No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 June 2021
1 Reference standard for early samples was 19th-century wood, not significantly different (ref. 22, p. 86) from 0.95 x NBS oxalic acid.
2 Listed originally as “possibly older”.
3 Ratio, activity of sample to activity of wood standard.
4 Less than 2% of modern activity.
5 4.2% of modern activity.
6 Sample published twice with different titles.
7 Published, by typographic error, as W-1135.
8 Also published in ref. 178, p. 390.