Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:24:01.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pesticide regulation in the European Union and the glyphosate controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2020

Per Kudsk Open the ORCID record for Per Kudsk [Opens in a new window]  and
Solvejg Kopp Mathiassen
Per Kudsk*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Flakkebjerg, Denmark
Solvejg Kopp Mathiassen
Affiliation:
Senior Scientist, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Flakkebjerg, Denmark
*
Author for correspondence: Per Kudsk, Dept. of Agroecology, Aarhus University, DK-4200Slagelse, Denmark Email: per.kudsk@agro.au.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The glyphosate controversy before the renewal of the authorization of glyphosate in the European Union (EU) once again turned the spotlight on pesticide regulation in the EU. In the EU, pesticides are attracting more public attention than in other parts of the world, and many nongovernmental organizations specifically target pesticide regulation, trying to influence politicians and other decision makers. Following an overview of the EU pesticide legislation and the impact hitherto on EU agriculture, this paper outlines the glyphosate controversy and presents the outcome of desk studies conducted in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Sweden on the potential effects of a glyphosate ban on agricultural productivity and farm income. All studies concluded that the loss of income depends very much on farm type and cropping practice, but they all reached the conclusion that particularly no-tillage farming/conservation agriculture will be facing severe problems without glyphosate to control weeds and terminate cover crops. No-tillage/conservation agriculture is viewed as an effective strategy to prevent soil erosion and loss of nutrients, which could become larger problems without glyphosate. Other issues highlighted in the studies were the impact on resistance management, as glyphosate is largely seen as a “herbicide-resistance breaker.” Without glyphosate, fundamental changes in farming practices in the EU are required, and it is hard to imagine that they will come without a cost, at least in the short term.

Keywords

Impact studypesticide banRegulation 1107/2009Sustainable Use Directive

Information

Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Science , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , May 2020 , pp. 214 - 222
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Associate Editor: William Vencill, University of Georgia

References

Anonymous (2017) The Impact of a Glyphosate Ban on UK Economy. Oxford Economics and the Andersons Centre. https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/recent-releases/The-impact-of-a-glyphosat-ban-on-the-UK-economy. Accessed: July 30, 2019Google Scholar
Barzman, M, Bàrberi, P, Birch, NE, Boonekamp, P, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S, Graf, B, Hommel, B, Jensen, JE, Kiss, J, Kudsk, P, Lamichhane, JR, Messéan, A, Moonen, AC, Ratnadass, A, Ricci, P, et al. (2015) Eight principles of integrated pest management. Agron Sustain Dev 35:1199–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collavo, A, Sattin, M (2014) First glyphosate-resistant Lolium spp. biotypes found in European annual arable cropping system also affected by ACCase and ALS resistance. Weed Res 54:325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, LR, Hull, R, Moss, S, Neve, P (2019) The first cases of glyphosate resistance in UK poverty brome (Bromus sterilis) populations. Weed Sci 67:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donley, N (2019) The USA lags behind other agricultural nations in banning harmful pesticides. Environ Health 18, 10.1186/s12940-019-0488-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duke, SO, Powles, SB (2008) Glyphosate: a once in-a-century herbicide. Pest Manag Sci 64:319–325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duke, SO, Powles, SB, Sammons, RD (2018) Glyphosate—how it became a once in a hundred year herbicide and its future. Outlooks Pest Manag 29:247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[EC] European Commission (2018) Study Supporting the REFIT Evaluation of the EU Legislation on Plant Protection Products and Pesticides Residues (Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7244480c-d34d-11e8-9424-01aa75ed71a1. Accessed: August 15, 2019Google Scholar
European Environment Agency (2018) Pesticide Sales. https://www.eea.europa.eu/airs/2018/environment-and-health/pesticides-sales. Accessed: August 19, 2019Google Scholar
Hillocks, RJ (2012) Farming with fewer pesticides: EU pesticide review and resulting challenges for UK agriculture. Crop Prot 31:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, C, Johnson, F, Widén, P, Andersson, R, Manduric, S, Olofsson, S, Hallgren, S, Söderberg, T, Håkansson, B, Elmquist, H, Jansson, E, Åsman, K, Björkman, M (2019) Vilka effekter kan ett glyfosatförbud medföra? Jönköping, Sweden: Jordbruksverket Rapport 2019:8. https://www2.jordbruksverket.se/download/18.5d8be3c816b70986878429d8/1561023146067/ra19_8.pdf. Accessed: August 22, 2019Google Scholar
Kehlenbeck, H, Saltzmann, J, Schwarz, J, Zwerger, P, Nordmeyer, H (2016) Economic assessment of alternatives for glyphosate application in arable farming. Julius-Kuhn-Archiv 451:279–289Google Scholar
Kehlenbeck, H, Saltzmann, J, Schwarz, J, Zwerger, P, Nordmeyer, H, Rossberg, D, Karpinski, I, Strassemeyer, J, Golla, B, Freier, B (2015) Folgenabschatzung fur die Landwirtschaft zum teilweisen oder vollstandigen Verzicht auf die Anwendung von glyphosathaltigen Herbiziden in Deutschland. Julius-Kuhn-Archiv 451:1–156Google Scholar
Lamichhane, JR, Arendse, W, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S, Kudsk, P, Roman, J, van Bijsterveldt-Gels, J.E, Wick, M, Messéan, A (2015) Challenges and opportunities for integrated pest management in Europe: a telling example of minor uses. Crop Prot 74:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamichhane, JR, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh, S, Kudsk, P, Messean, A (2016) Towards a reduced reliance on conventional pesticides in European agriculture. Plant Dis 100:10–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapierre, M, Sauquet, A, Julie, S (2019) Improving Farm Environmental Performance through Technical Assistance: Empirical Evidence on Pesticide Use. CEE-M Working Papers hal-02190979. Montpellier, France: CEE-M, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro. https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/wpceem/hal-02190979.html. Accessed August 20, 2019Google Scholar
Løkke, S, Christensen, P (2008) The introduction of the precautionary principle in Danish environmental policy: the case of plant growth retardants. J Agric Environ Ethics 21:229–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melander, B, Munier-Jolain, N, Charles, R, Wirth, J, Schwarz, J, van der Weide, R, Bonin, L, Jensen, PK, Kudsk, P (2013) European perspectives on the adoption of non-chemical weed management in reduced tillage systems for arable crops. Weed Technol 127:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, S, Ulber, L, den Hoed, I (2019) A herbicide resistance risk matrix. Crop Prot 115:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelaez, V, da Silva, LR, Araújo, EB (2013) Regulation of pesticides: a comparative analysis. Sci Public Policy 40:644–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reboud, X, Blanck, M, Aubertot, JN, Jeuffroy, MH, Munier-Jolain, N, Thiollet-Scholtus, M (2017) Usages et alternatives au glyphosate dans l’agriculture française. Rapport INRA à la saisine Ref TR507024. 85 p. https://inra-dam-front-resources-cdn.brainsonic.com/ressources/afile/418767-54570-resource-rapport-glyphosate-inra.pdf. Accessed: July 30, 2019Google Scholar
Schulte, M, Theuvsen, L, Wiese, A, Steinmann, HH (2016) Die ökonomische Bewertung von Glyphosat im Deutschen Ackerbau. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/244761?ln=en. Accessed: August 15, 2019Google Scholar
Stehle, S, Schultz, R (2015) Pesticide authorization in the EU—environment unprotected. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:19632–19647CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinmann, HH (2013) Glyphosat—ein Herbizid in der Diskussion und die Suche nach dem “Notwendigen Mass.” Gesunde Pflanz 65:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmann, HH, Wiese, A, Schulte, LA, Koning, L, Theuvsen, L, Gerowitt, B (2015) Agronomic consequences of glyphosate use—field and farm studies from Germany. Page 143 in Proceedings 18: International Plant Protection Congress: Mission Possible: Food for All through Appropriate Plant Protection. Berlin: German Phytomedical Society/Julius Kühn-Institut/Agriculture Industry AssociationGoogle Scholar
Wiese, A, Schulte, M, Theuvsen, L, Steinmann, HH (2018) Interactions of glyphosate use with farm characteristics and cropping patterns in Central Europe. Pest Manag Sci 74:1155–1165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zubrod, JP, Englert, D, Feckler, A, Koksharova, N (2015) Does the current fungicide risk assessment provide sufficient protection for key drivers in aquatic ecosystem functioning? Environ Sci Technol 49:1173–1183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed