Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T14:35:25.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RECEPTIVE AND PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY LEARNING: The Effects of Reading and Writing on Word Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2005

Stuart Webb
Stuart Webb
Affiliation:
Koran Women's Junior College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of receptive and productive vocabulary learning on word knowledge. Japanese students studying English as a foreign language learned target words in three glossed sentences and in a sentence production task in two experiments. Five aspects of vocabulary knowledge—orthography, syntax, association, grammatical functions, and meaning and form—were each measured by receptive and productive tests. The study uses an innovative methodology in that each target word was tested in 10 different ways. The first experiment showed that, when the same amount of time was spent on both tasks, the reading task was superior. The second experiment showed that, when the allotted time on tasks depends on the amount of time needed for completion, with the writing task requiring more time, the writing task was more effective. If the second experiment represents authentic learning, then a stronger argument can be made to use productive vocabulary learning tasks over receptive tasks.I wish to acknowledge the generous input of the following people in the evolution of this paper: Paul Nation, Jonathan Newton, and Jim Dickie from Victoria University of Wellington, and the anonymous SSLA reviewers, for their helpful comments.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 33 - 52
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aitchison, J. (1994). Words in the mind. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bahns, J. (1993). Lexical collocations: A contrastive view. ELT Journal, 47, 56–63.Google Scholar
Channell, J. (1988). Psycholinguistic considerations in the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 83–96). London: Longman.
Crow, J. T. (1986). Receptive vocabulary acquisition for reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 70, 242–250.Google Scholar
Crow, J. T., & Quigley, J. R. (1985). A semantic field approach to passive vocabulary acquisition for reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 497–513.Google Scholar
Day, R. R., Omura, C., & Hiramatsu, M. (1991). Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 7, 541–551.Google Scholar
Dempster, F. N. (1987). Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentation on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 162–170.Google Scholar
Dupuy, B., & Krashen, S. D. (1993). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in French as a foreign language. Applied Language Learning, 4, 55–63.Google Scholar
Griffin, G. F. (1992). Aspects of the psychology of second language vocabulary list learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick, UK.
Griffin, G. F., & Harley, T. A. (1996). List learning of second language vocabulary. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 443–460.Google Scholar
Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207–223.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (1992). Retention of inferred and given word meanings: Experiments in incidental vocabulary learning. In P. Arnaud & H. Bejoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 113–125). London: Macmillan.
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51, 539–558.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. R., Stein, M. L., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 767–787.Google Scholar
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). A computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Laufer, B. (1997). What's in a word that makes it hard or easy? Intralexical factors affecting the difficulty of vocabulary acquisition. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 140–155). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary: Same or different? Applied Linguistics, 19, 255–271.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, I. S. P. (1999). A vocabulary size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 36–55.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Paribakht, T. S. (1998). The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning, 48, 365–391.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Shmueli, K. (1997). Memorizing new words: Does teaching have anything to do with it? RELC Journal, 28, 89–108.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meara, P. (1983). Word associations in a foreign language: A report on the Birkbeck Vocabulary Project. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 11, 29–38.Google Scholar
Melka, F. (1997). Receptive versus productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 84–102). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, G. A. (1999). On knowing a word. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 1–19.Google Scholar
Morgan, B. Q., & Oberdeck, L. M. (1930). Active and passive vocabulary. In E. W. Bagster-Collins (Ed.), Studies in modern language teaching (pp. 213–221). London: Macmillan.
Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237–270.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. McKeown & M. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pickering, M. (1982). Context-free and context-dependent vocabulary learning: An experiment. System, 10, 79–83.Google Scholar
Pitts, M., White, H., & Krashen, S. D. (1989). Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading: A replication of the Clockwork Orange study using second language acquirers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 5, 271–276.Google Scholar
Prince, P. (1996). Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 80, 478–493.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 77–89.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1998). Tracking the incidental acquisition of second language vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 48, 281–317.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1999). The relationship between TOEFL vocabulary items and meaning, association, collocation, and word class knowledge. Language Testing, 16, 189–216.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework: Word associations and verbal suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 17–36.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.Google Scholar
Seibert, L. C. (1930). An experiment on the relative efficiency of studying French vocabulary in associated pairs versus studying French vocabulary in context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 21, 297–314.Google Scholar
Soderman, T. (1993). Word associations of foreign language learners and native speakers: The phenomenon of a shift in response type and its relevance for lexical development. In H. Ringbom (Ed.), Near-native proficiency in English (pp. 91–182). Abo, Finland: Abo Akademi University English Department Publications.
Stoddard, G. D. (1929). An experiment in verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 20, 452–457.Google Scholar
Waring, R. (1997a). A comparison of the receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of some second language learners. Immaculata [occasional papers of Notre Dame Seishin University, Okayama], 1, 53–68.Google Scholar
Waring, R. (1997b). A study of receptive and productive learning from word cards. Studies in Foreign Languages and Literature, 21, 94–114.Google Scholar
Waring, R. (1999). Tasks for assessing second language receptive and productive vocabulary. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wales, Swansea, UK.
Webb, S. A. (2002). Investigating the effects of learning tasks on vocabulary knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, NZ.