Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-nhjpk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-23T09:28:34.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Galactic Halo and CDM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Michael R. Merrifield
Michael R. Merrifield*
Affiliation:
School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper reviews the available information on the central density distribution and shape of the Milky Way's halo. At present, there is no strong evidence that the Milky Way's halo properties conflict with the predictions of cold dark matter (CDM): a primordial central power law cusp can be accommodated by the observations, and the current constraints on flattening are also consistent with the predictions of the theory. If you want to pick a fight with CDM, then the Milky Way is probably not the place to do it.

Information

Type
Part 13: The Shapes and Extents of Dark Halos
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 220: Dark Matter in Galaxies , 2004 , pp. 431 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Binney, J. & Tremaine, S. 1987, Galactic Dynamics (Princeton: PUP).Google Scholar
Binney, J., Gerhard, O. & Spergel, D. 1997, MNRAS, 288, 365.Google Scholar
Binney, J.J. & Evans, N.W. 2001, MNRAS, 327, L27.Google Scholar
Buote, D. 2004, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Debattista, V.P., Gerhard, O. & Sevenster, M.N. 2002, 334, 355.Google Scholar
Debattista, V.P. & Sellwood, J.A. 2000, ApJ, 543, 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubinski, J. 1994, ApJ, 431, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englmaier, P. & Gerhard, O.E. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 512.Google Scholar
Ibata, R., Lewis, G.F., Irwin, M., Totten, E. & Quinn, T. 2001, ApJ, 551, 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, F.J. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 1023.Google Scholar
Klypin, A., Zhao, H.S. & Somerville, R.S. 2002, ApJ, 573, 597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijken, K. & Gilmore, G. 1991, ApJ, 367, L9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majewski, S.R. 2004, these proceedings.Google Scholar
Moore, B., et al. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 1147.Google Scholar
Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S. & White, S.D.M. 1996, ApJ, 462, 563.Google Scholar
Olling, R.P. & Merrifield, M.R. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olling, R.P. & Merrifield, M.R. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellwood, J.A. 2003, ApJ, 587, 638.Google Scholar
Sevenster, M.N. 1999, MNRAS, 310, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, M.D. & Katz, N. 2002, ApJ, 580, 627.Google Scholar