Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-smtgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T14:41:48.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Phillips

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2003

BRIAN R. CLACK
BRIAN R. CLACK
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, St Clare's, Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7AL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this response to D. Z. Phillips's critique of my interpretation of Wittgenstein's view of magic and ritual, I counter Phillips's claim that I have misrepresented the Wittgensteinian view of ritual, consider the instrumentalist dimension of the Remarks on Frazer's Golden Bough, offer some objections to Phillips's expressivist view that a ritual ‘says itself’, and detect obscurantism in his approach to the study of religion.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 203 - 209
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable