Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T18:56:30.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organic Stupor Subsequent to a Severe Head Injury Treated with E.C.T.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Maurice Silverman
Maurice Silverman*
Affiliation:
Blackburn Group of Hospitals
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Roth and Rosie (1953) discussed the beneficial effect of E.C.T. in a wide range of psychoses complicated by clouding of consciousness, including syndromes of frankly organic origin. The treatment has been used effectively for psychotic symptoms in G.P.I. (Ewald and Haddenbrock, 1942; Bini, 1947; Solomon et al., 1948; Yaskin, 1948; Kalinowsky, 1949; Lopez Ibor, 1950), pellagra and pernicious anaemia (Fernandes and Polonio, 1946). It is perhaps not surprising that a search through the literature has failed to bring to light a case of stupor subsequent to a head injury being treated with E.C.T.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 110 , Issue 468 , September 1964 , pp. 648 - 650
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1964 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C. (1942). Lancet, ii, 1.Google Scholar
Bint, L. (1947). Rassegna di neuropsichiat., 1, 11.Google Scholar
Brock, S. (1940). Injuries to the Skull and Spinal Cord. London.Google Scholar
Ewald, G., and Haddenbrock, S. (1942). Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 174, 626.Google Scholar
Fernandes, B., and Polonio, P. (1946). J. Ment. Sci., 92, 794.Google Scholar
Guttmann, E. (1946). Ibid., 92, I.Google Scholar
Hemphill, R. E., and Walter, W. G. (1941). Ibid., 87, 256.Google Scholar
Ibor, , Lopez, J. J. (1950). Congrès International de Psychiat., Paris. IV. Thérapeutique Biologique. Indications Respectives des Méthodes de Choc., 85–120.Google Scholar
Kalinowsky, L. B. (1949). Bull. N. T. Acad. Med., 25, 541.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. J. (1942). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 25, 601.Google Scholar
Moruzzi, G., and Magoun, H. W. (1949). Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1, 455.Google Scholar
Negulici, E., Cortez, P., and Cortez, M. (1960). Neurologia (Bucharest), 5, 2.Google Scholar
Roth, M. (1951). Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 3, 261.Google Scholar
Roth, M. (1952). J. Ment. Sci., 98, 44.Google Scholar
Roth, M. and Rosie, J. M. (1953). Ibid., 99, 103.Google Scholar
Russell, W. R. (1934). Edin. med. J., 41, 129.Google Scholar
Solomon, H. C., Rose, A. D., and Arnot, R. E. (1948). J. new. ment. Dis., 107, 377.Google Scholar
Symonds, C. P. (1942). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 35, 601.Google Scholar
Symonds, C. P. (1952). “Psychoses—traumatic psychoses.” In: British Encyclopaedia of Medical Practice (ed.: Horder, Lord). 10, 427–434. London.Google Scholar
Wechsler, I. S. (1935). J.A.M.A., 104, 519.Google Scholar
Yaskin, J. G. (1948). Amer. J. Psychiat., 105, 66.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.