Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-74lm6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-17T13:47:41.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trajectory planning and tracking control for a robotic additive manufacturing system based on binocular vision guidance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2025

Delan Wei
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China
Pengcheng Li*
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China
Jun Xiong
Affiliation:
Hafei Aviation Industry Co., Ltd, Harbin, 150060, China
Yansheng Cao
Affiliation:
Beijing Xinfeng Aerospace Equipment Co., Ltd, Beijing, 100854, China
Xuewen Wei
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China
Wei Tian
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China
Wenhe Liao
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China
*
Corresponding author: Pengcheng Li; Email: lpccmee@nuaa.edu.cn

Abstract

Robotic manufacturing systems offer significant advantages, including increased flexibility and reduced costs. However, challenges in trajectory planning, error compensation, and system integration hinder their broader application in additive manufacturing. To address these issues, this paper proposes a generalized non-parametric trajectory planning method tailored for robotic additive manufacturing. The proposed trajectory planner incorporates chord error and speed continuity constraints and integrates the look-ahead planning with real-time interpolation in a parallel structure to ensure smooth transitions in the robot’s trajectory. Additionally, a real-time path tracking control method is introduced, combining RBF neural network-based dynamic feedforward control with visual servoing-based feedback control. This control strategy significantly improves the robot’s tracking accuracy, particularly for complex additive manufacturing paths that involve multiple short connected line segments and frequent speed variations. The effectiveness of the proposed methods is validated through experiments on a robotic additive manufacturing platform. The experimental results (line segment, circular arc segment, and continuous path tracking) show that the robot’s tracking error remains within $\pm$0.15 mm and $\pm 0.05^{\circ }$.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Pham, A. and Ahn, H., “Rigid precision reducers for machining industrial robots,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 22(8), 14691486 (2021). doi: 10.1007/s12541-021-00552-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Haghighi, A. and Yang, Y., “A novel 6-axis hybrid additive-subtractive manufacturing process: Design and case studies,” J. Manuf. Processes 33, 150160 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, G., Ma, G., Xiao, W. and Tian, Y., “Feature-based five-axis path planning method for robotic additive manufacturing,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B-J. Eng. Manuf. 233(5), 095440541775250 (2018). doi: 10.1177/0954405417752508.Google Scholar
Bandari, Y., Ding, J., Bandari, Y. K., Williams, S. W. and Martina, F., “Additive manufacture of large structures: robotic or CNC systems,” In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (University of Texas, Austin, 2015) pp. 1725.Google Scholar
Dai, X., Feng, C., Xu, Z., Huang, W., He, Y. and Shi, J., “Application progress of robot 3D printing technology,” Mach. Des. Manuf. Eng. 49(6), 1722 (2020).Google Scholar
Song, T., Yang, H., Guo, S., Cui, G. and Yan, Z., “Configuration selection for tip-over stability of a modular reconfigurable mobile manipulator under various application situations,” Robotica 41(3), 10661085 (2023). doi: 10.1017/S0263574722001424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poudel, L., Marques, L. G., Williams, R. A., Hyden, Z., Guerra, P., Fowler, O. L., Sha, Z. and Zhou, W., “Toward swarm manufacturing: Architecting a cooperative 3D printing system,” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 114(8), 081004 (2022). doi: 10.1115/1.4053681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Xie, L., Jiang, M., He, K. and Chen, Y., “Kinematic calibration and feedforward control of a heavy-load manipulator using parameters optimization by an ant colony algorithm,” Robotica 42(3), 738756 (2024). doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574723001728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, R., Gao, W., Huang, Q. and Zhang, Y., “An improved minimal error model for the robotic kinematic calibration based on the POE formula,” Robotica 40(5), 16071626 (2022). doi: 10.1017/S0263574721001284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Y., Tang, T., Ye, W. and Zhang, J., “Geometric error modeling and source error identification methodology for a serial-parallel hybrid kinematic machining unit with five-axis,” Robotica 42(2), 121 (2024). doi: 10.1017/S0263574724002054.Google Scholar
Ojer, M., Etxezarreta, A., Kortaberria, G., Ahmed, B., Flores, J., Hernandez, J., Lazkano, E. and Lin, X., “High accuracy hybrid kinematic modeling for serial robotic manipulators,” Robotica 42(9), 32113229 (2024). doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026357472400136X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E., Polte, M. and Blumberg, J., “Enhanced accuracy specification of heavy-duty industrial robots and the influence of secondary encoders,” In: Proceedings of the Machining Innovations Conference for Aerospace Industry (MIC) (SSRN, 2022). doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4259370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Tian, W., Li, B. and Zhang, N., “Accuracy control method and experiment of robot milling system,” Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 43(5), 11 (2022). doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25815.Google Scholar
Maghami, A. and Khoshdarregi, M., “Vision-based target localization and online error correction for high-precision robotic drilling,” Robotica 42(9), 30193043 (2024). doi: 10.1017/S0263574724001255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B., Li, Y., Tian, W. and Liao, W., “Pose accuracy improvement in robotic machining by visually-guided method and experimental investigation,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 164, 104416 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2023.104416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y., Lin, Y., Xi, F., Guo, S. and Ouyang, P., “Switch-based sliding mode control for position-based visual servoing of robotic riveting system,” J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 139(4), 041010 (2017). doi: 10.1115/1.4034681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, T., Gharaaty, S., Xie, W., Joubair, A. and Bonev, I. A., “Dynamic path tracking of industrial robots with high accuracy using photogrammetry sensor,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 23(3), 11591170 (2018). doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2018.2821600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, R., Cui, X., Lin, J. and Zheng, Y., “An attitude measurement method of industrial robots based on the inertial technology,” Robotica 40(8), 29092931 (2020). doi: 10.1017/S0263574721002010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, X., Zhu, P., Li, X., Zheng, X., Zhou, J., Wang, X. and Wai Samuel Au, K., “A minimal set of parameters-based depth-dependent distortion model and its calibration method for stereo vision systems,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 73, 111 (2024). doi: 10.1109/TIM.2024.3406802.Google Scholar
Jiang, T., Deng, W., Yin, L., Yang, K., Wang, Y. and Zhou, H., “Calibration and pose measurement of a combined vision sensor system for industrial robot grasping of brackets,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 35(8), 085903 (2024). doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/ad3a07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J. and Ma, Y., “Path planning strategies to optimize accuracy, quality, build time and material use in additive manufacturing: A review,” Micromachines-BASEL 11(7), 633 (2020). doi: 10.3390/mi11070633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, H., Zhu, L. and Ding, H., “A real-time look-ahead interpolation methodology with curvature-continuous B-spline transition scheme for CNC machining of short line segments,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 65, 8898 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Z., Fang, H., Bao, Y., Yang, F. and Zhang, J., “Smooth toolpath interpolation for a 5-axis hybrid machine tool,” Robotica 40(12), 44314454 (2022). doi: 10.1017/S026357472200100X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S., Liu, X., Yan, B., Bi, J. and Han, X., “A real-time look-ahead trajectory planning methodology for multi small line segments path,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng-en 36(59), 113 (2023). doi: 10.1186/s10033-023-00881-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comminal, R., Serdeczny, M., Pedersen, D. and Spangenberg, J., “Motion planning and numerical simulation of material deposition at corners in extrusion additive manufacturing,” Addit. Manuf. 29, 100753 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.06.005.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Zhao, T., Li, L., Liu, W., Wang, T. and Yue, J., “A path planning and sharp corner correction strategy for wire and arc additive manufacturing of solid components with polygonal cross-sections,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 106(11), 48794889 (2020). doi: 10.1007/s00170-020-04960-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zapata, A., Bendo, A., Spreitler, M., Zhao, X., Bernauer, C., Yoshioka, H. F. and Zaeh, M., “A model-based approach to reduce kinematics-related overfill in robot-guided laser directed energy deposition,” CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 45, 200209 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.06.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, D., He, Y., Yu, X. and Li, F., “Trajectory smoothing planning of delta parallel robot combining cartesian and joint space,” Mathematics 11(21), 4509 (2023). doi: 10.3390/math11214509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, D., Li, P., Tian, W., Wei, X., Bai, Q., Zhang, L., Li, C. and Hou, Y., “Manipulators 3d printing trajectory tracking control combined with rbfnns and visual feedback,” In: 2022 37th Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC) (IEEE, Beijing, China, 2022) pp. 773778. doi: 10.1109/YAC57282.2022.10023700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, W., Mei, D., Li, P., Zeng, Y., Hong, P. and Zhou, W., “Determination of optimal samples for robot calibration based on error similarity,” Chinese J. Aeronaut. 28(3), 946953 (2015).10.1016/j.cja.2015.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar