Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-65mhm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-08T19:31:05.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMPLIANCE AND COMMAND II, IMPERATIVES AND DEONTICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2018

KIT FINE
KIT FINE*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, New York University
*
*PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT NEW YORK UNIVERSITY NEW YORK, NY 10003, USA E-mail:kf14@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I extend the previously given truth-maker semantics and logic for imperatives to deontic statements.

Keywords

03B45deontic logicobligationpermissionpossible worlds semanticstruthmaker semanticsimperative logicfree choice permissionup-dating

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Symbolic Logic , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 634 - 664
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aloni, M. (2007). Free choice, modals, and imperatives. Natural Language Semantics, 15, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aloni, M. D. & Ciardelli, I. A. (2013). A logical account of free choice imperatives. In Aloni, M. D. and Franke, M., editors. The Dynamic, Inquisitive, and Visionary Life of φ, ?φ, and ◇φ – A Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman. Available at: http://festschriften.illc.uva.nl/Festschrift-JMF/.Google Scholar
Alonso-Ovalle, L. (2005). Disjunction in a Modal Space. Handout of a paper presented at NYU Polarity Workshop.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. R. (1966). The formal analysis of normative systems. In Rescher, N., editor. The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 147–214.Google Scholar
Anglberger, A. J. J., Korbmacher, F. L. G., & Faroldi, J. (2016). An exact truthmaker semantics for explicit permission and obligation. In Roy, O., Tamminga, A., and Willer, M., editors. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. 13th International Conference, DEON 2016. London: College Publications, pp. 16–31.Google Scholar
Asher, N. & Bonevac, D. (2005). Free choice permission is strong permission. Synthese, 145, 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcan-Marcus, R. (1980). Moral dilemmas and consistency. Journal of Philosophy, 77 (3), 121–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, C. (2010). Free choice permission as resource sensitive reasoning. Semantics and Pragmatics, 3, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. (2014). Permission and possible worlds. Dialectica, 68.3, 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. (2016). Angellic content. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 45, 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. (2007). Free choice disjunction and the theory of scalar implicatures. In Sauerland, U. and Stateva, P., editors. Compositional Semantics. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, pp. 71–120Google Scholar
Kamp, H. (1973). Free choice permission. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 74, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanger, S. (1971). New foundations for ethical theory. In Hilpinen, R., editor. Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing, pp. 36–58.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, M. S. (2012). Interpreting Imperatives. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1977). What “must” and “can” must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, A. & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: The view from japanese. In Otsu, Y., editor. Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1979). A problem about permission. In Saarinen, E., Niiniluoto, I., Hilpenin, R., and Provence, M., editors. Essays in Honor of Jaakko Hintikka. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 163–75. Reprinted in Lewis (2000), pp. 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (2000). Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, H. E. (editor) (1996). Moral Dilemmas and Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mastop, R. (2005). What Can You Do: Imperative Mood in Semantic Theory . Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Nute, D. (1985). Permission. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 16, 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portner, P. (2004). The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In Watanabe, K. and Young, R. B., editors. Proceedings of SALT 14. New York: CLC Publications, pp. 235–252.Google Scholar
Portner, P. (2007). Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics, 15(4) (Winter 2007), 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portner, P. (2012). Permission and choice. In Grewendorf, G. and Zimmermann, T. E., editors. Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories. Studies in Generative Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 43–68.Google Scholar
van Rooij, R. (2000). Permission to change. Journal of Semantics, 17(2), 119–143.Google Scholar
Segerberg, K. (1990). Validity and satisfaction in imperative logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 31(2), 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraassen, van (1973). Values and the heart’s command. Journal of Philosophy, 70.1, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and Action. London: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
Yablo, S. (2011). A problem about permission and possibility. In Egan, A. and Weatherstone, B., editors. Epistemic Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 270–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar