Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T05:41:27.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ACQUISITION OF PROGRESSIVE AND RESULTATIVE MEANINGS OF THE IMPERFECTIVE ASPECT MARKER BY L2 LEARNERS OF JAPANESE: Transfer, Universals, or Multiple Factors?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2007

Natsue Sugaya  and
Yasuhiro Shirai
Natsue Sugaya
Affiliation:
Niigata Sangyo University
Yasuhiro Shirai
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has been observed that there is a strong association between the inherent (lexical) aspect of verbs and the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (the aspect hypothesis; Andersen & Shirai, 1994). To investigate why such an association is observed, this study examined the influence of inherent aspect and learners' first language (L1) on the acquisition of Japanese imperfective aspect by using two tasks—an acceptability judgment test and an oral picture description task—with two groups of second language learners of Japanese: 26 native speakers (NSs) of English, which has the obligatory progressive, and 35 NSs of languages that have no obligatory progressive marking (German and Slavic languages). The results from the acceptability judgment test support the aspect hypothesis in that, regardless of L1, the imperfective marker -te i-ru was strongly associated with activity verbs for lower proficiency learners. However, the results from the oral task did not support the prediction, in that lower proficiency L1 nonprogressive learners did not show any such preference. The results suggest that L1 plays a role in the formation of the acquisition pattern predicted by the aspect hypothesis, but that given the complex interaction with task types and proficiency, L1 transfer cannot be the sole reason for the predicted association in the acquisition of Japanese -te i-(ru). It is argued that multiple factors are at work when learners create the form-meaning associations predicted by the aspect hypothesis.This article is based on research conducted as part of Sugaya's doctoral dissertation submitted to Ochanomizu University. We would like to thank Kevin Gregg, Yoshinori Sasaki, and the anonymous SSLA reviewers for their insightful comments on an earlier version of this article. We also thank Manabu Kurosawa for his invaluable advice on statistical analysis. We are grateful to Chie Morizuka, Hiromi Ozeki, Masuyo Sugiyama, Orie Takahashi, Yoko Mukoyama, Yukari Hashimoto, and the other participants of the seminar on SLA at Ochanomizu University for their helpful discussions of this study. We also thank the participants in the study for their cooperation and those who kindly helped us recruit them. This research is partially supported by a grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Developmental Index for Japanese L1 and L2 Acquisition and Comparative Research on the Acquisition of English and Japanese, grant No. 13410034, PI-Kiyoshi Otomo, Tokyo Gakugei University). A preliminary analysis of the acceptability judgment test appeared in Nihongo Kyooiku (Journal of Japanese Language Teaching; Sugaya, 2004).

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 1 - 38
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

3A Corporation (1998a). Minna no Nihongo: Vol. 1 [Japanese for everyone: Vol. 1]. Tokyo: 3A Corporation.
3A Corporation (1998b). Minna no Nihongo: Vol. 2 [Japanese for everyone: Vol. 2]. Tokyo: 3A Corporation.
Andersen, R.W. (1983). Transfer to somewhere. In S. M. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 177–201). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Andersen, R.W. (1984). The one to one principle of interlanguage construction. Language Learning, 34, 77–95.Google Scholar
Andersen, R.W. (2002). The dimensions of pastness. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 79–106). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133–156.Google Scholar
Andersen, R.W. & Shirai, Y. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego: Academic Press.
Anderson, J.R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: Freeman.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1995). A narrative perspective on the development of the tense-aspect system in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 263–291.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1998). Narrative structure and lexical aspect: Conspiring factors in second language acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 471–508.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics: Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 341–382.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2002a). A new starting point?: Investigating formulaic use and input in future expression. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 189–198.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2002b). Analyzing aspect. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 129–154). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bergström, A. (1996). The acquisition of tense and aspect in SLA and FLL: A study of learner narratives in English (SL) and French (FL). Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 308–330.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Reynolds, D.W. (1995). The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 107–131.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.
Collins, L. (1999). Marking time: The acquisition of tense and grammatical aspect by French-speaking learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Collins, L. (2002). The roles of L1 influence and lexical aspect in the acquisition of temporal morphology. Language Learning, 52, 43–94.Google Scholar
Collins, L. (2004). The particulars on universals: A comparison of the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology among Japanese- and French-speaking learners of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61, 251–274.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ebert, K.H. (2000). Progressive markers in Germanic languages. In Ö. Dahl (Ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (pp. 605–653). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Giacalone-Ramat, A. (2002). How do learners acquire the classical three categories of temporality? Evidence from L2 Italian. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 221–247). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Housen, A. (2002). The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 155–197). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ishida, M. (2004). The effect of recasts on acquisition of aspect in Japanese as a foreign language. Langauge Learning, 54, 311–394.Google Scholar
Kleinmann, H. (1977). Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 27, 93–107.Google Scholar
Koyama, S. (2003). Nihongo no tensu-asupekuto no syuutoku ni okeru huhensei to kobetusei: Bogo no yakuwari to eikyoo o tyuusin ni [Universality and variability in the acquisition of Japanese tense-aspect: Focusing on the role and effect of L1]. In S. Koyama, K. Otomo, & M. Nohara (Eds.), Gengo to kyooiku: Nihongo o taisyoo ni [Language and education: The case of Japanese] (pp. 415–436). Tokyo: Kurosio.
Kurono, A. (1995). Syokyuu nihongo gakusyuusya ni okeru -te i-ru no syuutoku ni tuite [On the acquisition of -te i-ru by novice learners of Japanese]. Nihongo Kyoiku [Journal of Japanese Language Teaching], 87, 153–164.Google Scholar
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lightbown, P.M. (1987). Classroom language as input to second language acquisition. In C. W. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 169–187). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Master, P.A. (1987). A cross-linguistic interlanguage analysis of the acquisition of the English article system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Möhle, D. & Raupach, M. (1989). Language transfer of procedural knowledge. In H. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Transfer in language productions (pp. 195–216). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Odlin, T. (2003). Cross-linguistic influence. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 436–485). Oxford: Blackwell.
O'Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pugh, S.M. & Press, I. (1999). Ukrainian: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
Robison, R.E. (1995). The aspect hypothesis revisited: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect marking in interlanguage. Applied Linguistics, 16, 344–370.Google Scholar
Rocca, S. (2002). Lexical aspect in child second language acquisition of temporal morphology: A bidirectional study. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 249–284). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Rohde, A. (1996). The aspect hypothesis and the emergence of tense distinctions in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Linguistics, 34, 1115–1137.Google Scholar
Salaberry, M.R. (2000). The development of past tense morphology in L2 Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Salaberry, M.R. & Shirai, Y. (2002). L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Sheu, S. (1997). Tyuu-zyookyuu taiwanzin nihongo gakusyuusya ni yoru te i-ru no syuutoku ni kansuru oodan kenkyuu [A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of -te i-ru by intermediate and advanced Taiwanese learners of Japanese]. Nihongo Kyooiku [Journal of Japanese Language Teaching], 95, 37–48.Google Scholar
Shibata, M. (1999). The use of Japanese tense-aspect morphology in L2 discourse narratives. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 2, 68–102.Google Scholar
Shibata, M. (2000). Function of tense-aspect morphemes in second language discourse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Shirai, Y. (1991). Primacy of aspect in language acquisition: Simplified input and prototype. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Shirai, Y. (1992). Conditions on transfer: A connectionist approach. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 3, 91–120.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1993). Inherent aspect and acquisition of tense/aspect morphology in Japanese. In H. Nakajima & Y. Otsu (Eds.), Argument structure: Its syntax and acquisition (pp. 67–82). Tokyo: Kaitakusya.
Shirai, Y. (1995). Tense-aspect marking by L2 learners of Japanese. In D. MacLauglin & S. McEwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development: Vol. 2 (pp. 575–586). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Shirai, Y. (1998a). Where the progressive and the resultative meet: Imperfective aspect in Japanese, Korean, Chinese and English. Studies in Language, 22, 661–692.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1998b). The emergence of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese: Universal predisposition? First Language, 18, 281–309.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (2000). The semantics of the Japanese imperfective -te i-ru: An integrative approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 327–361.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (2002). The aspect hypothesis in SLA and the acquisition of Japanese. Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 5, 42–61.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (2004). A multiple-factor account for the form-meaning connections in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 91–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shirai, Y. (2006). The acquisition of tense-aspect. In M. Nakayama, R. Mazuka, & Y. Shirai (Eds.), East Asian psycholinguistics: Vol. 2. Japanese (pp. 82–88). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R.W. (1995). The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71, 743–762.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Kurono, A. (1998). The acquisition of tense-aspect marking in Japanese as a second language. Language Learning, 48, 245–279.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. & Nishi, Y. (2005). How what we mean impacts how we talk: The Japanese imperfective aspect marker -te i-ru in conversation. In J. Frodesen & C. Holten (Eds.), The power of context in language learning and teaching (pp. 39–48). Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Slabakova, R. (1997). Bulgarian preverbs: Aspect in phrase structure. Linguistics, 35, 673–704.Google Scholar
Slobin, D.I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Slobin, D.I. (1993). Adult language acquisition: A view from child language study. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives (pp. 239–252). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D.I. (1997). The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 5. Expanding the contexts (pp. 265–323). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, C.S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Sugaya, N. (2003). Nihongo gakusyuusya no asupekuto syuutoku ni kansuru zyuudan kenkyuu: Doosa no zizoku to kekka no zyootai no -te i-ru o tyuusin ni [A longitudinal study on the acquisition of imperfective aspect morphology by L2 learners of Japanese: Focusing on the progressive and the resultative state use of -te i-ru]. Nihongo Kyooiku [Journal of Japanese Language Teaching], 119, 65–74.Google Scholar
Sugaya, N. (2004). Bunpootesto ni yoru Nihongo gakusyuusya no asupekuto syuutoku kenkyu: L1 no yakuwari no kentoo [A grammaticality judgment study on the acquisition of aspect by L2 learners of Japanese: The role of L1]. Nihongo Kyooiku [Journal of Japanese Language Teaching], 123, 56–65.Google Scholar
Uozumi, T. (1998). Tuiseki tyoosa ni mirareru -te i-ru no syuutoku zyookyoo [The acquisition of -te i-ru in the follow-up study]. In A. Ozaki (Ed.), Final report for the grant-in-aid for scientific research [Basic research on the development of speaking ability and environment of use in Japanese by researchers from overseas] (pp. 100–111). Nagoya: Nagoya University.
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Weist, R.M. (2002). The first language acquisition of tense and aspect: A review. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 21–78). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wode, H. (1978). Developmental sequences in naturalistic L2 acquisition. In E. M. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 101–117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. (Reprinted from Working Papers on Bilingualism, 11, pp. 1–31, 1976).
Zobl, H. (1980). The formal and developmental selectivity of L1 influence on L2 acquisition. Language Learning, 30, 43–57.Google Scholar