No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 January 2009
The note claims that Rosen's arguments about distribution and aggregation do not support his central claim, either in their own terms or as a reading of Bentham; and suggests a different account of the relation of the objective to the subjective in Bentham.
1 Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, Harvard, 1971, p. 27Google Scholar.