Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T00:36:23.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed germination of ethylene perception mutants of tomato and Arabidopsis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

Gunching Siriwitayawan ,
Robert L. Geneve  and
A. Bruce Downie
Gunching Siriwitayawan
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA
Robert L. Geneve
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA
A. Bruce Downie*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA
*
*Correspondence Fax: +1 859 257 2859 Email: adownie@uky.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The involvement of ethylene in determining the time to radicle protrusion was investigated in ethylene-insensitive gain-of-function (GOF) receptor mutants in tomato and Arabidopsis, as well as in single and double loss-of-function (LOF) receptor mutants in Arabidopsis. Because ethylene evolution from seeds is coincident with radicle protrusion, and the ability to convert 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) to ethylene is diagnostic for seed vigour, it was hypothesized that ethylene-insensitive mutants would require more time to complete germination compared to wild-type seeds. Mutant Never Ripe (Nr) tomato seeds from two genetic backgrounds refuted this hypothesis, while experiments with wild-type seeds, treated with the ethylene action inhibitors, 2,5-norbornadiene or silver thiosulphate, supported it. However, reciprocal crosses between wild-type and Nr demonstrated that ethylene insensitivity during seed development determined subsequent time to complete germination, rather than the ability of the embryo/endosperm to perceive ethylene in the mature seed during germination. Additionally, seed quality, determined by standard vigour tests, was reduced in Nr compared to wild-type seeds, establishing a disconnection between rapid completion of germination and seed vigour. In Arabidopsis, all ethylene-insensitive GOF, and five of six single LOF mutants, required more time to complete 50% radicle protrusion, while double LOF mutants required the same, or less, time to complete germination compared to wild-type seeds. These findings support a role for ethylene perception in determining the length of time Arabidopsis seeds remain in the lag phase prior to radicle protrusion.

Keywords

Arabidopsisethyleneetr1etr2germinationLycopersiconNever Ripeseed vigour

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 303 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abeles, F.B. (1986) Role of ethylene in Lactuca sativa cv Grand Rapids seed germination. Plant Physiology 81, 780–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Seed Analysts. (1983) Seed vigor testing handbook, No. 32. Las Cruces, NM, Association of Official Seed Analysts.Google Scholar
Association of Official Seed Analysts. (1993) Rules for testing seeds. Journal of Seed Technology 16, 1–113.Google Scholar
Beaudoin, N., Serizet, C., Gosti, F. and Giraudat, J. (2000) Interactions between abscisic acid and ethylene signaling cascades. Plant Cell 12, 1103–1115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleecker, A.B. (1999) Ethylene perception and signaling: an evolutionary perspective. Trends in Plant Science 4, 269–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleecker, A.B. and Kende, H. (2000) Ethylene: A gaseous signal molecule in plants. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 16, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleecker, A.B. and Schaller, G.E. (1996) The mechanism of ethylene perception. Plant Physiology 111, 653–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bleecker, A.B., Estelle, M.A., Somerville, C. and Kende, H. (1988) Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 241, 1086–1089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blume, B. and Grierson, D. (1997) Expression of ACC oxidase promoter–GUS fusions in tomato and Nicotiana plumbaginifolia regulated by developmental and environmental stimuli. Plant Journal 12, 731–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahal, P. and Bradford, K.J. (1990) Effects of priming and endosperm integrity on seed germination rates of tomato genotypes. II: Germination at reduced water potential. Journal of Experimental Botany 41, 1441–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Martinis, D. and Mariani, C. (1999) Silencing gene expression of the ethylene-forming enzyme results in a reversible inhibition of ovule development in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Cell 11, 1061–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Rueda, P.M., Gallardo, M., Matilla, A.J. and Sanchez-Calle, I.M. (1995) Preliminary characterization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase properties from embryonic axes of chick-pea (Cicer arientinum L.) seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 46, 695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecker, J.R. (1995) The ethylene signal transduction pathway in plants. Science 268, 667–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallardo, M., Gallardo, M.E., Matilla, A.J., De Rueda, P.M. and Sánchez-Calle, I.M. (1994) Inhibition of polyamine synthesis by cyclohexylamine stimulates the ethylene pathway and accelerates the germination of Cicer arietinum seeds. Physiologia Plantarum 91, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghassemian, M., Nambara, E., Cutler, S., Kawaide, H., Kamiya, Y. and McCourt, P. (2000) Regulation of abscisic acid signaling by the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12, 1117–1126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorecki, R.J., Ashino, H., Satoh, S. and Esashi, Y. (1991) Ethylene production in pea and cocklebur seeds of differing vigour. Journal of Experimental Botany 42, 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groot, S.P.C. and Karssen, C.M. (1987) Gibberellins regulate seed germination in tomato by endosperm weakening: a study with gibberellin-deficient mutants. Planta 171, 525–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groot, S.P.C. and Karssen, C.M. (1992) Dormancy and germination of abscisic acid-deficient tomato seeds: studies with the sitiens mutant. Plant Physiology 99, 952–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilhorst, H.W.M. and Downie, B. (1996) Primary dormancy in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Moneymaker): studies with the sitiens mutant. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, J. and Meyerowitz, E.M. (1998) Ethylene responses are negatively regulated by a receptor gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 94, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hua, J., Chang, C., Sun, Q. and Meyerowitz, E.M. (1995) Ethylene insensitivity conferred by Arabidopsis ERS gene. Science 269, 1712–1714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, P.R. and Ecker, J.R. (1998) The ethylene gas signal transduction pathway: A molecular perspective. Annual Review of Genetics 32, 227–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, A.A. (1994) ACC-derived ethylene production, a sensitive test for seed vigor. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 119, 1083–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollipara, K.P., Saab, I.N., Wych, R.D., Lauer, M.J. and Singletary, G.W. (2002) Expression profiling of reciprocal maize hybrids divergent for cold germination and desiccation tolerance. Plant Physiology 129, 974–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lalonde, S. and Saini, H.S. (1992) Comparative requirement for endogenous ethylene during seed germination. Annals of Botany 69, 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanahan, M.B., Yen, H., Giovannoni, J.J. and Klee, H.L. (1994) The Never Ripe mutation blocks ethylene perception in tomato. Plant Cell 6, 521–530.Google ScholarPubMed
Lashbrook, C.C., Tieman, D.M. and Klee, H.J. (1998) Differential regulation of the tomato ETR gene family throughout plant development. Plant Journal 15, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leubner-Metzger, G. and Meins, F. (2000) Sense transformation reveals a novel role for class I beta-1,3-glucanase in tobacco seed germination. Plant Journal 23, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leubner-Metzger, G., Petruzzelli, L., Waldvogel, R., Vogeli-Lange, R. and Meins, F. (1998) Ethylene-responsive element binding protein (EREBP) expression and the transcriptional regulation of class I beta-1,3-glucanase during tobacco seed germination. Plant Molecular Biology 38, 785–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizada, M.C.C. and Yang, S.F. (1979) A simple and sensitive assay for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Analytical Biochemistry 100, 140–145.Google ScholarPubMed
Matilla, A.J. (2000) Ethylene in seed formation and germination. Seed Science Research 10, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M.B. (1998) Seed quality assessment. Seed Science Research 8, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, T.A., Hoffman, N.E. and Yang, S.F. (1982) The effects of plant-hormone pretreatments on ethylene production and synthesis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in water-stressed wheat leaves. Planta 155, 437–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ni, B.R. and Bradford, K.J. (1993) Germination and dormancy of abscisic acid and gibberellin-deficient mutant tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seeds. Sensitivity of germination to abscisic acid, gibberellin and water potential. Plant Physiology 101, 607–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peck, S.C., Pawlowski, K. and Kende, H. (1998) Asymmetric responsiveness to ethylene mediates cell elongation in the apical hook of peas. Plant Cell 10, 713–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petruzzelli, L., Coraggio, I., Leubner-Metzger, G. (2000) Ethylene promotes ethylene biosynthesis during pea seed germination by positive feedback regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase. Planta 211, 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, M.S. (1995) Ethylene in plant growth, development, and senescence. pp. 486–508. in Davies, P.J. (Ed.) Plant hormones: Physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rick, C.M. and Butler, L. (1956) Cytogenetics of the tomato. Advances in Genetics 8, 267–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Gacio, M.D. and Matilla, A.J. (2001) The last step of the ethylene biosynthesis pathway in turnip tops ( Brassica rapa ) seeds: alterations related to development and germination and its inhibition during desiccation. Physiologia Plantarum 112, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (1988) SAS/STAT user's guide: Statistics Version 5. Cary, NC, SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Siriwitayawan, G. (2002) The involvement of ethylene in determining seed vigor and the time required for the completion of germination. PhD Thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
Sisler, E.C. and Yang, S.F. (1984) Ethylene, the gaseous plant hormone. BioScience 34, 234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TeKrony, D.M. and Woltz, J.M. (1997) Standardization of the cold test for corn seed. Proceedings of the Corn and Sorghum Research Conference 52, 206–227.Google Scholar
Tieman, D.V., Taylor, M.G., Ciardi, J.A. and Klee, H.J. (2000) The tomato ethylene receptors NR and LeETR4 are negative regulators of ethylene response and exhibit functional compensation within a multigene family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 5663–5668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, K., Scarth, R., Daun, J.K. and Vessey, J.K. (1995) Chlorophyll degradation in summer oilseed rape and summer turnip rape during seed ripening. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 75, 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar