Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T01:11:11.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Study on the Origin of Cremated Bone Apatite Carbon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

C M Hüls ,
H Erlenkeuser ,
M-J Nadeau ,
P M Grootes  and
N Andersen
C M Hüls*
Affiliation:
Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Isotope Research, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
H Erlenkeuser
Affiliation:
Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Isotope Research, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
M-J Nadeau
Affiliation:
Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Isotope Research, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
P M Grootes
Affiliation:
Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Isotope Research, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
N Andersen
Affiliation:
Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Isotope Research, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany
*
Corresponding author. Email: mhuels@leibniz.uni-kiel.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bones that have undergone burning at high temperatures (i.e. cremation) no longer contain organic carbon. Lanting et al. (2001) proposed that some of the original structural carbonate, formed during bioapatite formation, survives. This view is based on paired radiocarbon dating of cremated bone apatite and contemporary charcoal. However, stable carbon isotope composition of carbonate in cremated bones is consistently light compared to the untreated material and is closer to the δ13C values seen in C3 plant material. This raises the question of the origin of carbonate carbon in cremated bone apatite. That is, does the isotope signal reflect an exchange of carbon with the local cremation atmosphere and thus with carbon from the burning fuel, or is it caused by isotopic fractionation during cremation?

To study the changes in carbon isotopes (14C, 13C) of bone apatite during burning up to 800 °, a modern bovine bone was exposed to a continuous flow of an artificial atmosphere (basically a high-purity O2/N2 gas mix) under defined conditions (temperature, gas composition). To simulate the influence of the fuel carbon available under real cremation conditions, fossil CO2 was added at different concentrations. To yield cremated bone apatite properties similar to archaeological cremated bones, in terms of crystallographic criteria, water vapor had to be added to the atmosphere in the oven. Infrared vibrational spectra reveal large increases in crystal size and loss of carbonate upon cremation. The isotope results indicate an effective carbon exchange between bone apatite carbonate and CO2 in the combustion gases depending on temperature and CO2 concentration. 14C dates on archaeological cremated bone apatite may thus suffer from an old-wood effect. Paired 13C and 14C values indicate that in addition to this exchange, isotope fractionation between CO2 and carbonate, and admixture of carbon from other sources such as possibly collagen or atmospheric CO2, may play a role in determining the final composition of the apatite carbonate.

Information

Type
Bone Dating and Paleodiet Studies
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 2: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 587 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Berger, R, Horney, AG, Libby, WF. 1964. Radiocarbon dating of bone and shell from their organic components. Science 144(3621):999–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bocherens, H. 2002. Preservation of isotopic signals (13C, 15N) in Pleistocene mammals. In: Katzenberg, A, editor. Biogeochemical Approaches to Paleodietary Analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic. p 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottinga, Y. 1969. Calculated fractionation factors for carbon and hydrogen isotope exchange in the system calcite-carbon dioxide-graphite-methane-hydrogen-water vapor. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 33(1):49–64.Google Scholar
Cazalbou, S, Combes, C, Eichert, D, Rey, C. 2004. Adaptive physico-chemistry of bio-related calcium phosphates. Journal of Materials Chemistry 14:2148–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mulder, G, Van Strydonck, M. 2004. Radiocarbon dates of two urnfields at Velzeke (Zottegem, East Flanders Belgium). In: Higham, T, Bronk Ramsey, C, Owen, C, editors. Radiocarbon and Archaeology. Proceedings of the 4th Symposium 14C an Archaeology, Oxford, 9–14 April 2002. Oxford University School of Archaeology Monograph. p 247–62.Google Scholar
De Mulder, G, Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, Lerclercq, W, Paridaens, N, Warmenbol, E. 2007. Reevaluation of the late Bronze Age and early Iron Age chronology of the western Belgian urnfields based on 14C dating. Radiocarbon 49(2):499–514.Google Scholar
Dowker, SEP, Elliott, JC. 1979. Infrared absorption bands from NCO– and NCN2– in heated carbonate-containing apatites prepared in the presence of NH4+ ions. Calcified Tissue International 29(1):177–8.Google Scholar
Elliott, JC. 2002. Calcium phosphate biominerals. In: Kohn, MJ, Rakovan, J, Hughes, JM, editors. Phosphates: Geochemical, Geobiological, and Material Importance. Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry 48:427–54.Google Scholar
Enzo, S, Bazzoni, M, Mazzarello, V, Piga, G, Bandiera, P, Melis, P. 2007. A study by thermal treatment and X-ray powder diffraction on burnt fragmented bones from tombs II, IV and IX belonging to the hypogeic necropolis of “Sa Figu” near Ittiri, Sassari (Sardinia, Italy). Journal of Archaeological Science 34(10):1731–7.Google Scholar
Habelitz, S, Pascual, L, Duran, A. 2001. Transformation of tricalcium phosphate into apatite by ammonia treatment. Journal of Materials Science 36(17):4131–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanting, AL, Brindley, JN. 2000. An exciting new development: calcined bones can be 14C-dated. The European Archaeologist 13:7–8 Google Scholar
Lanting, JN, Aerts-Bijma, AT, van der Plicht, J. 2001. Dating of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 43(2A):249–54.Google Scholar
Lee-Thorp, J, Sponheimer, M. 2003. Three case studies used to reassess the reliability of fossil bone and enamel isotope signals for paleodietary studies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 22(3):208–26.Google Scholar
LeGeros, RZ, Trautz, OR, Klein, E, LeGeros, JP. 1969. Two types of carbonate substitution in the apatite structure. Experientia 25(1):5–7.Google Scholar
Nadeau, M-J, Schleicher, M, Grootes, PM, Erlenkeuser, H, Gottdang, A, Mous, DJW, Sarnthein, JM, Willkomm, H. 1997. The Leibniz-Labor AMS facility at the Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123(1–4):22–30.Google Scholar
Nadeau, M-J, Grootes, PM, Schleicher, M, Hasselberg, P, Rieck, A, Bitterling, M. 1998. Sample throughput and data quality at the Leibniz-Labor AMS Facility. Radiocarbon 40(2):239–45.Google Scholar
Nadeau, M-J, Grootes, PM, Voelker, A, Bruhn, F, Duhr, A, Oriwall, A. 2001. Carbonate 14C background: Does it have multiple personalities? Radiocarbon 43(2A):169–76.Google Scholar
Naysmith, P, Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Heinemeier, J, van der Plicht, J, Van Strydonck, M, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Freeman, SPHT. 2007. A cremated bone inter-comparison study. Radiocarbon 49(2):403–8.Google Scholar
Olsen, J, Heinemeier, J, Bennike, P, Krause, C, Hornstrup, KM, Thrane, H. 2008. Characterisation and blind testing of radiocarbon dating of cremated bone. Journal of Archaeological Science 35(3):791–800.Google Scholar
Person, A, Bocherens, H, Saliège, J-F, Paris, F, Zeitoun, V, Gérard, M. 1995. Early diagenetic evolution of bone phosphate: an X-ray diffractometry analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 22(2):211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piga, G, Malgosa, A, Thompson, TJU, Enzo, S. 2008. A new calibration of the XRD technique for the study of archaeological burned human remains. Journal of Archaeological Science 35(8):2171–8.Google Scholar
Scheele, N, Hoefs, J. 1992. Carbon isotope fractionation between calcite, graphite and CO2: an experimental study. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 112(1):35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipman, P, Foster, G, Schoeninger, M. 1984. Burnt bones and teeth: an experimental study of color, morphology, crystal structure and shrinkage. Journal of Archaeological Science 11(4):307–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, HCW. 2005. Biominerals. Mineralogical Magazine 69(5):621–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiner, MC, Kuhn, SL, Weiner, S, Bar-Yosef, O. 1995. Differential burning, recrystallization, and fragmentation of archaeological bone. Journal of Archaeological Science 22(2):223–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surovell, TA. 2000. Radiocarbon dating of bone apatite by step heating. Geoarchaeology 15(6):591–608.Google Scholar
Tamers, MA, Pearson, FJ. 1965. Validity of radiocarbon dates on bones. Nature 208(5015):1053–5.Google Scholar
Trueman, CNG, Behrensmeyer, AK, Tuross, N, Weiner, S. 2004. Mineralogical and compositional changes in bones exposed on soil surfaces in Amboseli National Park, Kenya: diagenetic mechanisms and the role of sediment pore fluids. Journal of Archaeological Science 31(6):721–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, Hoefkens, M, De Mulder, G. 2005. 14C-dating of cremated bones, why does it work? Lunula Archaeologia Protohistorica XIII 18:148.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, De Mulder, G. 2010. The origin of the carbon in bone apatite of cremated bones. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):578–86.Google Scholar
Weiner, S, Bar-Yosef, O. 1990. States of preservation of bones from prehistoric sites in the Near East: a survey. Journal of Archaeological Science 17(2):187–96.Google Scholar
Zazzo, A, Saliège, J-F, Person, A, Boucher, H. 2009. Radiocarbon dating of calcined bones: Where does the carbon come from? Radiocarbon 51(2):1–12.Google Scholar