Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-k7rjm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T06:44:03.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UCLA Radiocarbon Dates III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

G. J. Fergusson  and
W. F. Libby
G. J. Fergusson
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, University of California, Los Angeles 24, California
W. F. Libby
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, University of California, Los Angeles 24, California
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The measurements reported in this list have been made in the Isotope Laboratory of the Institute of Geophysics during 1963 and are a continuation of the work reported previously (UCLA I and UCLA II). The same counting procedure—CO2 proportional counting at 1 atm pressure in a 7.5 L counter with three energy channels—continues in use. No barometric effect on the background has been observed, presumably because of the combination of fairly constant barometric pressure in this area and the location of the equipment on the ground floor of a five storey building. Dates continue to be calculated on the basis of a C14 half life of 5568 yr according to the decision of the 1962 Cambridge Conference (Godwin, 1962). The modern standard has been taken as 95% of NBS oxalic acid for all organic samples, while for carbonate material such as shells and tufa, dates have been computed on the basis of estimates of the corresponding contemporary C14 activity (Broecker and Walton, 1959) as indicated in the description accompanying the results.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 6 , 1964 , pp. 318 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Date lists: Google Scholar
Chicago II Libby, , 1951.Google Scholar
Chicago III Libby, , 1952.Google Scholar
Chicago V Libby, , 1954.Google Scholar
La Jolla II Hubbs, Bien and Suess, , 1962.Google Scholar
Lamont IV Broecker, and Kulp, , 1957.Google Scholar
Lamont VII Olson, and Broecker, , 1961.Google Scholar
Michigan III Crane, and Griffin, , 1958.Google Scholar
UCLA I Fergusson, and Libby, , 1962.Google Scholar
UCLA II Fergusson, and Libby, , 1963.Google Scholar
Yale IV Deevey, Gralenski and Hoffren, , 1959.Google Scholar
Beyer, H. O., 1947, Outline review of Philippine archaeology by islands and provinces: Philippine Jour. Sci., v. 77, nos. 3-4, July-August.Google Scholar
Broecker, W. S., and Kulp, J. L., 1957, Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements IV: Science, v. 126, p. 1324–1334.Google Scholar
Broecker, W. S., and Walton, A., 1959, The geochemistry of C14 in fresh water systems: Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 16, p. 15.Google Scholar
Cheney, Ralph and Mason, Herbert L., 1934, A Pleistocene flora from the asphalt deposits at Carpinteria, Calif., Carnegie Inst. Washington Pub. no. 415-II, p. 45–79.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B., 1958, University of Michigan radiocarbon dates III: Science, v. 128, p. 1117–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, J. T., 1960, The archaeology of the Fernandez site, a San Francisco Bay Region shellmound: Univ. of Calif. Archaeol. Survey, report no. 49, paper no. 75, p. 11–52.Google Scholar
Deevey, E. S., Gralenski, L. J., and Hoffren, V., 1959, Yale natural radiocarbon measurements IV: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 1, p. 144–172.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. J., and Libby, W. F., 1962, UCLA radiocarbon dates I: Radiocarbon, v. 4, p. 109–114.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. J., and Libby, W. F. 1963, UCLA radiocarbon dates II: Radiocarbon, v. 5, p. 1–22.Google Scholar
Fox, R. B., 1963, Progress report, ancient man in Palawan: Natl. Mus., Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
Godwin, H., 1962, Half-life of radiocarbon: Nature, v. 195, p. 984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafsten, Ulf, 1960, Pleistocene development of vegetation and climate in Tristan da Cunha and Gough Island: Arb. f. Univ. Bergen, Mat.-Naturv. ser., v. 20, p. 1–48.Google Scholar
Harrington, M. R., and Simpson, R. D., 1961, Tule Springs, Nevada, with other evidences of Pleistocene may in North America: Southwest Mus. Papers, no. 18, 146 p., charts, maps.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F., 1951, Preliminary report on the Leonard Rockshelter site, Pershing County, Nevada: Am. Antiquity, v. 17, p. 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heizer, R. F. 1958, Radiocarbon dates from California of archaeological interest: Univ. of Calif. Archaeol. Survey, report no. 44, p. 1–16.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. P., and Bennyhoff, J. A., 1958, Archaeological investigation of Cuicuilco, Valley of Mexico, 1957: Science, v. 127, p. 232–233.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. P., and Bennyhoff, J. A. 1961, The archaeology of two sites at Eastgate, Churchill County, Nevada: I, Wagon Jack Shelter: Univ. of Calif. Anthropol. Records, v. 20, no. 4, p. 119–138.Google Scholar
Hewett, C. A., 1961, Timber-building in Essex: Trans. Ancient Monuments Soc., v. 9, new series, p. 33–56.Google Scholar
Hubbs, C. L., Bien, G. S., and Suess, H. E., 1962, La Jolla natural radiocarbon measurements II: Radiocarbon, v. 4, p. 204–238.Google Scholar
King, C. D., 1962, Excavations at Parker Mesa (LAn-215) : Annual report for 1961-62, Archaeol. Survey, UCLA, p. 91–155.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F., 1951, Radiocarbon dates II: Science, v. 114, p. 291–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libby, W. F. 1952, Chicago radiocarbon dates III: Science, v. 116, p. 673–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libby, W. F. 1954, Chicago radiocarbon dates V: Science, v. 120, p. 739.Google Scholar
Olson, E. A., and Broecker, W. S., 1961, Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements VII: Radiocarbon, v. 3, p. 141–175.Google Scholar
Treganza, and Bierman, , 1958, The Topanga culture: final report on excavations, 1948: Univ. of Calif. Anthropol. Records, v. 12, no. 2.Google Scholar
Wells, P. V., and Jorgensen, C. D., 1964, Pleistocene wood rat middens and climatic change in Mohave Desert: a record of juniper woodlands: Science, v. 143, p. 1171–1173.Google Scholar