Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-trf7k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-20T10:22:52.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cosmic Ray Acceleration in the Presence of Losses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

H.J. Völk
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik Postfach 10 39 80 6900 Heidelberg - 1, W. Germany
G. E. Morfill
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik Postfach 10 39 80 6900 Heidelberg - 1, W. Germany
M. Forman
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik Postfach 10 39 80 6900 Heidelberg - 1, W. Germany

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Diffusive Fermi acceleration on hydromagnetic shock fronts is a fairly slow process: most scatterings are energetically neutral, only those across the velocity jump yield a first order acceleration. Thus energy losses of cosmic rays (CR) due to e.g. adiabatic cooling, ionising, Coulomb, or nuclear collisions, bremsstrahlung, synchrotron radiation, should play a role in limiting the acceleration, since most shocks are coupled with a loss region (HII regions, SNR's, galactic density wave, stellar wind shocks). In addition, for this process to be a local one in the galaxy, the magnetic irregularities must either be excited by the accelerated CR's or produced by a downstream source. This implies a finite wave build-up time during the shock life time. Nevertheless, in the loss free case, the time-asymptotic amplification is independent of the mean free path λ (or the diffusion coefficient κ) which only appears in the spatial scale for the CR intensity. To investigate the effects of losses, the CR diffusion equation is amended by a simple loss term f/τ, with an (energy dependent) loss time τ, f being the CR momentum distribution. For τ spatially homogeneous, a distributed source is required. Then acceleration is only effective if X ≡ 4κ/VS 2·τ ≲ 1, i.e. if the acceleration time tacc = 4κ/VS 2 is smaller than τ, on either side of the shock. As the Figure shows, also the spatial intensity profile is modified. Wave excitation in dense clouds is prohibitive. Even in a “warm” (T ≃ 104K) intercloud medium shock speeds VS ≳ 3×107 cm/sec are required to accelerate mildly relativistic particles. Waves from an upstream source (star) inside clouds should frictionally dissipate after distances L ≲ 5×1014 cm « λ (10 MeV) if a solar wind scaling is adopted. Thus, presumably in such a case there is no acceleration of stellar or shock-injected particles through a stellar wind shock by scattering within the cloud, but possibly by reflection from beyond the cloud, the condition being 1/τ · VS ≲ 1, where 1 is the linear cloud size. Diffusive approach from outside to a standing shock appears to be very energy-selective, even in a loss free medium.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1981 

References

Axford, W.I., et al.: 1977, Proceedings 15th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Plovdiv, 11, 132.Google Scholar
Bell, A.R.: 1978a, MNRAS, 182, 147; 1978b, MNRAS, 182, 443.Google Scholar
Blandford, R.D., and Ostriker, J.P.: 1978, Ap. J. Lett., 221, L29.Google Scholar
Cesarsky, C.J., and Völk, H.J.: 1978, Astron. Astrophys. 70, 367.Google Scholar
Jokipii, J.R., 1968, Ap. J., 152, 799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulsrud, R.M., 1978, Copenhagen Univ. Obs. pp. 428, 317.Google Scholar
Lee, M.A. and Völk, H.J.: 1973, Astrophys. Space Sci., 24, 31.Google Scholar