control weeds such as common sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus L.). It has been hypothesized that glyphosate at sublethal doses, as a consequence of herbicide drift, may have a stimulatory effect on S. oleraceus growth. In 2017, pot trials were conducted to evaluate the effect of low doses of glyphosate on growth and seed production of this weed at the Weed Science Screenhouse Facility at the University of Queensland, Australia. At the 4- to 5-leaf stage (3-wk-old rosette), plants were treated with low doses of glyphosate (0 [control], 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 800 g ae ha−1), and their responses were recorded until plant maturity. The study was repeated after completion of the first experimental run. An additional glyphosate dose (2.5 g ha−1) was added in the second run. The low doses of glyphosate (<40 g ha−1) caused a significant increase in S. oleraceus plant height and number of leaves compared with the no-glyphosate treatment. The highest stimulatory effect was observed at 5 g ha−1. At 5 g ha−1 glyphosate, S. oleraceus seed production increased by 154% and 101% in the first and second experimental runs, respectively, compared with the no-glyphosate treatment. The results of this study suggest that the sublethal doses of glyphosate produced hormetic effects on growth and seed production of S. oleraceus that changed the dynamics of weed–crop competition.

Keywords

Glyphosate drifthormetic effectsweed fitnessweed growthweed seed production

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 68 , Issue 6 , November 2020 , pp. 605 - 611
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Mithila Jugulam, Kansas State University

