Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T23:55:42.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Automation and Maintenance Training*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Peter Senker
Peter Senker
Affiliation:
Senior Fellow, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Mantell Building, Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9RF (U.K.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

SUMMARY

The effective use of robots, FMS systems and other complex modern production equipment demands the deployment of multi-skilled maintenance people. Although this need has been well known for several years, several factors conspire to prevent sufficient appropriate maintenance training schemes being established. Such factors include demarcation problems, deficiencies in management industrial relations competence, and excessive reliance on ‘poaching’ trained people rather than on training. Reasons are adduced why reliance on equipment suppliers for maintenance is likely to prove insufficient.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 47 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Swords-Isherwood, N. and Senker, P., Microelectronics and the Engineering Industry: The Need for Skills (Pinter, London, 1980) p. 173.Google Scholar
2.Senker, P., Swords-Isherwood, N., Brady, T. and Huggett, C., Maintenance skills in the engineering industry: the influence of technological change (Engineering Industry Training Board Occasional Paper 8, 1981).Google Scholar
3.Basey, R.W., “Training for new technology–robots and control systems operation and maintenance” Proceedings of the 6th British Robot Association Conference (16–1905, 1983).Google Scholar
4.Fleck, J., “The employment effects of robots” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Human Factors in Manufacturing (3–504 1984).Google Scholar
5.Computerized Manufacturing Automation: Employment, Education and the Workplace Washington D.C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, OTA-CIT-235, pp. 111–112 and 196 (04, 1984).Google Scholar
6.Blumberg, M. and Gerwin, D., “Coping with advanced manufacturing technology” International Institute of Management Labour Market Policy Discussion Paper (Berlin, 1981).Google Scholar
7.Lee, J.W. and Lancaster, J.W., “The Maintenance Training Gap” Training and Development Journal 46–49 (11 1971).Google Scholar
8.Bell, R.M., Changing Technology and Manpower Requirements in the Engineering Industry Sussex University Press in association with the Engineering Industry Training Board, Research Report No. 3 (1972).Google Scholar
9.Astrop, A.W., “Plant maintenance and the hybrid engineer” Machinery and Production Engineering 74–76 (26 01 1977).Google Scholar
10.EETPU, Electronics Training for the Future Today, Towards 2000 (01, 1984).Google Scholar
11.Bradshaw, D., “A survival course” Electronics Weekly (17 10, 1984).Google Scholar
12.Brady, T. and Senker, P., “Contract Maintenance: No Panacea for Skills Shortages” A report prepared for the Manpower Services Commission, mimeo, Science Policy Research Unit (09, 1984).Google Scholar