Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T07:46:36.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aberrant controllability of functional connectome during working memory tasks in patients with schizophrenia and unaffected siblings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2025

Feiwen Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Zhening Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Ju Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Xiao Li
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Yunzhi Pan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Jun Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Peng Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Fuping Sun
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Wenjian Tan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Danqing Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Jiamei Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Xiawei Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Maoxing Zhong
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Guowei Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Jie Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, and National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
Lena Palaniyappan
Affiliation:
Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada Robarts Research Institute, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
*
Correspondence: Jie Yang. Email: yang0826@csu.edu.cn

Abstract

Background

Working memory deficit, a key feature of schizophrenia, is a heritable trait shared with unaffected siblings. It can be attributed to dysregulation in transitions from one brain state to another.

Aims

Using network control theory, we evaluate if defective brain state transitions underlie working memory deficits in schizophrenia.

Method

We examined average and modal controllability of the brain's functional connectome in 161 patients with schizophrenia, 37 unaffected siblings and 96 healthy controls during a two-back task. We use one-way analysis of variance to detect the regions with group differences, and correlated aberrant controllability to task performance and clinical characteristics. Regions affected in both unaffected siblings and patients were selected for gene and functional annotation analysis.

Results

Both average and modal controllability during the two-back task are reduced in patients compared to healthy controls and siblings, indicating a disruption in both proximal and distal state transitions. Among patients, reduced average controllability was prominent in auditory, visual and sensorimotor networks. Reduced modal controllability was prominent in default mode, frontoparietal and salience networks. Lower modal controllability in the affected networks correlated with worse task performance and higher antipsychotic dose in schizophrenia (uncorrected). Both siblings and patients had reduced average controllability in the paracentral lobule and Rolandic operculum. Subsequent out-of-sample gene analysis revealed that these two regions had preferential expression of genes relevant to bioenergetic pathways (calmodulin binding and insulin secretion).

Conclusions

Aberrant control of brain state transitions during task execution marks working memory deficits in patients and their siblings.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baddeley, A. Working memory. Science 1992; 255(5044): 556–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agnew-Blais, J, Seidman, LJ. Neurocognition in youth and young adults under age 30 at familial risk for schizophrenia: a quantitative and qualitative review. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2013; 18(1–2): 4482.Google Scholar
Braff, DL, Greenwood, TA, Swerdlow, NR, Light, GA, Schork, NJ. Advances in endophenotyping schizophrenia. World Psychiatry 2008; 7(1): 11–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Kringelbach, ML, Deco, G. Brain states and transitions: insights from computational neuroscience. Cell Rep 2020; 32(10): 108128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menon, V, Uddin, LQ. Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct Funct 2010; 214(5–6): 655–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, U, Schäfer, A, Walter, H, Erk, S, Romanczuk-Seiferth, N, Haddad, L, et al. Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112(37): 11678–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Shine, JM, Bissett, PG, Bell, PT, Koyejo, O, Balsters, JH, Gorgolewski, KJ, et al. The dynamics of functional brain networks: integrated network states during cognitive task performance. Neuron 2016; 92(2): 544–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J, Pu, W, Wu, G, Chen, E, Lee, E, Liu, Z, et al. Connectomic underpinnings of working memory deficits in schizophrenia: evidence from a replication fMRI study. Schizophr Bull 2020; 46(4): 916–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Braun, U, Harneit, A, Pergola, G, Menara, T, Schäfer, A, Betzel, RF, et al. Brain network dynamics during working memory are modulated by dopamine and diminished in schizophrenia. Nat Commun 2021; 12(1): 3478.Google ScholarPubMed
Wu, C, Zheng, Y, Li, J, Zhang, B, Li, R, Wu, H, et al. Activation and functional connectivity of the left inferior temporal gyrus during visual speech priming in healthy listeners and listeners with schizophrenia. Front Neurosci 2017; 11: 107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, U, Schäfer, A, Bassett, DS, Rausch, F, Schweiger, JI, Bilek, E, et al. Dynamic brain network reconfiguration as a potential schizophrenia genetic risk mechanism modulated by NMDA receptor function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113(44): 12568–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Q, Yao, L, You, W, Liu, J, Deng, S, Li, B, et al. Controllability of functional brain networks and its clinical significance in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2023; 49(3): 659–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Gu, S, Pasqualetti, F, Cieslak, M, Telesford, QK, Yu, AB, Kahn, AE, et al. Controllability of structural brain networks. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 8414.Google ScholarPubMed
Jeganathan, J, Perry, A, Bassett, DS, Roberts, G, Mitchell, PB, Breakspear, M. Fronto-limbic dysconnectivity leads to impaired brain network controllability in young people with bipolar disorder and those at high genetic risk. Neuroimage Clin 2018; 19: 7181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, W, Ryali, S, Pasumarthy, R, Talasila, V, Menon, V. Dynamic causal brain circuits during working memory and their functional controllability. Nat Commun 2021; 12(1): 3314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, H, Jiang, R, Dai, W, Dufford, AJ, Noble, S, Spann, MN, et al. Network controllability of structural connectomes in the neonatal brain. Nat Commun 2023; 14(1): 5820.Google ScholarPubMed
Park, MTM, Jeon, P, French, L, Dempster, K, Chakravarty, MM, MacKinley, M, et al. Microstructural imaging and transcriptomics of the basal forebrain in first-episode psychosis. Transl Psychiatry 2022; 12(1): 358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Power, JD, Cohen, AL, Nelson, SM, Wig, GS, Barnes, KA, Church, JA, et al. Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 2011; 72(4): 665–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, Z, Rolls, ET, Liu, Z, Zhang, K, Yang, M, Du, J, et al. Brain annotation toolbox: exploring the functional and genetic associations of neuroimaging results. Bioinformatics 2019; 35(19): 3771–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Leucht, S, Samara, M, Heres, S, Patel, MX, Furukawa, T, Cipriani, A, et al. Dose equivalents for second-generation antipsychotic drugs: the classical mean dose method. Schizophr Bull 2015; 41(6): 1397–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, S, He, N, Liu, Z, Linli, Z, Tao, H, Palaniyappan, L. Brain-wide functional dysconnectivity in schizophrenia: parsing diathesis, resilience, and the effects of clinical expression. Can J Psychiatry 2020; 65(1): 21–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mizuno, Y, Wartelsteiner, F, Frajo-Apor, B. Resilience research in schizophrenia: a review of recent developments. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2016; 29(3): 218–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xi, C, Liu, Z, Zeng, C, Tan, W, Sun, F, Yang, J, et al. The centrality of working memory networks in differentiating bipolar type I depression from unipolar depression: a task-fMRI study. Can J Psychiatry 2023; 68(1): 2232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menon, V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci 2011; 15(10): 483506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niendam, TA, Laird, AR, Ray, KL, Dean, YM, Glahn, DC, Carter, CS. Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2012; 12(2): 241–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pu, W, Luo, Q, Palaniyappan, L, Xue, Z, Yao, S, Feng, J, et al. Failed cooperative, but not competitive, interaction between large-scale brain networks impairs working memory in schizophrenia. Psychol Med 2016; 46(6): 1211–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Q, Pan, B, Gu, H, Simmonite, M, Francis, S, Liddle, PF, et al. Effective connectivity of the right anterior insula in schizophrenia: the salience network and task-negative to task-positive transition. Neuroimage Clin 2020; 28: 102377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlösser, R, Gesierich, T, Kaufmann, B, Vucurevic, G, Hunsche, S, Gawehn, J, et al. Altered effective connectivity during working memory performance in schizophrenia: a study with fMRI and structural equation modeling. Neuroimage 2003; 19(3): 751–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Honey, GD, Bullmore, ET, Soni, W, Varatheesan, M, Williams, SC, Sharma, T. Differences in frontal cortical activation by a working memory task after substitution of risperidone for typical antipsychotic drugs in patients with schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96(23): 13432–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fransson, P, Schiffler, BC, Thompson, WH. Brain network segregation and integration during an epoch-related working memory fMRI experiment. Neuroimage 2018; 178: 147–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Pasternak, T, Greenlee, MW. Working memory in primate sensory systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6(2): 97107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michalka, SW, Kong, L, Rosen, ML, Shinn-Cunningham, BG, Somers, DC. Short-term memory for space and time flexibly recruit complementary sensory-biased frontal lobe attention networks. Neuron 2015; 87(4): 882–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Zarghami, TS, Zeidman, P, Razi, A, Bahrami, F, Hossein-Zadeh, GA. Dysconnection and cognition in schizophrenia: a spectral dynamic causal modeling study. Hum Brain Mapp 2023; 44(7): 2873–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, F, Xi, C, Liu, Z, Deng, M, Zhang, W, Cao, H, et al. Load-dependent inverted U-shaped connectivity of the default mode network in schizophrenia during a working-memory task: evidence from a replication functional MRI study. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2022; 47(5): E341–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Borgwardt, SJ, Picchioni, MM, Ettinger, U, Toulopoulou, T, Murray, R, McGuire, PK. Regional gray matter volume in monozygotic twins concordant and discordant for schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 67(10): 956–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Chang, M, Womer, FY, Bai, C, Zhou, Q, Wei, S, Jiang, X, et al. Voxel-based morphometry in individuals at genetic high risk for schizophrenia and patients with schizophrenia during their first episode of psychosis. PLoS One 2016; 11(10): e0163749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, KS, Cooke, SF, Xu, W. Experience-dependent equilibration of AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission during the critical period. Cell Rep 2017; 18(4): 892904.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, SH, Zabolotny, JM, Huang, H, Lee, H, Kim, YB. Insulin in the nervous system and the mind: functions in metabolism, memory, and mood. Mol Metab 2016; 5(8): 589601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arruda, AL, Khandaker, GM, Morris, AP, Smith, GD, Huckins, LM, Zeggini, E. Genomic insights into the comorbidity between type 2 diabetes and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia (Heidelb) 2024; 10(1): 22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickman, DK, Davis, GW. The schizophrenia susceptibility gene dysbindin controls synaptic homeostasis. Science 2009; 326(5956): 1127–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material

Wang et al. supplementary material
Download Wang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.8 MB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.