Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T07:10:23.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Word Unit in Second Language Speech Production and Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

James Emil Flege  and
Murray J. Munro
James Emil Flege
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Murray J. Munro
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study, which focused on the word taco as spoken in Spanish and English, was to explore the word as a unit in second language (L2) speech acquisition. As expected, acoustic measurements revealed that Spanish and English monolinguals' renditions of taco differed systematically. It was also shown that the extent to which Spanish/English bilinguals approximated English phonetic norms for any one segment of taco was correlated with their approximation for the other three segments, and that early learners differentiated Spanish versus English taco more than did late learners. It also appeared that the bilinguals produced /t/ with less English-like voice onset time (VOT) values in English taco than in other English words without a cognate in Spanish. In a perception experiment, listeners were able to identify the native language of Spanish and English monolinguals on the basis of their production of taco. The listeners heard larger differences between Spanish and English taco tokens spoken by early than late learners of English L2. Two additional perception experiments assessed further the phonetic dimensions that listeners use to determine language identity and to gauge bilinguals' speech production accuracy. Listeners assigned to language identification and goodness rating tasks responded to acoustic information distributed over all four segments in taco, although the VOT of the word-initial /t/ appeared to be the single most important phonetic dimension. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that (a) bilinguals' accuracy in producing the various segments of a second language word may be interrelated and (b) in judging L2 speech, listeners respond to phonetic errors distributed over the entire word.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 381 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ansel, B., & Kent, R. (1992). Acoustic-phonetic contrasts and intelligibility in the dysarthria associated with mixed cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 296–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckman, M., & Edwards, J. (1992). Intonational categories and the articulatory control of duration. In Tohkura, Y., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Sagisaka, Y. (Eds.), Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure (pp. 359–376). Tokyo: Ohmsha.Google Scholar
Briere, E., Campbell, R., & Soemarmo, N. (1983). A need for the syllable in contrastive analysis. In Robinett, B. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Second language learning, contrastive analysis, error analysis, and related aspects (pp. 63–72). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., & Brones, I. (1979). Lexical access in bilinguals. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 212–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. (1992). On cognates. Second Language Research, 8, 93–119.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (1992). Dialect acquisition. Language, 68, 673–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, R. (1980). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese children and adults learning English as a second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1, 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, R. (1981). Perception of fluent speech by children and adults. In Winitz, H. (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 92–109). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Cristoffanini, P., Kirsner, K., & Milech, D. (1986). Bilingual lexical representations: The status of Spanish-English cognates. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 367–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalbor, J. (1980). Spanish pronunciation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1966). A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 4, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J. (1989). Connectionist approaches to acoustic/phonetic processing. In Marslen-Wilson, M. (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 227–260). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, J., Diehl, R., & Buchwald, S. (1977). Perceptual switching in bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esling, J., & Wong, R. (1983). Voice quality settings and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C., & Farwell, C. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language, 51, 418–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 692–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. (1989). Differences in inventory size affect the location but not the precision of tongue positioning in vowel production. Language and Speech, 32, 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., & Davidian, R. (1984). Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., & Eefting, W. (1986). Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica, 43, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J., & Eefting, W. (1987). The production and perception of English stops by Spanish speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., & Eefting, W. (1988). Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: Evidence for phonetic category formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 729–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J., & Fletcher, K. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J., & Hammond, R. (1982). Mimicry of non-distinctive phonetic differences between language varieties. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., & Port, R. (1981). Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech, 24, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatbonton, E. (1983). Patterned phonetic variability in second language speech: A gradual diffusion model. In Robinett, B. & Schachter, J. (Eds.), Second language learning, contrastive analysis, error analysis, and related aspects (pp. 240–255). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental & metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F., & Soares, C. (1986). Processing mixed languages: Some preliminary findings. In Vaid, J. (Ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neurophysiological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hammerly, H. (1982). Contrastive phonology and error analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolers, P. (1965). Bilingualism and bicodalism. Language and Speech, 8, 122–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolers, P. (1966). Reading and talking bilingually. American Journal of Psychology, 3, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W., Havelka, J., and Gardner, R. (1959). Linguistic manifestations of bilingualism. American Journal of Psychology, 72, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, J. (1986). F0 pattern interference in the perceptual acquisition of second language tone. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 59–80). Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L., & Ritterman, S. (1971). Articulation of /s/ as a function of cluster and word frequency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 476–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time. Language and Speech, 10, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1971). Distinctive features and laryngeal control. Language, 47, 767–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macken, M., & Ferguson, C. (1981). Phonological universals in language acquisition. In Winitz, H. (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 110–129). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J., & Kushnir, S. (1971). Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, R. (1987). English voiceless stop production by speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, R. (1992). Losing English as a first language. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L. (1981). Theories of phonological development. In Winitz, H. (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 130–137). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Miller, J., & Volaitis, L. (1989). Effects of speaking rate on the perceived internal structure of phonetic categories. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 505–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsen, R. (1978). Toward measuring how well hearing-impaired children speak. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (1988). The relative accessibility of phonemes and syllables. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 541–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obler, L., & Albert, M. (1978). A monitor system for bilingual language processing. In Paradis, M. (Ed.), Aspects of bilingualism (pp. 156–164). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam.Google Scholar
Ohala, J., & Ohala, M. (1986). Testing hypotheses regarding the psychological manifestation of morpheme structure constraints. In Ohala, J. & Jaeger, J. (Eds.), Experimental phonology (pp. 239–252). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. (1979). Syllable timing in Spanish, English, and Finnish. In Hollein, H. & Hollein, P. (Eds.), Current issues in the phonetic sciences (pp. 331–345). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). The sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkerton-Hutchinson, S. (1973). An objective index of the English-Spanish pronunciation dimension. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Pitt, M., & Samuel, A. (1990a). Attentional allocation during speech perception: How fine is the focus? Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, M., & Samuel, A. (1990b). The use of rhythm in attending to speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 564–573.Google ScholarPubMed
Port, R., Dalby, J., & O'Dell, M. (1987). Evidence for mora timing in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81, 1574–1585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Port, R., & Mitleb, F. (1983). Segmental features and implementation in acquisition of English by Arabic speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, R., & Rotunno, R. (1979). Relation between voice-onset time and vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 654–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, B. (1984). Categorical perception: Issues, methods, and findings. In Lass, N. (Ed.), Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice (Vol. 10, pp. 243–335). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1989). Bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Soares, C., & Grosjean, F. (1984). Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: The effect of lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 12, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahta, S., Wood, M., & Lowenthal, K. (1981). Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to the second language. Language and Speech, 24, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terken, J. (1991). Fundamental frequency and perceived prominence of accented syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 1768–1776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weismer, G. (1979). Sensitivity of voice-onset time (VOT) measures to certain segmental features in speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 35–48.Google Scholar
Wenk, B. (1985). Speech rhythms. Language and Speech, 28, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, D., Abramson, A., Lisker, L., & Mody, M. (1990). Gradient effects of fundamental frequency on stop consonant voicing judgments. Phonetica, 47, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, L. (1979). The modification of speech perception and production in second-language learning. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuengler, J. (1985). Identity markers and L2 pronunciation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar