Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T10:07:52.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discourse Motivations for Some Cognitive Acquisition Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Roger W. Andersen  and
Yasuhiro Shirai
Roger W. Andersen
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Yasuhiro Shirai
Affiliation:
Daito Bunka University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper offers an alternative interpretation for what has been called the defective tense hypothesis, the primacy of aspect hypothesis, or simply the aspect hypothesis in the literature on first and second language acquisition of tense and aspect. The aspect hypothesis states that first and second language learners will initially be influenced by the inherent semantic aspect of verbs or predicates in the acquisition of tense and aspect markers associated with or affixed to these verbs. Our account focuses on the observation that adult native speakers also appear to adhere to this primacy of inherent semantic aspect in the relative quantitative distribution of tense-aspect markers in their speech. We argue that a small set of cognitive operating principles and the notion of prototypicality account for this behavior in learners. Moreover, we argue that these principles are a consequence of how learners and native speakers alike organize information and their perspectives on it in ongoing discourse.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 133 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aksu, A. A. (1978). Aspect and modality in the child's acquisition of the Turkish past tense. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1984). The One to One Principle of interlanguage construction. Language Learning, 34, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1986). The need for native language comparison data in interpreting second language data. Forum Lecture, 1986 TESOL Summer Institute, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1989a). La adquisición de la morfología verbal [The acquisition of verb morphology]. Lingüística, 1, 90–142. (English version available from the author)Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1989b). The theoretical status of variation in interlanguage development. In Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D., & Selinker, L. (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition: Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 46–64). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1989c). The “up” and “down” staircase in secondary language development. In Dorian, N. (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence. Studies in language contraction and death (pp. 385–394). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1990). Models, processes, principles, and strategies: Second language acquisition in and out of the classroom. In VanPatten, B. & Lee, J. F. (Eds.), Second language acquisition—Foreign language learning (pp. 45–78). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual matters. (Reprinted from IDEAL, 1988, 3, 111–138)Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In Huebner, T. & Ferguson, C. A. (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 305–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1992, 11). The insider's advantage. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of Italy,Siena.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W. (1993). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In Hyltenstam, K. & Viborg, A. (Eds.), Progression and regression in language (pp. 309–339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W., & Shirai, Y. (in press). Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/creole connection. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F., & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, 3, 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). The relationship of form and meaning: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bergström, A. (1993, 02). Tense and aspect in SLA and FLL Learner narratives in English (SL) and French (FL). Paper presented at the 3rd SLA-FLL Conference (Second language Acquisition–Foreign Language Learning), West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Reynolds, D. W. (1993, 03). The acquisition of tense, lexical aspect, and the effect of positive evidence. Paper presented at the 27th Annual TESOL convention, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Bayley, R. (1991, 12). Variation in interlanguage tense marking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bergström, A. (1993, 03). The expression of temporal reference by English speaking learners of French: Report on the cloze. Paper presented at the 13th meeting of Second Language Research Forum, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., & Harner, L. (1989). On the developmental contour of child language: A reply to Smith and Weist. Journal of Child Language, 16, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language, 56, 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckart, J. P., & Sinclair, H. (1973). Time, tense, and aspect. Cognition, 2, 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, S., & Timberlake, A. (1985). Tense, aspect, and mood. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 202–258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cushing, S. T. (1987). Use of verb morphology in the English interlanguage of a native speaker of Serahuli. Unpublished manuscript, Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Dahl, O. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Economides, P. J. (1985). The expression of tense and aspect in the English interlanguage of a Vietnamese child. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Flashner, V. (1982). The English interlanguage of three native speakers of Russian: Two perspectives. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1982). Tense-aspect-modality: The Creole prototype and beyond. In Hopper, P. (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics (pp. 115–163). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Givón, T. (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 14. Discourse and syntax (pp. 213–241). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. (1993). Distributional biases of verb morphology in native and non-native English discourse. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, M. (1987). Developmental patterns of past tense acquisition among foreign language learners of French. In VanPatten, B. (Ed.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 52–60). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. (1963). Action, emotion, and will. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kihlstedt, M. (in press). A longitudinal study of two university students' use of verb forms and functions in their French interlanguage. In Hammarberg, B. (Ed.), Problem, process, product in language learning: Papers from the Stockholm-Abo Conference, 21–2210, 1992. Stockholm: Institute of Linguistics, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Kumpf, L. (1982). Tense, aspect, and modality in interlanguage: A discourse-functional perspective. Paper presented at the 16th Annual TESOL convention, Honolulu, HA.Google Scholar
Kumpf, L. (1984). Temporal systems and universality in interlanguage: A case study. In Eckman, F. R., Bell, L. H., & Nelson, D. (Eds.), Universal of second language acquisition (pp. 132–143). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Labov, W., Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular (pp. 354–405). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, H. S. (1991). Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Sato, C. J. (1984). Methodological issues in interlanguage studies: An interactionist perspective, In Davies, A., Criper, C., & Howatt, A. P. R. (Eds.), Interlanguage (pp. 253–279). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. E. (1985). The Child Language Data Exchange System. Journal of Child Language, 12, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meisel, J. M. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural second language acquisition. In Pfaff, C. W. (Ed.), First and second language acquisition (pp. 206–224). New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Mishina, S. (1993). Second language acquisition of verb morphology by three Japanese speakers. Unpublished manuscript, Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. (1981). Events, processes, and states. In Tedeschi, P. J. & Zaenen, A. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 14. Tense and aspect (pp. 191–212). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, N. (1986). Tense/aspect in the English interlanguage of a native Mandarin speaker. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Ramsay, V. (1989a). The acquisition of the perfective/imperfective aspectual distinction by classroom learners. In Carlson, R., DeLancy, S., Gildea, S., Payne, D., & Saxena, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth meeting of the Pacific Linguistics conference (pp. 374–404). Eugene: University of Oregon, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ramsay, V. (1989b, 12). On the debate over the acquisition of aspect before tense: Setting the record straight. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ramsay, V. (1990). Developmental stages in the acquisition of the perfective and the imperfective aspects by classroom L2 learners of Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar
Rispoli, M., & Bloom, L. (1985). Incomplete and continuing: Theoretical issues in the acquisition of tense and aspect. Journal of Child Language, 12, 471–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robison, R. E. (1990). The primacy of aspect: Aspectual marking in English Interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, R. E. (1993). Aspectual marking in English interlanguage. A cross-sectional study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
Rosen, E. H. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In Moore, T. E. (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111–144). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1973). A fake NP squich. In Bailey, C. J. N. & Shuy, R. (Eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English (pp. 96–140). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, G. (1985). The expression of temporality in the English interlanguage of a native Hebrew speaker. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. (1983). Talking about the there and then: The emergence of displaced reference in parent-child discourse. In Nelson, K. E. (Ed.), Children's language (Vol. 4, pp. 1–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. (1990). The grammaticalization of tense and aspect in Tok Pisin and Sranan. Language Variation and Change, 2, 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1981). Tense variation in narrative. Language, 57, 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1990). The defective tense hypothesis: Is there a distributional bias in the input? Unpublished manuscript, Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y. (1991). Primacy of aspect in language acquisition: Simplified input and prototype. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y., & McGhee, R. (1988). An interlanguage analysis of a Japanese ESL learner. Unpublished manuscript, Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In Gleitman, L. R. & Wanner, E. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 128–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1249). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1980). The acquisition of time talk: Relations between child and adult grammars. Journal of Child Language, 7, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. S. (1983). A theory of aspectual choice. Language, 59, 479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. S., & Weist, R. M. (1987). On the temporal contour of child language: A reply to Rispoli and Bloom. Journal of Child Language, 14, 387–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephany, U. (1981). Verbal grammar in modern Greek early child language. In Dale, P. S. & Ingram, D. (Eds.), Child language: An international perspective (pp. 45–57). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. (1987). Tense/aspect: A longitudinal study of a native Spanish speaker. Unpublished manuscript, Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1989). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weist, R. M. (1989). Time concepts in language and thought: Filling the Piagetian void from two to five years. In Levin, I. & Zakay, D. (Ed.), Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective (pp. 63–118). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weist, R. M., Wysocka, H., & Lyytinen, P. (1991). A cross-linguistic perspective on the development of temporal systems. Journal of Child Language, 18, 67–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weist, R. M., Wysocka, H., Witkowska-Stadnik, K., Buczowska, E., & Konieczna, E. (1984). The defective tense hypothesis: On the emergence of tense and aspect in child Polish. Journal of Child Language, 11, 347–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenzell, V. E. (1989). Transfer of aspect in the English oral narratives of native Russian speaker. In Dechert, H. W. & Raupach, M. (Eds.), Transfer in language production (pp. 71–97). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Yoshitomi, A. (1992). Primacy of aspect: Additional support for the hypothesis based on an interlanguage analysis of a Chinese speaker's ESL. Unpublished manuscript, Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar