Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-jtjl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-14T09:34:10.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explanation in Biology: Let's Razor Ockham's Razor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Elliott Sober
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When philosophers discuss the topic of explanation, they usually have in mind the following question: given the beliefs one has and some proposition that one wishes to explain, which subset of the beliefs constitutes an explanation of the target proposition? That is, the philosophical ‘problem of explanation’ typically has bracketed the issue of how one obtains the beliefs; they are taken as given. The problem of explanation has been the problem of understanding the relation ‘x explains y’. Since Hempel (1965) did so much to canonize this way of thinking about explanation, it deserves to be called ‘Hempel's problem’.

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 27 , March 1990 , pp. 73 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Carnap, R. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1976. The Selfish Gene (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Edwards, A. and Cavalli-Sforza, L. 1963. ‘The Reconstruction of Evolution’, Ann. Human Genetics, 27, 105.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. and Cavalli-Sforza, L. 1964. ‘Reconstruction of Evolutionary Trees’ in Heywood, V. and McNeill, J. (eds.) Phenetic and Phylogenetic Classification (New York Systematics Association Publications), 6, 67–76.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. 1983. ‘Parsimony in Systematics’, Annual Review of Ecolog and Systematics, 14, 313–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Reprinted New York: Dover, 1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. 1932. The Causes of Evolution (Reprinted New York: Cornell University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Hempel, C. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).Google Scholar
Jaynes, E. 1968. ‘Prior Probabilities’, IEEE Trans. Systems Sci. Cymbernetics, 4, 227–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, H. 1957. Scientific Inference (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Miller, R. 1987. Fact and Method (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery (London: Hutchinson).Google Scholar
Quine, W. 1966. ‘On Simple Theories of a Complex World’, in Ways of Paradox and Other Essays (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
Rosenkrantz, R. 1977. Inference, Method and Decision (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkrantz, R. 1979. ‘Bayesian Theory Appraisal: A Reply to Seidenfield’, Theory and Decision, 11, 441–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Seidenfeld, T. 1979. ‘Why I am not a Bayesian: Reflections Prompted by Rosenkrantz’, Theory and Decision, 11, 413–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. 1975. Simplicity (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. 1981. ‘The Principle of Parsimony’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 32, 145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. 1984. The Nature of Selection (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1987. ‘Explanation and Causation: A Review of Salmon's Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 38, 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. 1988a. ‘Confirmation and Law-Likeness’, Philosophical Review, 97, 617–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. 1988b. ‘The Principle of the Common Cause’, in Fetzer, J. (ed.) Probability and Causation: Essays in Honor of Wesley Salmon. (Dordrecht: Reidel), 211–28.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1988c. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1988d. ‘What is Evolutionary Altruism?’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume, 14, 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. forthcoming. ‘Contrastive Empiricism’, in W. Savage (ed.) Scientific Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, B. 1980. The Scientific Image (Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, M. 1978. ‘A Critical Review of Models of Group Selection’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 53, 101–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1980. The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities (Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings).Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1945. ‘Tempo and Mode in Evolution: a Critical Review’, Ecology, 26, 415–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar