Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T13:52:37.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linguistic Autonomy in a Monolingual Social Imaginary: Social Work Practitioners’ Sense-making of the Role of Language in Migrant ‘Integration’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2025

Hanna Kara Open the ORCID record for Hanna Kara [Opens in a new window] ,
Camilla Nordberg Open the ORCID record for Camilla Nordberg [Opens in a new window] ,
Maija Jäppinen  and
Anna-Leena Riitaoja
Hanna Kara*
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Camilla Nordberg
Affiliation:
Åbo Akademi University, Vaasa, Finland
Maija Jäppinen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Anna-Leena Riitaoja
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
*
Corresponding author: Hanna Kara; Email: hanna.kara@helsinki.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article studies how public policies of migrant ‘integration’ are enacted and made sense of in the street-level welfare state from the perspective of social work practitioners performing integration work and with a focus on language and language skills acquisition. It draws from twenty-seven semi-structured individual interviews and reflective discussions after service user meetings with eleven social workers and social advisors in migrant integration services conducted between 2018 and 2019 in the Helsinki capital region of Finland. Results infer ambiguous, yet persistent, ideals of monolingualism in which Finnish language skills acquisition plays a central role and linguistic diversity turns into individual lack of skills and capacities through service user responsibilisation. Yet practitioners refer to the unfeasible situations this creates for service users as well as to their own struggles as practitioners within the monolingual service system.

Keywords

Finlandintegration worklinguistic diversitymigrationmonolingualism
Type
Article
Information
Social Policy and Society , First View , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Act on the Promotion of Immigrant Integration 1386/2010, https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2010/en20101386 (accessed 12 March 2024).Google Scholar
Administrative Procedure Act 434/2003, https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2003/en20030434 (accessed 12 March 2024).Google Scholar
Alisaari, J., Kaukko, M. and Heikkola, L.-M. (2022) ‘Kotoutuminen, kuuluvuus, kielitaito ja kaverit: opetushenkilöstön huolenilmauksia maahanmuuttotaustaisten oppilaiden osaamisesta ja mahdollisuuksista’, Kasvatus & Aika, 16, 2, 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boccagni, P. and Righard, E. (2020) ‘Social work with refugee and displaced populations in Europe: (dis)continuities, dilemmas, developments’, European Journal of Social Work, 23, 3, 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzungu, H. (2023) Language Discordant Social Work in a Multilingual World: The Space Between, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L. and Karlsson, J. C. (2002) Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
De Roo, P., Braeye, S. and De Moor, A. (2016) ‘Counterbalancing the integration policy for migrants through social work’, International Social Work, 59, 2, 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Era, R. and Mäkinen, K. (2022) ‘Worrying about migrant mothers in Finnish news journalism’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 12, 4, 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favell, A. (2019) ‘Integration: twelve propositions after Schinkel’, Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, S. W. and Wright, M. (2015) ‘Does mandatory integration matter?: effects of civic requirements on immigrant socio-economic and political outcomes’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41, 12, 1885–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, M. (2014) ‘Out of time: the temporal uncertainties of refused asylum seekers and immigration detainees’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40, 12, 1991–2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haapajärvi, L. (2022) ʼPitfalls of belonging-work: the dialectics of belonging and exclusion in Finnish immigrant integration policiesʼ, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 46, 14, 3058–3078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadj Abdou, L. (2019) ‘Immigrant integration: the governance of ethno-cultural differences’, Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirvonen, H. and Husso, M. (2012) ‘Living on a knife’s edge: temporal conflicts in welfare service work’, Time & Society, 21, 3, 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzinger, C. (2020) ‘“We don’t worry that much about language”: street-level bureaucracy in the context of linguistic diversity’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46, 9, 1792–1808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamali, M. and Jönsson, J. (2018) ‘Introduction: neoliberalism and social work in the Nordic welfare states’ in Kamali, M. and Jönsson, J. (eds.), Neoliberalism, Nordic Welfare States and Social Work: Current and Future Challenges, Abingdon: Taylor and Francis, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanas, A. and Kosyakova, Y. (2023) ‘Greater local supply of language courses improves refugees’ labor market integration’, European Societies, 25, 1, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kara, H., Jäppinen, M., Nordberg, C. and Riitaoja, A.-L. (2023) ‘The ethical performance of access and consent in ethnographic research on social work encounters with migrant-background service users’, Qualitative Social Work, 22, 4, 663–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kara, H. and Nordberg, C. (2023) ‘Configuring public service interpreting in Finland as a sentient professional practice and affirmative social service work: emotion in the work of public service interpreters’, Nordic Social Work Research, 13, 4, 563–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karinen, R., Luukkonen, T., Jauhola, L. and Määttä, S. (2020) Selvitys asioimistulkkauksen nykytilasta, Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriön julkaisuja 45.Google Scholar
Kofman, E., Sawitri, S. and Vacchelli, E. (2015) ‘Gendered perspectives on integration discourses and measures’, International Migration, 53, 4, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskinen, K., Vuori, J. and Leminen, A.-K. (2018) ‘Johdanto’, in Koskinen, K., Vuori, J. and Leminen, A.-K. (eds.), Asioimistulkkaus: monikielisen yhteiskunnan arkea, Tampere: Vastapaino, 7–28.Google Scholar
Kosyakova, Y., Kristen, C. and Spörlein, C. (2022) ‘The dynamics of recent refugees’ language acquisition: how do their pathways compare to those of other new immigrants?’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48, 5, 989–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Language Act 423/2003, https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2003/en20030423 (accessed 12 March 2024).Google Scholar
Masoud, A., Holm, G. and Brunila, K. (2021) ‘Becoming integrateable: hidden realities of integration policies and training in Finland’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25, 1, 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misje, T. (2022) ‘The precarious inclusion of homeless EU migrants in Norwegian public social welfare: moral bordering and social workers’ dilemmas’, Critical Social Policy, 42, 3, 448–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misje, T. (2023) Social Work(ers) and Homeless EU Migrants: Welfare Bordering in Norway. Doctoral dissertation, VID Specialized University.Google Scholar
Morrice, L., Tipp, L. K, Collyer, M. and Brown, R. (2021) ‘You can’t have a good integration when you don’t have a good communication’: English language learning among resettled refugees in the UK’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 34, 1, 681–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordberg, C. and Kara, H. (2022) ‘Unfolding occupational boundary work: public service interpreting in social services for structurally vulnerable migrant populations in Finland’, Just. Journal of Language Rights & Minorities, 1, 1–2, 137–162.Google Scholar
Nordberg, C., Hiitola, J., Kara, H. and Jäppinen, M. (2024) ‘Welfare state nationalism, family reunification and forced migrants´ strategies to surpass structural violence’, in Clarke, K., Lee Oliver, L. and Ranta-Tyrkkö, S. (eds.), Decolonising Social Work in Finland: Racialisation and Practices of Care, Bristol: Policy Press, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. (2016a) Linguistic Diversity and Social Justice: An Introduction to Applied Sociolinguistics, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. (2016b) ‘Monolingual ways of seeing multilingualism’, Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 11, 1, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. (2020) ‘Language and social justice’ in Stanlaw, J. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–7.Google Scholar
Piller, I. and Takahashi, K. (2011) ‘Linguistic diversity and social inclusion’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14, 4, 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöyhönen, S. and Simpson, J. (2021) ‘Contesting language policy for asylum seekers in the Northern periphery: the story of Tailor F’, Language Policy, 20, 2, 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratzmann, N. and Sahraoui, N. (2021) ‘Introduction: the (un)deserving migrant?: street-level bordering practices and deservingness in access to social services’, Social Policy and Society, 20, 3, 436–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, G. (2019) ‘Articulating language oppression: colonialism, coloniality and the erasure of Tibet’s minority languages’, Patterns of Prejudice, 53, 5, 487–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rytter, M. (2019) ‘Writing against integration: Danish imaginaries of culture, race and belonging’, Ethnos, 84, 4, 678–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saharso, S. (2019) ‘Who needs integration?: debating a central, yet increasingly contested concept in migration studies’, Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheibelhofer, E., Holzinger, C. and Draxl, A-K. (2021) ‘Linguistic diversity as a challenge for street-level bureaucrats in a monolingually-oriented organisation’, Social Inclusion, 9, 1, 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinkel, W. (2018) ‘Against ‘immigrant integration’: for an end to neocolonial knowledge production’, Comparative Migration Studies, 6, 31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2015) ‘Linguicism’ in C. Chapelle (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1–6.Google Scholar
Tavory, I. and Timmermans, S. (2014) Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (2004) Modern Social Imaginaries, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Constitution of Finland 731/1999, https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1999/en19990731 (accessed 23 April 2024).Google Scholar
Tilastokeskus/Statistics Finland (2023) ‘Vieraskielisten määrä kasvoi lähes 38 000 henkilöllä’, Tiedote 31.3.2023. https://stat.fi/julkaisu/cl8lprraorrr20dut5a0tywm5 (accessed 18 March 2024).Google Scholar
Timmermans, S. and Tavory, I. (2012) ‘Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis’, Sociological Theory, 30, 3, 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertovec, S. (2020) Considering the work of “integration”, MMG Working Paper 2020–04, https://www.mmg.mpg.de/565490/WP_20-04_Vertovec_Integration.pdf (accessed 18 March 2024).Google Scholar
Walkey, C., Brown, P. and Martin, P. (2024) ‘Breaking the impasse: rethinking refugee integration through the equality act 2010 in the United Kingdom’, Social Policy and Society, 23, 3, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westlake, D. and Jones, R. K. (2018) ‘Breaking down language barriers: a practice-near study of social work using interpreters’, British Journal of Social Work, 48, 5, 1388–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuill, C. and Mueller-Hirth, N. (2019) ‘Paperwork, compassion and temporal conflicts in British social work’, Time & Society, 28, 4, 1532–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar