Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-5q6g5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T05:21:10.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to Themed Section – Trust and Distrust in Social Welfare: The Perspective of Users

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2025

Maria Theiss Open the ORCID record for Maria Theiss [Opens in a new window]  and
Dorota Szelewa
Maria Theiss*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Dorota Szelewa
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
*
Corresponding author: Maria Theiss; Email: m.theiss@uw.edu.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This themed section aims to contribute to our understanding of how users’ and citizens’ political (dis)trust comes about in the institutional context of social assistance. The section is focused on how welfare users experience various features of institutions when applying for and receiving social benefits and services, and how such features become relevant in building political (dis)trust. They include institutional fragmentation, users’ notions of distributive justice, the organisation of contact with caseworkers, and national legacies of informal practices in welfare services. All empirical articles are based on individual in-depth interviews with welfare users reflecting on their policy experience and institutional and political trust. The cases under comparison include five European countries – Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Serbia. The volume’s contribution points to research avenues for examining how welfare users’ experiences matter in shaping their welfare and political attitudes.

Keywords

trust in welfarepolitical trustwelfare experiencesocial assistancefrontline work

Information

Type
Introduction
Information
Social Policy and Society , First View , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bahle, T. and Wendt, C. (2021) ‘Social assistance’, in Beland, D., Morgan, K., Obinger, H. and Pierson, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 624–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, M. and Dahl, V. (2020) ‘Mechanisms of trust for different modes of welfare service provision’, Public Management Review, 22, 9, 1284–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betkó, J., Spierings, N. and Gesthuizen, M. (2022) ‘How welfare policies can change trust – a social experiment assessing the impact of social assistance policy on political and social trust’, Basic Income Studies, 17, 2, 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkhagen Turesson, A. (2020) ‘Conceptions, norms, and values in the work of child protective services with families at risk: An analysis of social workers’ diaries’, Clinical Social Work Journal, 48, 369–379.Google Scholar
Brodkin, E.Z. (2011) ‘Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 2, i253–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. and Calnan, M. (2012) ‘Trust as a means of bridging the management of risk and the meeting of need: A case study in mental health service provision’, Social Policy and Administration, 47, 3, 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, H., Carr, N. and Whelan, S. (2011) ‘“Like walking on eggshells”: Service user views and expectations of the child protection system’, Child and Family Social Work, 16, 1, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugge, H. (2021) ‘Welfare conditionality and democratic citizenship in Norway’, Journal of European Social Policy, 31, 2, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, J. and Stoker, L. (2018) ‘Political trust in a cynical age’, Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 1, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossar, J., Acheampong, A., Brandon, M., Boudier, A., Bailey, S., Fritz-Campbell, D., Belderson, P., Snape, J., Biggart, L., Thibou, R., Sharpe, D. and Thrower, B. (2013) ‘“It takes a lot to build trust”: recognition and telling – developing earlier routes to help for children and young people’, Children’s Commissioner, October, 1–143.Google Scholar
Devine, D. and Valgarðsson, V.O. (2024) ‘Stability and change in political trust: Evidence and implications from six panel studies’, European Journal of Political Research, 63, 2, 478–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fersch, B. (2016) ‘Welfare service professionals, migrants, and the question of trust: A Danish case’, Professions and Professionalism, 6, 2(Special Issue), e1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2011) ‘Case study’, in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, (4thedition), London: Sage, 301–316.Google Scholar
Goubin, S. and Kumlin, S. (2022) ‘Political trust and policy demand in changing welfare states: Building normative support and easing reform acceptance?’, European Sociological Review, 38, 4, 590–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, K.S., Amilon, A. and Olsen, L. (2022) ‘Trust and mistrust in public services for people with disabilities: Analysing the gap between the perspectives of caseworkers and disabled people in Denmark’, The British Journal of Social Work, 52, 6, 3288–3306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumlin, S. and Haugsgjerd, A. (2017) ‘The welfare state and political trust: Bringing performance back in’, in Handbook on Political Trust, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvakic, M. and Wærdahl, R. (2024) ‘Trust and power in the space between visibility and invisibility: Exploring digital and social media practices in Norwegian child welfare services’, European Journal of Social Work, 27, 1, 96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundahl, B., McDonald, C. and Vanderloo, M. (2020) ‘Service users’ perspectives of child welfare services: A systematic review using the practice model as a guide’, Journal of Public Child Welfare, 14, 2, 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, M.Ø. and Stensöta, H.O. (2019) ‘Welfare state regimes and caseworkers’ problem explanation’, Administration & Society, 51, 9, 1425–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rautio, S. (2013) ‘Parents’ experiences of early support’, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27, 4, 927–934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, R. and Cook, K. (2018) ‘“Don’t even get us started on social workers”: Domestic violence, social work and trust – an anecdote from research’, British Journal of Social Work, 48, 6, 1664–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanfelici, M. (2023) ‘Parents living in poverty and the welfare system: The conditions for trust’, Journal of Family Studies, 29, 5, 2090–2105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, S., Theiss, M., Gędek, W. and Zschache, U. (2025) ‘Citizen among institutions. Fragmentation and trust in social assistance’, Social Policy and Society, online first.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senghaas, M., Freier, C. and Kupka, P. (2019) ‘Practices of activation in frontline interactions: Coercion, persuasion, and the role of trust in activation policies in Germany’, Social Policy and Administration, 53, 5, 613–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M., Gallagher, M., Wosu, H., Stewart, J., Cree, V., Hunter, S., Evans, S., Montgomery, C., Holiday, S. and Wilkinson, H. (2012) ‘Engaging with involuntary service users in social work: Findings from a knowledge exchange project’, British Journal of Social Work, 42, 8, 1460–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stensöta, H.O. and Bendz, A. (2020) ‘Public response to welfare policy retrenchment: The importance of trust in implementing agencies – the case of early retirement in Sweden 1999–2010’, Social Policy and Administration, 54, 1, 102–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tembo, M.J., Studsrød, I. and Young, S. (2021) ‘Governing the family: Immigrant parents’ perceptions of the controlling power of the Norwegian welfare system’, European Journal of Social Work, 24, 3, 492–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theiss, M. and Szelewa, D. (2025) ‘Institutional sources of citizens’ trust in the welfare state: A literature review’, Social Policy and Society, 1–15.Google Scholar
Van Ryzin, G.G. (2011) ‘Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 4, 745–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasiljević, J., Fiket, I., Đorđević, A. and Štěpánková, L. (2025) ‘The role of bureaucratic procedures and “caring professionals” in fostering user trust: Evidence from Serbia and the Czech Republic’, Social Policy and Society, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K., Ruch, G. (2008) Social Work: An Introduction to Contemporary Practice, Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wilson, S., Hean, S., Abebe, T. and Heaslip, V. (2020) ‘Children’s experiences with child protection services: A synthesis of qualitative evidence’, Children and Youth Services Review, 113, 104974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanow, D. (2000) Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Chen, W., Petrovsky, N. and Walker, R.M. (2022) ‘The expectancy–disconfirmation model and citizen satisfaction with public services: A meta-analysis and an agenda for best practice’, Public Administration Review, 82, 1, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zschache, U., Schneider, S., Brus, A. and Trenz, H.J. (2025) ‘The conditionality of trusting caseworkers in the social services sector – insights from Germany and Denmark’, Social Policy and Society, 1–15.Google Scholar