Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-h4f6x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T12:29:22.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MORPHOLOGY AND LONGER DISTANCE DEPENDENCIES

LaboratoryResearch Illuminating the A in SLA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1997

Nick C. Ellis
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Bangor
Richard Schmidt
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i at Manoa

Abstract

This paper illustrates the advantages of laboratory research into SLA by describing twostudies of acquisition of second language syntax. The first addresses the question of whetherhuman morphological abilities can be understood in terms of associative processes or whether itis necessary to postulate rule-based symbol processing systems underlying these skills. Wedemonstrate that acquisition of L2 morphology shows frequency effects for both regular andirregular forms and that the acquisition course of learners' accuracy and reaction time canbe accurately simulated by connectionist systems. The second concerns a bootstrapping accountof SLA whereby processes of chunking in phonological memory underpin the acquisition oflong-term memory for utterances and abstractions of grammatical regularities. It shows thatphonological short-term memory is particularly important in the acquisition of long-distancedependencies. In both cases, it is argued that these aspects of SLA reflect associative learningprocesses. When SLA research is properly focused on acquisition, laboratory research allowsinvestigation of the learners' exposure to evidence, their processes of perception andlearning, and their resultant language representations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This work was assisted bygrant R000236099 from the Economic and Social Research Council (UK) to the first author. Wethank Martin Wilson, Julie Ainscough, and Ernest Lee for help with administering theexperiments and Robert Bley-Vroman, Kevin Gregg, Robert DeKeyser, and Jan Hulstijn forcomments on a prior draft of this paper.