Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T10:01:20.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contribution of Side Chains to Karbutilate Mode of Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. S. Hammerschlag ,
J. L. Hilton ,
P. G. Bartels  and
D. E. Moreland
R. S. Hammerschlag
Affiliation:
Agr. Environ. Qual. Inst., Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agr., Beltsville, MD 20705
J. L. Hilton
Affiliation:
Agr. Environ. Qual. Inst., Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agr., Beltsville, MD 20705
P. G. Bartels
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
D. E. Moreland
Affiliation:
Southern Region, Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agr., Crop Sci. Dep., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27607
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inhibition of seedling growth and four assays for inhibition of photosynthesis were used to compare karbutilate [tert-butylcarbamic acid ester with 3-(m-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea] with derivatives of karbutilate in which either the urea or carbamate side chain was missing. Karbutilate was a more potent, more presistent, and more specific inhibitor of photosynthesis than the phenylurea derivative fenuron (1,1-dimethyl-3-phenylurea) that would be formed by removal of the carbamate side chain. However, karbutilate did not exert the growth-inhibiting action observed for the alkyl carbamate derivative phenyl-N-tert-butylcarbamate, formed by removal of the urea side chain, which does not affect photosynthesis at concentrations below 10-3 M.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , September 1975 , pp. 425 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Cooke, A.C. 1956. A possible mechanism of action of the urea herbicides. Weeds 4:397–398.Google Scholar
2. Gentner, W.A. and Hilton, J.L. 1960. Effect of sucrose on the toxicity of several phenylurea herbicides to barley. Weeds 8:413–417.Google Scholar
3. Hilton, J.L. and Christiansen, M.N. 1972. Lipid contribution to selective action of trifluralin. Weed Sci. 20:290–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hilton, J.L., Scharen, A.L., St. John, J.B., Moreland, D.E., and Norris, K.H. 1969. Modes of action of pyridazinone herbicides. Weed Sci. 17:541–547.Google Scholar
5. Moreland, D.E. and Boots, M.R. 1971. Effects of optically active 1-(α-methylbenzyl)-3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)urea on reactions of mitochondria and chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 47:53–58.Google Scholar
6. St. John, J.B., Bartels, P.G., and Hilton, J.L. 1974. Surfactant effects on isolated plant cells. Weed Sci. 22:233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Van Oorschot, J.L.P. 1965. Selectivity and physiological inactivation of some herbicides inhibiting photosynthesis. Weed Res. 5:84–97.Google Scholar
8. Weed Science Society of America. 1974. Pages 397–399, Terbutol in Herbicide Handbook 3rd ed. Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
9. Wessels, J.S.C. and van der Veen, R. 1956. The action of some derivatives of phenylurethan and of 3-phenyl-1,1-dimethylurea on the Hill reaction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 19:548–549.Google Scholar