Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T10:50:47.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diverse Approaches to Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Micheal D. K. Owen
Micheal D. K. Owen*
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: mdowen@iastate.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Herbicides have been the principal means of weed control in developed countries for approximately 50 yr because they are the most cost-effective method. Such general use of herbicides has resulted in weed resistance to herbicides, which continues to be a growing problem. Within the past decade, the evolution of resistance to the once-dominant herbicide glyphosate has resulted in major concerns about the future ability to control weeds in many crop systems. Moreover, many weed species have evolved resistance to multiple mechanisms of herbicide action. Given the dearth of new herbicides with novel mechanisms of action, it appears inevitable that weed management programs will need to be supplemented by the use of tactics other than herbicides. However, the inclusion of more diversity for weed management also introduces complexity, cost, and time constraints to current crop production systems. This paper describes broadly the considerations, opportunities, and constraints of diverse weed management tactics to address the burgeoning problems with herbicide resistance.

Keywords

Diversityherbicide resistancestrategiestacticsweed management
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 64 , Issue S1: Special Issue: Human Dimensions of Herbicide Resistance , 2016 , pp. 570 - 584
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by the Weed Science Society of America

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Sarah Ward, Colorado State University.

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, RL (2005) A multi-tactic approach to manage weed population dynamics in crop rotations. Agron J 97: 1679–1583Google Scholar
Anonymous (2015) Farms and Land in Farms 2014 Summary. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 20 pGoogle Scholar
Arbuckle, JR (2014) Farmer Perspectives on Pesticide Resistance. Report RM 3070. Ames, IA: Iowa State University. 8 pGoogle Scholar
Arbuckle, JR, Lasley, P (2013) Iowa Farm and Rural Life Poll: 2013 Summary Report. Report PM 3061. Ames, IA: Iowa State University. 20 pGoogle Scholar
Baker, HG (1974) The evolution of weeds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5: 1–24Google Scholar
Baker, HG (1991) The continuing evolution of weeds. Econ Bot 45: 445–449Google Scholar
Baldwin, FL, Santelmann, PW (1980) Weed science in integrated pest management. BioScience 30: 675–678Google Scholar
Bates, RT, Gallagher, RS, Curran, WS, Harper, JK (2012) Integrating mechanical and reduced chemical weed control in conservation tillage corn. Agron J 104: 507–512Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ (2006) Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol 20: 793–814Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Reboud, X (2009) Selecting for weed resistance: herbicide rotation and mixture. Weed Technol 23: 363–370Google Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Harker, KN, O'Donovan, JT, Beckie, HJ, Smith, EG (2008) Ongoing development of integrated weed management systems on the Canadian prairies. Weed Sci 56: 146–150Google Scholar
Bottrell, DG (1979) Integrated Pest Management. Berkeley, CA: Consortium for International Crop Protection. 121 pGoogle Scholar
Brodt, S, Klonsky, K, Tourte, L, Duncan, R, Hendricks, L, Ohmart, C, Verdegall, P (2004) Influence of farm management style on adoption of biologically integrated farming practices in California. Renew Agr Food Syst 19: 237–247Google Scholar
Brookes, G (2014) Weed control changes and genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops in the USA 1996–2012. GM Crops Food: Biotechnol Agric Food Chain 5: 321–332Google Scholar
Buhler, DD (1999) Expanding the context of weed management. New York: Haworth Press. 289 pGoogle Scholar
Buhler, DD, Gunsolus, JL, Ralston, DF (1992) Integrated weed management techniques to reduce herbicide inputs in soybean. Agron J 84: 973–978Google Scholar
Buhler, DD, Liebman, M, Obrycki, JJ (2000) Theoretical and practical challenges to an IPM approach to weed management. Weed Sci 48: 274–280Google Scholar
Busi, R, Gaines, TA, Walsh, MJ, Powles, SB (2012) Understanding the potential for resistance evolution to the new herbicide pyroxasulfone: field selection at high doses versus recurrent selection at low doses. Weed Res 52: 489–499Google Scholar
Busi, R, Neve, P, Powles, S (2013) Evolved polygenic herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum by low-dose herbicide selection within standing genetic variation. Evol Appl 6: 231–242Google Scholar
Busi, R, Powles, SB (2009) Evolution of glyphosate resistance in a Lolium rigidum population by glyphosate selection at sublethal doses. Heredity 103: 318–325Google Scholar
Busi, R, Powles, SB (2011) Reduced sensitivity to paraquat evolves under selection with low glyphosate doses in Lolium rigidum. Agron Sust Devel 31: 525–531Google Scholar
Busi, R, Vila-Aiub, MM, Powles, SB (2011) Genetic control of a cytochrome P450 metabolism-based herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum. Heredity 106: 817–824Google Scholar
Cerdeira, AL, Duke, SO (2006) The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: a review. J Environ Qual 35: 1633–1658Google Scholar
Chikowo, R, Faloya, V, Petit, S, Munier-Jolain, NM (2009) Integrated weed management systems allow reduced reliance on herbicides and long-term weed control. Agr Ecosyst Environ 132: 237–242Google Scholar
Davis, AS, Hall, JC, Jasieniuk, M, Locke, MA, Lushei, EC, Mortensen, DA, Riechers, DE, Smith, RG, Sterling, TM, Westwood, JH (2009) Weed science research and funding: a call to action. Weed Sci 57: 442–448Google Scholar
Davis, AS, Hill, JD, Chase, CA, Johanns, AM, Liebman, M (2012) Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health. Plos One 7: e47149Google Scholar
De Bruin, JL, Pedersen, P (2008) Effect of row spacing and seeding rate on soybean yield. Agron J 100: 704–710Google Scholar
De Bruin, JL, Pedersen, P (2009) Growth, yield, and yield component changes among old and new soybean cultivars. Agron J 101: 124–130Google Scholar
De Bruin, JL, Porter, PM, Jordan, NR (2005) Use of a rye cover crop following corn in rotation with soybean in the upper midwest. Agron J 97: 587–598Google Scholar
Delye, C, Jasieniuk, M, Le Corre, V (2013) Deciphering the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds. Trends Genet 29: 649–658Google Scholar
DeVore, JD, Norsworthy, JK, Brye, KR (2012) Influence of deep tillage and a rye cover crop on glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) emergence in cotton. Weed Technol 26: 832–838Google Scholar
DeVore, JD, Norsworthy, JK, Brye, KR (2013) Influence of deep tillage, a rye cover crop, and various soybean production systems on Palmer amaranth emergence in soybean. Weed Technol 27: 263–270Google Scholar
DeWerff, RP, Conley, SP, Colquhoun, JB, Davis, VM (2014) Can soybean seeding rate be used as an integrated component of herbicide resistance management? Weed Sci 62: 625–636Google Scholar
Dion, FA, inventor; AzDiOll, Fred, assignee (1948) 2 April 1948. Auxiliary grain separator for combines. U.S. patent 2617425. 1948 April 2Google Scholar
Doohan, D, Wilson, R, Canales, E, Parker, J (2010) Investigating the human dimension of weed management: new tools of the trade. Weed Sci 58: 503–510Google Scholar
Duke, SO (2012) Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years? Pest Manag Sci 68: 505–512Google Scholar
Duke, SO, Powles, SB (2008) Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pest Manag Sci 64: 319–325Google Scholar
Duke, SO, Powles, SB (2009) Glyphosate-resistant crops and weeds: now and in the future. AgBioForum 12: 346–357Google Scholar
Ervin, D, Jussaume, R (2014) Integrating social science into managing herbicide-resistant weeds and associated environmental impacts. Weed Sci 62: 1–12Google Scholar
Ervin, DE, Carriere, Y, Cox, WJ, Fernandez-Cornejo, J, Jussaume, RA Jr, Marra, MC, Owen, MDK, Raven, PH, Wolfenbarger, LL, Zilberman, D (2010) The Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Sustainability in the United States. Washington, DC: National Research Council. 250 pGoogle Scholar
Evans, JA, Tranel, PJ, Hager, AG, Schutte, B, Wu, C, Chatham, LA, Davis, AS (2015) Managing the evolution of herbicide resistance. Pest Manag Sci 72: 74–80Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J, Hendricks, C, Mishra, A (2005) Technology adoption and off-farm household income: the case of herbicide-tolerant soybeans. J Agr Appl Econ 37: 549–563Google Scholar
Frisvold, GB, Hurley, TM, Mitchell, PD (2009) Adoption of best management practices to control weed resistance by corn, cotton, and soybean growers. AgBioForum 12: 370–381Google Scholar
Frisvold, GB, Reeves, JM (2010) Resistance management and sustainable use of agricultural biotechnology. AgBioForum 13: 343–359Google Scholar
Gardner, JG, Nehring, RF, Nelson, CH (2009) Genetically modified crops and household labor savings in US crop production. AgBioForum 12: 303–312Google Scholar
Gianessi, LP (2013) The increasing importance of herbicides in worldwide crop production. Pest Manag Sci 69: 1099–1105Google Scholar
Gould, F (1991) The evolutionary potential of crop pests. Am Sci 79: 496–507Google Scholar
Green, JM, Owen, MDK (2011) Herbicide-resistant crops: utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management. J Agr Food Chem 59: 5819–5829Google Scholar
Greiner, R, Gregg, D (2011) Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy 28: 257–265Google Scholar
Gressel, J (1991) Why get resistance? It can be prevented or delayed. Pages 1–26in Caseley, JC, Cussons, GW, Atkin, RK, eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Oxford: Butterworth-HeinemannGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J (2009) Evolving understanding of the evolution of herbicide resistance. Pest Manag Sci 65: 1164–1173Google Scholar
Gressel, J (2011) Low pesticide rates may hasten the evolution of resistance by increasing mutation frequencies. Pest Manag Sci 67: 253–257Google Scholar
Gressel, J, Levy, AA (2014) Use of multicopy transposons bearing unfitness genes in weed control: four example scenarios. Plant Physiol 166: 1221–1231Google Scholar
Gunsolus, JL (1990) Mechanical and cultural weed control in corn and soybean. Am J Altern Agric 5: 114–119Google Scholar
Gunsolus, JL, Buhler, DD (1999) A risk management perspective on integrated weed management. Pages 167–187in Buhler, DD, ed. Expanding the Context of Weed Management. Binghampton, NY: Food Products PressGoogle Scholar
Hails, RS (2005) Assessing the impact of genetically modified crops on agricultural biodiversity. Minerva Biotecnol 17: 13–20Google Scholar
Harker, KN, O'Donovan, JT, Blackshaw, RE, Beckie, HJ, Mallory-Smith, C, Maxwell, BD (2012) Our view. Weed Sci 60: 143–144Google Scholar
Harper, JL (1956) The evolution of weeds in relation to resistance to herbicides. Pages 179–188in Kasasian, L, ed. Proceedings of the 3rd British Weed Control Conference. Farnham, United Kingdom: British Weed Control CouncilGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, RG, Van Kooten, BD, Stoltenberg, DE, Hall, EM, Fawcett, RS (1993) On-farm evaluation of mechanical and chemical weed management practices in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 7: 1001–1004Google Scholar
Harvey, RG (1991) Integrated management systems for “resistant” weeds. Pages 89–90in Proceedings of the North Central Weed Science Society. Indianapolis, IN: North Central Weed Science Society [Abstract]Google Scholar
Heap, I (2015) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.com. Accessed July 13, 2015Google Scholar
Hershenhorn, J, Zion, B, Smirnov, E, Weissblum, A, Shamir, N, Dor, E, Achdari, G, Ziadna, H, Shilo, A (2015) Cyperus rotundus control using a mechanical digger and solar radiation Weed Res 55: 42–50Google Scholar
Hurley, TM, Mitchell, PD, Frisvold, GB (2009a) Characteristics of herbicides and weed-management programs most important to corn, cotton, and soybean growers. AgBioForum 12: 269–280Google Scholar
Hurley, TM, Mitchell, PD, Frisvold, GB (2009b) Effects of weedresistance concerns and resistance-management practices on the value of Roundup Ready crops. AgBioForum 12: 291–302Google Scholar
Hurley, TM, Mitchell, PD, Frisvold, GB (2009c) Weed management costs, weed best management practices and the Roundup Ready weed management program. AgBioForum 12: 281–290Google Scholar
Johnson, WG, Gibson, KD (2006) Glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies: an Indiana grower perspective. Weed Technol 20: 768–772Google Scholar
Kelner, D, Derksen, D (1996) Integrated weed management—making it work on your farm. http://www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=39788bcd-7dfa-4a47-8ab7-043419efecd5. Accessed November 22, 2012Google Scholar
Klümper, W, Qaim, M (2014) A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. Plos One 9:e111629Google Scholar
Korres, NE, Norsworthy, JK (2015) Influence of a rye cover crop on the critical period for weed control in cotton. Weed Sci 63: 346–352Google Scholar
LeBaron, HM (2008) Distribution and management of triazine-resistant weeds. Pages 119–132in LeBaron, HM, McFarland, JE, Burnside, OC, eds. The Triazine Herbicides: 50 Years Revolutionizing Agriculture. San Diego, CA: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M, Gallandt, ER (1997) Many little hammers: ecological approaches for management of crop-weed interactions. Pages 291–343in Jackson, LE, ed. Ecology in Agriculture. San Diego, CA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M, Gibson, LR, Sundberg, DN, Heggenstaller, AH, Westerman, PR, Chase, CA, Hartzler, RG, Menalled, FD, Davis, AS, Dixon, PM (2008) Agronomic and economic performance characteristics of conventional and low-external-input cropping systems in the central corn belt. Agron J 100: 600–610Google Scholar
Llewellyn, RS, Lindner, RK, Pannell, DJ, Powles, SB (2004) Grain grower perceptions and use of integrated weed management. Aust J Exp Agric 44: 993–1001Google Scholar
Longchamps, L, Panneton, B, Simard, M-J, Leroux, GD (2012) Could weed sensing in corn inter-rows result in efficient weed control? Weed Technol 26: 649–656Google Scholar
Lovely, WG, Weber, CR, Staniforth, DW (1958) Effectiveness of the rotary hoe for weed control in soybeans. Agron J 50: 621–625Google Scholar
Manalil, S, Busi, R, Renton, M, Powles, SB (2011) Rapid evolution of herbicide resistance by low herbicide dosages. Weed Sci 59: 210–217Google Scholar
Manalil, S, Renton, M, Diggle, A, Busi, R, Powles, SB (2012) Simulation modelling identifies polygenic basis of herbicide resistance in a weed population and predicts rapid evolution of herbicide resistance at low herbicide rates. Crop Prot 40: 114–120Google Scholar
McElroy, JS (2014) Vavilovian mimicry: Nikolai Vavilov and his little-known impact on weed science. Weed Sci 62: 207–216Google Scholar
McMullan, PM, Green, JM (2011) Identification of a tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype resistant to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides, atrazine, and thifensulfuron in Iowa. Weed Technol 25: 514–518Google Scholar
Mortensen, DA, Egan, JF, Maxwell, BD, Ryan, MR, Smith, RG (2012) Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. BioScience 62: 75–84Google Scholar
Norris, RF (1999) Ecological implications of using thresholds for weed management. J Crop Prod 2: 31–58Google Scholar
Norris, RF (2007) Weed fecundity: current status and future needs. Crop Prot 26: 182–188Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, G, Griffin, T, Bagavathiannan, M, Gbur, EE (2014) In-field movement of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and its impact on cotton lint yield: evidence supporting a zero-threshold strategy. Weed Sci 62: 237–249Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Oliveira, MJ (2004) Comparison of the critical period for weed control in wide- and narrow-row corn. Weed Sci 52: 802–807Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60: 31–62Google Scholar
Oerke, EC (2006) Crop losses to pests. J Agr Sci 144: 31–43Google Scholar
Owen, MDK (1997) Risks and benefits of weed management technologies. Pages 291–297in De Prado, R, Jorrin, J, Garcia-Torres, L, eds. Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides. London: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
Owen, MDK (2001) World maize/soybean and herbicide resistance. Pages 101–163in Powles, SB, Shaner, DL, eds. Herbicide Resistance and World Grains. Boca Raton: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
Owen, MDK (2008) Weed species shifts in glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manag Sci 64: 377–387Google Scholar
Owen, MDK (2012) Herbicide resistance in weeds: What is nature of the problem? Pages 3–4in Proceedings of the National Summit on Strategies to Manage Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. Washington, DC: National Academies PressGoogle Scholar
Owen, MDK (2013) Pest resistance: overall principles and implications on evolved herbicide resistance in Iowa. Pages 125–136in Pringnitz, B, ed. Proceedings of the 2013 Integrated Crop Management Conference. Ames, IA: Iowa State UniversityGoogle Scholar
Owen, MDK, Beckie, HJ, Leeson, JY, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE (2015) Integrated pest management and weed management in the United States and Canada. Pest Manag Sci 71: 357–376Google Scholar
Patzoldt, WL, Tranel, PJ, Hagar, AG (2005) A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype with multiple resistance across three herbicide sites of action. Weed Sci 53: 30–36Google Scholar
Peteinatos, GG, Weis, M, Andujar, D, Rueda, V, Gerhards, A, Gerhards, l (2014) Potential use of ground-based sensor technologies for weed detection. Pest Manag Sci 70: 190–199Google Scholar
Pichancourt, J-B, van Klinken, RD (2012) Phenotypic plasticity influences the size, shape and dynamics of the geographic distribution of an invasive plant. Plos One 7: e32323Google Scholar
Powles, SB (2008) Evolved glyphosate-resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. Pest Manag Sci 64: 360–365Google Scholar
Prince, JM, Shaw, DR, Givens, WA, Newman, ME, Owen, MDK, Weller, SC, Young, BG, Wilson, RG, Jordan, DL (2012) Benchmark Study: III. Survey on changing herbicide use patterns in glyphosate-resistant cropping systems. Weed Technol 26: 536–542Google Scholar
Prokopy, LS, Floress, K, Klotthor-Weinkauf, D, Baumgart-Getz, A (2008) Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: evidence from the literature. J Soil Water Conserv 63: 300–311Google Scholar
Reimer, AP, Thompson, AW, Prokopy, LS (2012) The multidimensional nature of environmental attitudes among farmers in Indiana: implications for conservation adoption. Agric Hum Values 29: 29–40Google Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE, Stephenson DO, IV, Eubank, TW, Bond, J, Scott, RC (2013) Adoption of best management practices for herbicide-resistant weeds in midsouthern United States cotton, rice, and soybean. Weed Technol 27: 788–797Google Scholar
Rich, AM, Renner, KA (2007) Row spacing and seeding rate effects on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) and soybean. Weed Technol 21: 124–130Google Scholar
Sayer, J, Sunderland, T, Ghazoul, J, Pfund, J-L, Sheil, D, Meijaard, E, Venter, M, Boedhihartono, AK, Day, M, Garcia, C, van Oosen, C, Buck, LE (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 8349–8356Google Scholar
Shaner, DL (2014) Lessons learned from the history of herbicide resistance. Weed Sci 62: 427–431Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, S (2013) Deep Tillage and Cover Crops for Palmer Amaranth. Davis, CA: University of California Davis. 3 p. http://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=10319. Accessed February 25, 2016Google Scholar
Stern, VM, Smith, RF, van den Bosch, R, Hagen, KS (1959) The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29: 81–101Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Mahoney, KJ, Chandler, K, Gulden, RH (2008) Integrated weed management: knowledge-based weed management systems. Weed Sci 56: 168–172Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Murphy, SD (1996) Weed science beyond the weeds: the role of integrated weed management (IWM) in agroecosystem health. Weed Sci 44: 437–445Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Weise, SF (1991) Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol 5: 648–656Google Scholar
Switon, SM (2005) Economics of site-specific weed management. Weed Sci 53: 259–263Google Scholar
Thill, DC, Lish, JM, Callihan, RH, Bechinski, EJ (1991) Integrated weed management—a component of integrated pest management: a critical review. Weed Technol 5: 648–656Google Scholar
Tranel, PJ, Wright, TR (2002) Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Sci 50: 700–712Google Scholar
Ulloa, SM, Datta, A, Malidza, G, Leskovsek, R, Knezevic, SZ (2010) Timing and propane dose of broadcast flaming to control weed population influenced yield of sweet maize (Zea mays L. var. rugosa). Field Crop Res 118: 282–288Google Scholar
VanGessel, MJ (2001) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Science 49: 703–705Google Scholar
Vasileiadis, VP, Moonen, AC, Sattin, M, Otto, S, Pons, X, Kudsk, P, Veres, A, Dorner, Z, van der Weide, R, Marraccini, E, Plelzer, E, Angevin, F, Kiss, J (2013) Sustainability of European maize-based cropping systems: economic, environmental and social assessment of current and proposed innovative IPM-based systems. Eur J Agron 48: 1–11Google Scholar
Vasileiadis, VP, Otto, S, van Dijk, W, Urek, G, Leskovsek, R, Verschwele, A, Furlan, L, Sattin, M (2015) On-farm evaluation of integrated weed management tools for maize production in three different agro-environments in Europe: agronomic efficacy, herbicide use reduction, and economic sustainability. Eur J Agron 63: 71–78Google Scholar
Vencill, WK, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Soteres, JK, Mallory-Smith, C, Burgos, NR, Johnson, WG, McClelland, MR (2012) Herbicide resistance: toward an understanding of resistance development and the impact of herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Sci 60: 2–30Google Scholar
Vigueira, CC, Olsen, KM, Caicedo, AL (2013) The red queen in corn: agricultural weeds as models of rapid adaptive evolution. Heredity 110: 303–311Google Scholar
Walker, RH, Buchanan, GA (1982) Crop manipulation in integrated weed management systems. Weed Sci 30: 17–24Google Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Harrington, RB, Powles, SB (2012) Harrington seed destructor: a new nonchemical weed control tool for global grain crops. Crop Sci 52: 1343–1347Google Scholar
Ward, SM, Cousens, RD, Bagavathiannan, MV, Barney, JN, Beckie, HJ, Busi, R, Davis, AS, Dukes, JS, Forcella, F, Freckleton, RP, Gallandt, ER, Hall, LM, Jasieniuk, M, Lawton-Rauh, A, Lehnhoff, EA, Liebman, M, Maxwell, BD, Mesgaran, MB, Murray, JV, Neve, P, Nunez, MA, Pauchard, A, Queenborough, SA, Webber, BL (2014) Agricultural weed research: a critique and two proposals. Weed Sci 62: 672–678Google Scholar
Weersink, A, Llewelln, RS, Pannell, DJ (2005) Economics of preemptive management to avoid weed resistance to glyphosate in Australia. Crop Prot 24: 659–665Google Scholar
Wilson, RS, Tucker, MA, Hooker, NH, Lejeune, JT, Doohan, D (2008) Perceptions and beliefs about weed management: perspectives of Ohio grain and produce farmers. Weed Technol 22: 339–350Google Scholar
Wooton, EO (1894) New Mexico Weeds. New Mexico College of Agriculture and the Mechanical Arts. Bulletin No. 1. Las Cruces, NM: Agricultural Experiment Station. 46 pGoogle Scholar
Wurtz, TL (1995) Domestic geese: biological weed control in an agricultural setting. Ecol Appl 5: 570–578Google Scholar
Young, BG (2006) Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 20: 301–307Google Scholar
Young, SL (2012) True integrated weed management. Weed Res 52: 107–111Google Scholar
Young, SL, Pierce, FJ (2014) Automation: The Future of Weed Control in Cropping Systems. New York: Springer. 265 pGoogle Scholar
Zalucki, MP, Furlong, MJ, Schellhorn, NA, Macfadyen, S, Davies, AP (2015) Assessing the impact of natural enemies in agroecosystems: toward “real” IPM or in quest of the Holy Grail? Insect Sci 22: 1–5Google Scholar