References

Al-Khatib, K, Peterson, D (1999) Soybean (Glycine max) response to simulated drift from selected sulfonylurea herbicides, dicamba, glyphosate, and glufosinate. Weed Technol 13:264–270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asman, W, Jørgensen, A, Jensen, PK (2003) Dry deposition and spray drift of pesticides to nearby water bodies. Pages 1–171 in Pesticide Research Report 66. Copenhagen: Danish Environmental Protection Agency Google Scholar
Aune, JB (2012) Conventional, organic and conservation agriculture: production and environmental impact. Pages 149–165 in Lichtfouse, E, ed. Agroecology and Strategies for Climate Change. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, RG (2014) Is hormesis an underestimated factor in the development of herbicide resistance? Julius-Kühn-Archiv 443:81–91 Google Scholar
Belz, RG, Cedergreen, N (2010) Parthenin hormesis in plants depends on growth conditions. Environ Exp Bot 69:293–301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, RG, Cedergreen, N, Duke, SO (2011) Herbicide hormesis—can it be useful in crop production? Weed Res 51:321–332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, RG, Duke, SO (2014) Herbicides and plant hormesis. Pest Manag Sci 70:698–707 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belz, RG, Duke, SO (2017) Herbicide-mediated hormesis. Pages 135–148 in Duke, SO, Kudsk, P, Solomon, K, eds. Pesticide Dose: Effects on the Environment and Target and Non-target Organisms. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, RG, Farooq, MB, Wagner, J (2018). Does selective hormesis impact herbicide resistance evolution in weeds? ACCase-resistant populations of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. as a case study. Pest Manag Sci 74:1880–1891 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borggaard, OK, Gimsing, AL (2008) Fate of glyphosate in soil and the possibility of leaching to ground and surface waters: a review. Pest Manag Sci 64:441–456 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brito, IPFS, Tropaldi, L, Carbonari, CA, Velini, ED (2018). Hormetic effects of glyphosate on plants. Pest Manag Sci 74:1064–1070 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cederlund, H (2017) Effects of spray drift of glyphosate on nontarget terrestrial plants—a critical review. Environ Toxicol Chem 36:2879–2886 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cedergreen, N (2008a) Herbicides can stimulate plant growth. Weed Res 48:429–438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cedergreen, N (2008b) Is the growth stimulation by low doses of glyphosate sustained over time? Environ Pollut 156:1099–1104 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cedergreen, N, Felby, C, Porter, JR, Streibig, JC (2009) Chemical stress can increase crop yield. Field Crops Res 114:54–57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cedergreen, N, Olesen, CF (2010) Can glyphosate stimulate photosynthesis? Pesticide Biochem Physiol 96:140–148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Gill, G, Preston, C (2006) Factors affecting seed germination of annual sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) in southern Australia. Weed Sci 54:854–860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Singh, RG, Mahajan, G (2012) Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: a review. Crop Prot 38:57–65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clua, A, Conti, M, Beltrano, J (2012) The effects of glyphosate on the growth of birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) and its interaction with different phosphorus contents in soil. J Agric Sci 4:208–218 Google Scholar
De Moraes, CP, de Brito, IP, Tropaldi, L, Carbonari, CA, Velini, ED (2020) Hormetic effect of glyphosate on Urochloa decumbens plants. J Environ Sci Health B 55:376–381 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duke, SO, Powles, SB (2008) Glyphosate: a once in a century herbicide. Pest Manag Sci 64:319–325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farooq, N, Abbas, T, Tanveer, A, Javaid, MM, Ali, HH, Safdar, ME, Khan, A, Zohaib, A, Shazad, B (2019) Differential hormetic response of fenoxaprop-pethyl resistant and susceptible Phalaris minor populations: a potential factor in resistance evolution. Planta Daninha 37:e019187554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesy, JP, Dobson, S, Solomon, KR (2000) Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment for Roundup® Herbicide. Pages 35–120 in Ware, GW, ed. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. New York: Springer CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2020) International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://weedscience.org. Accessed: March 20, 2020Google Scholar
Kurtz, ME, Street, JE (2003) Response of rice (Oryza sativa) to glyphosate applied to simulate drift. Weed Technol 17:234–238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, R, Ronning, D, Clarke, M, Mayfield, A, Walker, S, Ouzman, J (2016) Impact of Weeds in Australian Grain Production. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Grains Research and Development Corporation. 112 p Google Scholar
Manalil, S, Ali, HH, Chauhan, BS (2018) Germination ecology of Sonchus oleraceus L. in the northern region of Australia. Crop Pasture Sci 69:926–932 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manalil, S, Ali, HH, Chauhan, BS (2020) Interference of annual sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) in wheat. Weed Sci 68:98–103 Google Scholar
Menegat, A, Bailly, GC, Aponte, R, Heinrich, GMT, Sievernich, B, Gerhards, R (2016). Acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) amino acid substitution Asp376Glu in Lolium perenne: effect on herbicide efficacy and plant growth. J Plant Dis Prot 123:145–153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobli, A, Matloob, A, Chauhan, BS (2019) The response of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of annual sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) to mungbean density. Weed Sci 67:642–648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeem, MA, Abbas, T, Tanveer, A, Maqbool, R, Zohaib, A, Shehzad, MA (2017) Glyphosate hormesis in broad-leaved weeds: a challenge for weed management. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:344–351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nascentes, RF, Carbonari, CA, Simões, PS, Brunelli, MC, Velini, ED, Duke, SO (2018) Low doses of glyphosate enhance growth, CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance and transpiration in sugarcane and eucalyptus. Pest Manag Sci 74:1197–1205 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozturk, L, Yazici, A, Eker, S, Gokmen, O, Römheld, V, Cakmak, I (2008) Glyphosate inhibition of ferric reductase activity in iron deficient sunflower roots. New Phytol 177:899–906 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, IL, Hansen, HCB, Ravn, HW, Sørensen, JC, Sørensen, H (2007) Metabolic effects in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) seedlings after root exposure to glyphosate. Pestic Biochem Phys 89:220–229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J, Neser, JM and Dresbach-Runkel, M (2008) Resistant factors of target-site and metabolic resistant blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.) biotypes against different ACC-ase-inhibitors. J Plant Dis Protect 21 (SP):25–30 Google Scholar
Roider, CA, Griffin, JL, Harrison, SA, Jones, CA (2007) Wheat response to simulated glyphosate drift. Weed Technol 21:1010–1015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitsch, T, Balibrea, ME, Hofmann, M, Proels, R, Sinha, AK (2003) Extracellular invertase: key metabolic enzyme and PR protein. J Exp Bot 54:513–524 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, LE, Pezeshki, R (2015) Glyphosate in runoff waters and in the root-zone: a review. Toxics 3:462–480 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, FML, Duke, SO, Dayan, FE, Velini, ED (2016) Low doses of glyphosate change the responses of soyabean to subsequent glyphosate treatments. Weed Res 56:124–136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinrücken, HC, Amrhein, N (1980) The herbicide glyphosate is a potent inhibitor of 5-enolpyruvylshikimic acid-3-phosphate synthase. Biochem Bioph Res Co 94:1207–1212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, LY, Cruz, AD, Moore, PH, Maretzki, A (1992) The relationship of glyphosate treatment to sugar metabolism in sugarcane: new physiological insights. J Plant Physiol 140:168–173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velini, ED, Alves, E, Godoy, MC, Mechede, DK, Souzaand, RT, Duke, SO (2008) Glyphosate at low doses can stimulate plant growth. Pest Manag Sci 64:489–496 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velini, ED, Trindade, ML, Barberis, LRM, Duke, SO (2010) Growth regulation and other secondary effects of herbicides. Weed Sci 58:351–354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widderick, MJ, Walker, SR, Sindel, BM, Bell, KL (2010) Germination, emergence, and persistence of Sonchus oleraceus, a major crop weed in subtropical Australia. Weed Biol Manag 10:102–112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, TM, Grover, R, Wallace, K, Shewchuk, SR, Maybank, J (1993) Effect of protective shields on drift and deposition characteristics of field sprayers. Can J Plant Sci 73:1261–1273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar