Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-6tpvb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-13T22:54:57.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent and Planned Developments of the Program OxCal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Christopher Bronk Ramsey  and
Sharen Lee
Christopher Bronk Ramsey*
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom
Sharen Lee
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom
*
1Corresponding author. Email: christopher.ramsey@rlaha.ox.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OxCal is a widely used software package for the calibration of radiocarbon dates and the statistical analysis of 14C and other chronological information. The program aims to make statistical methods easily available to researchers and students working in a range of different disciplines. This paper will look at the recent and planned developments of the package. The recent additions to the statistical methods are primarily aimed at providing more robust models, in particular through model averaging for deposition models and through different multiphase models. The paper will look at how these new models have been implemented and explore the implications for researchers who might benefit from their use. In addition, a new approach to the evaluation of marine reservoir offsets will be presented. As the quantity and complexity of chronological data increase, it is also important to have efficient methods for the visualization of such extensive data sets and methods for the presentation of spatial and geographical data embedded within planned future versions of OxCal will also be discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 55 , Issue 2: Proceedings of the 21st International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 1 of 2) , 2013 , pp. 720 - 730
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1998. Probability and dating. Radiocarbon 40(1):461–74.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2008. Deposition models for chronological records. Quaternary Science Reviews 27(1–2): 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009a. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009b. Dealing with outliers and offsets in radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 51(3): 1023–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Dee, MW, Rowland, JM, Higham, TFG, Harris, SA, Brock, FA, Quiles, A, Wild, EM, Marcus, ES, Shortland, AJ. 2010. Radiocarbon-based chronology for Dynastic Egypt. Science 328(5985): 1554–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Bronk Ramsey, C, Staff, RA, Bryant, CL, Brock, F, Kitagawa, H, van der Plicht, J, Schlolaut, G, Marshall, MH, Brauer, A, Lamb, HF, Payne, RL, Tarasov, PE, Haraguchi, T, Gotanda, K, Yonenobu, H, Yokoyama, Y, Tada, R, Nakagawa, T. 2012. A complete terrestrial radiocarbon record for 11.2 to 52.8 kyr B.P. Science 338(6105): 370–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buck, CE, Litton, CD, Smith, AFM. 1992. Calibration of radiocarbon results pertaining to related archaeological events. Journal of Archaeological Science 19(5): 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, T, Jacobi, R, Basell, L, Bronk Ramsey, C, Chiotti, L, Nespoulet, R. 2011. Precision dating of the Palaeolithic: a new radiocarbon chronology for the Abri Pataud (France), a key Aurignacian sequence. Journal of Human Evolution 61(5):549–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsberg, AJ. 2006. Flexible Bayesian methods for archaeological dating , heffield: University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Lee, S. 2012. Bayesian methods for the construction of robust chronologies , xford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Lee, S, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2012. Development and application of the trapezoidal model for archaeological chronologies. Radiocarbon 54(1): 107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Hardiman, M. 2013a. Modeling the age of the Cape Riva (Y-2) tephra. Radiocarbon, these proceedings, doi:10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Mazar, A. 2013b. Iron Age chronology in Israel—results from modeling with a trapezoidal Bayesian framework. Radiocarbon, these proceedings, doi:10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar