Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T19:42:14.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kenoticism and essential divine properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2019

ERIC YANG
ERIC YANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA 95053, USA
*
e-mail: etyang@scu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Traditional Christology maintains that Christ was a single divine person with two natures (human and divine). According to kenotic Christology, certain divine properties such as omniscience and omnipotence were divested in order for Christ to acquire essential human properties. However, such a view appears to conflict with perfect-being theology, which takes omniscience and omnipotence to be essential properties for being divine. I propose a view that adopts a Thomistic theory of essences in order to show that there need be no conflict, and hence Christ can give up the property of being omniscient while still being essentially omniscient.

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 409 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Archer, Joel (2018) ‘Kenosis, omniscience, and the Anselmian concept of divinity’, Religious Studies, 54, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey (2014) Aquinas's Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Stephen T. (2003) ‘The ontological argument’, in Copan, Paul & Moser, Paul K. (eds) The Rationality of Theism (London: Routledge), 93–111.Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen T. (2006) ‘Is kenosis orthodox?’, in Evans, C. Stephen (ed.) Exploring Kenotic Christology (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 112–138.Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen T. (2011) ‘The metaphysics of kenosis’, in Marmodoro, Anna & Hill, Jonathan (eds) The Metaphysics of Incarnation (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Stephen T. (2017) ‘Divine incomprehensibility: can we know the unknowable God?’, Topoi, 36, 565–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. Stephen (2002) ‘The self-emptying of love: some thoughts on kenotic Christology’, in Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel, & O'Collins, Gerald (eds) The Incarnation (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 246–272.Google Scholar
Fine, Kit (1994) ‘Essence and modality’, Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hick, John (1988) ‘Critiques’, in Davis, Stephen T. (ed.) Encountering Jesus (Atlanta: John Knox Press), 59–68.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jonathan (2010) ‘A powers theory of modality: or, how I learned to stop worrying and reject possible worlds’, Philosophical Studies, 151, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Jonathan (2015) ‘The ineffable, inconceivable, and incomprehensible God: fundamentality and apophatic theology’, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, 6, 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Thomas V. (1986) The Logic of God Incarnate (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen & Anjum, Rani Lill (2011) Getting Causes from Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawl, Tim (2016) In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin (1999) ‘On heresy, mind, and truth’, Faith and Philosophy, 16, 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senor, Thomas (2011) ‘Drawing on many traditions: an ecumenical kenotic Christology’, in Marmodoro, Anna & Hill, Jonathan (eds) The Metaphysics of Incarnation (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 88–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore (2003) Aquinas (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (1997) The Evolution of the Soul (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (2013) Mind, Brain, and Free Will (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar