Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T22:24:32.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Peterborough Schools Nutrition Project: a multiple intervention programme to improve school-based eating in secondary schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Linda Parker  and
Ann Fox
Linda Parker*
Affiliation:
Community Nutrition and Dietetic Department, The City Health Clinic, North Peterborough Primary Care Trust, Wellington Street, Peterborough PE1 5DU, UK
Ann Fox
Affiliation:
Community Nutrition and Dietetic Department, The City Health Clinic, North Peterborough Primary Care Trust, Wellington Street, Peterborough PE1 5DU, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email dfee@nwahc-tr.anglox.nhs.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

To evaluate over two years the effectiveness of multiple interventions targeted at lunches in secondary schools with the aim of increasing the consumption of healthier foods by children during the school day.

Design:

Controlled comparison study of two intervention schools targeted with multiple interventions to increase both the availability and the number of pupils consuming healthier foods, and one control school with no interventions but with the same observations over a two-year period.

Setting:

Three secondary schools in Peterborough, England.

Subjects:

Secondary school children in the three schools taking school lunches between 1996 and 1998.

Results:

School Food Groups (SFGs) were set up in both intervention schools. All catering interventions were actioned via the SFGs. Of the food availability targets, only the target to increase the availability of high-fibre bread in both intervention schools was met. The availability of food items at the control school remained stable. The proportion of pupils consuming fruit and vegetables/salad was very low in all schools at baseline. There were positive changes for consumption of fruit and nonfried potato in one intervention school, and for high-fibre bread and non-cream cakes at the other in the short term, but only that for high-fibre bread was close to being sustained at the end of the two years. The dietary consumption target for vegetables/salad was achieved by the final monitoring period in one school.

Conclusion:

Overall there were no significant changes in school-based eating at the end of the study. Some positive changes were made, with some of the dietary targets being achieved at an early stage but not sustained. Ultimately this study has shown how difficult it is to achieve sustained dietary changes in the eating habits of secondary school children, even with considerable input.

Keywords

School mealsSecondary school childrenDietary targetsInterventions

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 4 , Issue 6 , December 2001 , pp. 1221 - 1228
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2001

References

1Department of Health. The Diets of British Schoolchildren. Report on Health and Social Subjects No. 36. London: HMSO, 1989.Google Scholar
2Gregory, J, Lowe, S, Bates, C, Prentice, A, Jackson, L, Smithers, G, et al. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young People aged 4–18 years. Vol. 1. Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.Google Scholar
3Young, I. Healthy eating policies in schools: an evaluation of effects on pupil's knowledge, attitudes and behaviour. Health Educ. J. 1993; 52: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Morrison, M. Researching food consumers in school. Recipes for concern. Educ. Studies 1995; 21(6): 239–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Devine, C, Lang, T, Longfield, J, Maguire, O, Rayner, M. An Investigation into the Nutritional Quality of School Meals in Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland: Northern Ireland Chest Heart and Stroke Association, 1995.Google Scholar
6Roe, L, Hunt, P, Bradshaw, H, Rayner, M. Health Promotion Interventions to Promote Healthy Eating in the General Population: A Review. Health Promotion Effectiveness Reviews No. 6. London: Health Education Authority, 1997.Google Scholar
7Department of Health. The Health of the Nation: A Strategy for Health in England. London: HMSO, 1992.Google Scholar
8The Caroline Walker Trust. Nutritional Guidelines for School Meals. London: The Caroline Walker Trust, 1992.Google Scholar
9Whittaker, RC, Wright, JA, Finch, AJ, Pstay, BM. An environmental intervention to reduce dietary fat in school lunches. Paediatrics 1993; 19(6): 1107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Burghardt, JA, Devaney, BL, Gordon, AR. The School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study: summary and discussion. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995; 61(Suppl.): 252S–57S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Passmore, S. School Nutrition Action Groups Evaluation Report – A Study to Examine the Impact of Establishing School Nutrition Action Groups in Secondary Schools in Birmingham. Birmingham: Birmingham LEA, 1999.Google Scholar
12Hickman, M, Healy, C. The European Network of Health Promoting Schools: development and evaluation in England. Health Educ. J. 1996; 55: 465–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Peach, R, Dehar, M, Casswell, S, Gourley, G. Heartbeat awards in intermediate and secondary schools in New Zealand: outcomes of the first two years. Health Promotion J. Aus. 1996; 6(1): 42–50.Google Scholar