Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-5q6g5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-17T08:59:39.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Fusarium lateritium as a Biological Herbicide for Controlling Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and Prickly Sida (Sida spinosa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. Douglas Boyette  and
H. Lynn Walker
C. Douglas Boyette
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Stoneville, MS, 38776
H. Lynn Walker
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Stoneville, MS, 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In greenhouse studies, Fusarium lateritium Nees ex Fr. was effective in suppressing the growth of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic. # ABUTH) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP). Sprays containing conidia of the fungus and fungus-infested sodium alginate-kaolin clay granules controlled both weeds in corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), and soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] without causing a reduction in dry weight of the crops. In field tests, postemergence foliar applications of the fungus controlled velvetleaf and prickly sida 40 and 80%, respectively, in 1982, but controlled only 27 and 34% of velvetleaf and prickly sida, respectively, in 1983. Preemergence applications of the fungus in the granule formulation controlled velvetleaf and prickly sida 46 and 59%, respectively, in 1982. In 1983, this treatment controlled the weeds 35 and 38%, respectively.

Keywords

Bioherbicidebiological weed controlmycoherbicidemicrobial herbicidesodium alginateABUTHSIDSP

Information

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 106 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Crawley, D. K. and Walker, H. L. 1983. Interactions of two fungal pathogens of spurred anoda. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. (Abstr.) 36:136.Google Scholar
2. Boyette, C. D. and Walker, H. L. 1983. Evaluation of Fusarium lateritium for controlling velvetleaf and prickly sida. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. (Abstr.) 36:138.Google Scholar
3. Boyette, C. D. and Walker, H. L. 1985. Factors influencing biocontrol of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and prickly sida (Sida spinosa). Weed Sci. 33:209–211.Google Scholar
4. Hagood, E. S. Jr., Bauman, T. T., Williams, J. L., and Schreiber, M. M. 1980. Growth analysis of soybeans (Glycine max) in competition with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 28:729–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:224–228.Google Scholar
6. Walker, H. L. 1981. Fusarium lateritium: A pathogen of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 29:629–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Walker, H. L. and Connick, W. J. Jr. 1983. Sodium alginate for production and formulation of mycoherbicides. Weed Sci. 31:333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar