Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-bw5xj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T08:46:52.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire on adolescents’ home food environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2025

Camila Batista Rodrigues*
Affiliation:
Graduate Program in Nutrition, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Emanuele Souza Marques
Affiliation:
Institute of Social Medicine, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Rosangela Alves Pereira
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Applied Nutrition, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: Camila Batista Rodrigues; Email: camilarodrigues.nutri@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To describe the design and psychometric assessment of the Adolescent Home Food Environment Questionnaire (Acronym in Portuguese: QAAD).

Design:

This was a cross-sectional study. Data were collected between August 2021 and January 2022 through self-administered questionnaires via a survey management application accessible by computer or smartphone. The instrument was subjected to analysis by a panel of experts and to a pretest that enabled the adjustment of the language and the reformulation of the questions. The psychometric evaluation included the assessment of test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), internal consistency (composite reliability), structural validity (exploratory structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis) and construct validity (Mann‒Whitney test; P< 0·05). The following food environment aspects were evaluated: family eating practices, food availability and accessibility, cooking equipment availability and parental feeding style. Moreover, the weekly frequency of fruit, bean and added sugar beverage consumption was assessed.

Setting:

A public high school in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Participants:

14-to-19-year-old students (n 34 in the test‒retest reliability study; n 501 in the validation analysis).

Results:

The final version of the QAAD included thirty-two questions allowing the assessment of seven dimensions of the home food environment. The QAAD demonstrated satisfactory reliability (ICC ranging from 0·44 to 0·78), adequate internal consistency (composite reliability > 0·70) and satisfactory structural and construct validity.

Conclusions:

The careful QAAD design provided a valid, reliable and consistent instrument for characterising adolescents’ home food environments, which may provide information for tailoring and targeting healthy eating promotion actions aimed at adolescents.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

The assessment of the food environment, defined as the interface between food systems and diets, has gained increased interest from researchers and health organisations due to its influence on food choice and consumption and, consequently, health outcomes(1Reference Fleming, Hockey and Schmied3).

The diet of Brazilian adolescents is characterised by the consumption of energy-dense foods with excessive fat, sugar and Na contents, especially ultra-processed foods, combined with a reduced intake of fresh foods, such as fruits and vegetables(Reference Maia, Da Silva and Santos4,Reference Pereira, Pereira and Angelis-Pereira5) . Furthermore, Brazilian adolescents often adopt eating habits that are associated with unfavourable health outcomes, such as skipping breakfast(Reference Silva, Candia and Pequeno6Reference Souza, Neves and Gorgulho8) and replacing full meals with low-nutritional-quality snacks(Reference Teixeira, Philippi and Leal9). In Brazil, the most commonly consumed foods by adolescents in the 2017–2018 National Dietary Survey were rice, beans, coffee and bread(10). In addition, 75 % of the adolescents reported having three main meals (breakfast, lunch and dinner), and 88 % reported consuming at least one snack throughout the day(Reference Rodrigues, Monteiro and de Vasconcelos11). Rice and beans, the main staple foods in Brazil, are usually eaten at lunch and dinner, whereas bread and coffee are common breakfast items. Food choices and meal habits are addressed in the Brazilian dietary guidelines, which recommend a diet based on fresh foods beyond encouraging regular consumption of breakfast, lunch and dinner, preferably shared with family or friends, habits that are related to healthier food choices(12).

Although adolescents are gaining autonomy and independence, most of their food consumption occurs at home(Reference Tyrrell, Greenhalgh and Hodgson13,Reference Raza, Fox and Morris14) . Among Brazilian adolescents, 87 % of total energy intake is provided by food eaten at home(10). Thus, the home food environment significantly influences adolescents’ eating habits. The home food environment is conceived as the place for the development, transmission and reproduction of eating habits and preferences. Nevertheless, its measurement is acknowledged as a complex challenge(Reference Espinoza, Egaña and Masferrer15,Reference Glanz, Sallis and Saelens16) , especially considering various dimensions, such as food availability, parents’ eating habits, family food practices(Reference Liu, Chen and Ng17,Reference Watts, Barr and Hannig18) , family structure(Reference Leite, Pompeo and Monteiro19), food security(Reference Adams, Caccavale and Larose20) and food accessibility and convenience(Reference Yang and Kim21). The scales used in the Eating and Activity over Time Project(Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Wall and Perry22) and the questionnaire proposed by Qiu et al. (Reference Qiu, Moore and Wang23) are instruments that assess some dimensions of the home food environment. The former instrument, developed in the USA, addresses fruit and vegetable availability, parental support for healthy eating and family meal habits. The latter, developed in China, assesses parents’ practices regarding children’s eating habits and the availability of chips and sugar-added beverages.

Since the consumption of homemade meals is central to healthy eating promotion(Reference Mills, Brown and Wrieden24), the presence of equipment that facilitates cooking and food storage, as well as food convenience and accessibility in the household(Reference Yang and Kim21), is important in the assessment of the potential of the home food environment for providing healthy eating for adolescents. However, in general, instruments designed to assess adolescents’ food environment do not include these aspects.

Studies exploring adolescents’ perceptions of the home food environment are scarce, especially in Brazil(Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Wall and Perry22,Reference Qiu, Moore and Wang23,Reference Rathi, Riddell and Worsley25,Reference Leme and Philippi26) ; however, according to Caspi et al. (Reference Caspi, Kawachi and Subramanian27), eating behaviours and food accessibility are more appropriately assessed on the basis of individual perceptions. Therefore, a novel and comprehensive approach to evaluating adolescents’ food environments may be important for designing effective actions to promote healthy eating targeted at adolescents.

This study aimed to design and evaluate a multidimensional instrument to assess adolescents’ perceptions of the home food environment. An original questionnaire encompassing various dimensions and including aspects overlooked in existing instruments was designed on the basis of the literature on the subject(Reference Raza, Fox and Morris14,Reference Espinoza, Egaña and Masferrer15,Reference Rosenkranz and Dzewaltowski28,Reference Green and Glanz29) . Furthermore, in assessing the home food environment of Brazilian adolescents, the instruments must capture the particularities of eating habits and practices in Brazil. The proposed tool identifies critical aspects of the home food environment that influence adolescents’ eating habits, guiding initiatives and public policies to encourage family involvement in promoting healthy eating habits among Brazilian adolescents.

Methods

This study was conducted to design and assess the reliability and validity of the Adolescents’ Home Food Environment Questionnaire (acronym in Portuguese: QAAD, standing for ‘Questionário de Avaliação do Ambiente Alimentar Doméstico’). The study design consisted of three stages: first, the questionnaire design; second, the reliability assessment and third, the validity assessment.

The study population comprised students enrolled on two campuses of a public high school in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. As recommended by Terwee et al., the minimum sample size for a satisfactory reliability study is thirty students(Reference Terwee, Mokkink and Knol30). The reliability assessment was conducted on a branch campus where 200 students (99 girls and 101 boys) were eligible. To assess instrument validity, the sample size was estimated considering a minimum of ten respondents per question, which allows for estimating the parameters needed to assess the psychometric properties of the scale(Reference Kline31). As the instrument included forty-eight questions, a sample size of at least 480 students was estimated. The validity assessment was conducted on the main campus, where 1584 students (663 girls and 921 boys) were eligible. In both reliability and validity studies, all 14- to 19-year-old students enrolled in the selected high school campuses were eligible to participate in the study, and invitations were sent using the school’s official communication channels.

Data were collected during the period of social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic, when students carried out their academic duties remotely. The questionnaires were self-administered via a survey management application accessible by computer or smartphone. The links to access the questionnaires were sent by email to all eligible students. The reliability assessment took place in August 2021, and the validity assessment occurred between September 2021 and January 2022.

In the reliability study, students answered the QAAD twice, with a 2-week interval between responses. In the validation study, in addition to the QAAD, the students answered questions on demographic (gender, age, race) and socio-economic characteristics (education of the household head and participation in government assistance programs) and on the frequency of fruit, vegetable and sugar-sweetened beverage intake in the week prior to completing the questionnaire (later categorised as < 5 or ≥ 5 d per week). This categorisation was chosen to ensure coherence with publications on the frequency of consumption of healthy and unhealthy eating markers(Reference Maia, Da Silva and Santos4,7) and facilitate comparisons with epidemiological studies and nutritional surveillance research conducted in Brazil.

Home Food Environment Evaluation Questionnaire

The QAAD design was guided by a literature review conducted in 2021 across several databases (PubMed, SciELO, Google Scholar) and university repositories of theses and dissertations. The review utilised the following keywords: ‘food environment’, ‘home environment’, ‘adolescent’, ‘children’, ‘eating behaviour’, ‘food consumption’, ‘weight status’, ‘overweight’, ‘factors’ and ‘determinants’, along with the corresponding terms in Portuguese. Additionally, publications by government and international organisations focusing on food environments, adolescents’ food choices and childhood obesity were considered.

The literature review identified key dimensions deemed essential for inclusion in QAAD to evaluate the home food environment comprehensively. Furthermore, questionnaires such as those from the ‘Eating and Activity over Time Project – Project EAT’(Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Wall and Perry22), the ‘Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health and Eating – FLASHE study’(Reference Nebling, Hennessy and Oh32) and the ‘Nutrition Environment Measures Survey–Perceived’(Reference Alber, Green and Glanz33) were used as references for the QAAD. The initial questionnaire consisted of forty-eight questions categorised into eight constructs: (a) family eating practices; (b) availability of fresh foods and whole grains; (c) availability of unhealthy foods; (d) availability of equipment for cooking and storing food; (e) accessibility of fruits and vegetables; and (f) motivational, (g) monitoring or controlling and (h) emotional behaviours of parents or guardians regarding adolescents’ food intake.

A panel of experts comprising nutritionists and school health researchers analysed the questionnaire, and a pretest was conducted with eleven adolescents aged 16–19 years who were not part of the study sample. These two steps facilitated language adjustments and enhanced the clarity of the instrument.

In the evaluation of family eating practices, adolescents were asked to rate their agreement with statements about the frequency of family meal practices, such as interactions during meals and the frequency of eating away from home or consuming takeaway meals over the 30 d preceding the questionnaire.

Yes/no questions assessed the availability of fresh foods (leafy vegetables, other vegetables, fruits, meat and beans), whole grains (oatmeal and brown rice), unhealthy foods (cookies, candies, desserts, sodas, sugar-sweetened beverages, processed meat, ready-to-eat meals) and cooking and food storage equipment (refrigerator and freezer, oven, microwave, air fryer, blender, orange squeezer, sandwich maker, pressure cooker).

To determine fruit and vegetable accessibility, adolescents were asked to express their agreement with statements regarding the accessibility of fruits and vegetables at home and the presence of a vegetable garden or fruit trees.

Parents’ or guardians’ motivational behaviours were assessed through questions about their consumption of vegetables, fruits and beans in the presence of the adolescents, as well as their encouragement for adolescents to consume these foods.

Parents’ or guardians’ monitoring or control behaviours were evaluated by inquiring whether they were concerned about adolescents’ eating habits, body weight and intake of fruits, vegetables, snacks, sodas and sugar-sweetened beverages. Adolescents were also asked if they felt pressured to eat meals even when they did not enjoy the food.

Parents’ or guardians’ emotional behaviours were assessed by asking if they offered food or drinks as rewards for good behaviour or to compensate for sadness, annoyance or irritation. Additionally, the adolescents were asked if alternatives were provided when they refused the food offered at a meal.

The QAAD assigns scores to each dimension, with higher scores indicating a home food environment more conducive to promoting healthy eating habits (see online supplementary material, Supplemental Material).

Statistical analysis

The demographic and socio-economic profiles of the adolescents, along with their food consumption frequency, were described in terms of absolute and relative frequencies.

The evaluation of structural validity was conducted in three stages. Stage 1 involved a confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the initial forty-eight-question eight-factor model. The model’s goodness-of-fit was assessed using the root mean square error of approximation < 0·06, the comparative fit index ≥ 0·90 and the Tucker‒Lewis Index ≥ 0·90(Reference Brown34). The modification index and expected parameter changes were examined to identify potential anomalies in the model.

Given the inadequate fit and the anomalies identified in Stage 1, an exploratory approach (Stage 2) was initiated using principal component analysis, retaining factors with eigenvalues > 1·0, which was followed by exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM), employing Geomin rotation(Reference Brown34). The ESEM provides standard errors for all rotated parameters, enables overall model fit testing and examines the relationships between factor structures, contributing to a more robust evaluation of the latent structure. This approach integrates exploratory and confirmatory techniques within the framework of structural equation modelling and represents an advanced alternative to the traditional exploratory factor analysis in evaluating the structural validity of instruments such as the QAAD(Reference Jennrich35,Reference Asparouhov and Muthén36) .

The cross-loadings (high loadings on more than one factor) identified in the ESEM were analysed, and items were excluded based on the following sequential criteria: (1) the two highest factor loadings for a given item exceeded 0·45; (2) the lowest factor loading for a given item exceeded 0·35 and (3) the difference between the two highest loadings for a given item was less than 0·2. These criteria, which are based on the methodological framework outlined in Reichenheim et al. (2022)(Reference Reichenheim, Marques and de Moraes37), ensure that the retained items exhibit strong primary loadings (above the specified cut-off point) and minimal cross-loadings, thereby optimising the clarity and interpretability of the latent structure. After each round of ESEM and the subsequent elimination of items based on the criteria outlined above, a new ESEM iteration was performed until no item met the elimination criteria.

In Stage 3, a new confirmatory factor analysis was performed to validate the revised structure of the instrument, using the same goodness-of-fit criteria described earlier.

The reliability analysis was carried out solely on the final version of the QAAD. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was estimated to assess test‒retest reliability for each questionnaire dimension. The ICC values were categorised on the basis of Landis and Koch’s criteria: ≥ 0·81, almost perfect agreement; 0·61–0·80, substantial agreement; 0·41–0·60, moderate agreement; 0·21–0·40, fair agreement; 0·00–0·20, slight agreement and ≤ 0, poor agreement(Reference Landis and Koch38). Internal consistency was evaluated by estimating the composite reliability, which is considered a more appropriate measure when confirmatory factor analysis is applied, with values > 0·70 deemed satisfactory(Reference Kline31,Reference Raykov39,Reference Hauck-Filho and Valentini40) .

Construct validity was assessed by comparing the median scores for the home food environment dimensions across categories of selected food item consumption frequency (Mann‒Whitney test; P< 0·05). To complement the statistical significance test and assess the effect magnitude, Cohen’s d was estimated, with a significance level of P< 0·05 and a power of 0·80. Effect sizes are classified as small (0·20–0·49), moderate (0·50–0·79) or large (> 0·80)(Reference Cohen41). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19·0, Mplus version 8·7 (for factor analysis) and G * Power version 3.1.9.2, HHU (for Cohen’s d effect size estimation).

Ethical issues

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Clementino Fraga Filho Hospital of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (HUCFF/UFRJ) under protocol 4.505.036. Authorisation from the administration of the participating educational institution was obtained. Informed consent was provided by the students and parental/guardian authorisation was required for the minors. During the test–retest phase, participants were identified by their email addresses to match responses over time. However, in the main phase of the study, all responses were anonymised to ensure that no personally identifiable information was collected.

Results

In total, 501 students (32 % of eligible participants) responded to the QAAD in the validation stage. The sample’s mean age was 17 years (sd = 1·24); 51 % were female, 53 % were white, 51 % lived with both parents, 46 % reported that the mother/stepmother was the household head and 60 % of the household heads had ≤ 12 years of education. In the 12 months preceding the survey, 44 % of the families were assisted by a government assistance program. The consumption of fruits at least 5 days per week was reported by 28 % of the students, while 62 % reported eating beans and 17 % reported drinking sugar-sweetened beverages with the same frequency (Table 1).

Table 1. Characterisation of the students (n 501) participating in the adolescents’ home food environment questionnaire validation study, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021–2022

n = Absolute frequency;

* When father/mother marries again with other partners;

refers to a single father/mother;

grandfather/mother, uncle/ant, friend, alone;

§ sugar-sweetened beverages (iced tea, sugar-sweetened processed fruit drinks, drinks with guarana syrup, other).

In the initial stage of the structural validity analysis, the confirmatory factor analysis resulted in the indices root mean square error of approximation, comparative fit index and Tucker‒Lewis Index, which consistently indicated inadequate adjustment for the initial 48-question model. The factor loadings varied from 0·03 to 0·88, items with high residuals were observed (Table 2), and the Modification Index and the Standardised expected parameter changes exceeded the acceptable values. Cross-loadings across factors were also observed.

Table 2. Factor loadings, residuals and adjustments of the initial model and test–retest and composite reliability of the final model of the adolescents’ home food environment questionnaire. High school students (n 501), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021–2022

RMSEA: root mean square error of approximation (< 0·06); CFI: comparative fit index (≥ 0·90); TLI: Tucker–Lewis Index (≥ 0·90).

λ1: Standardised factor loadings in the initial model; λ2: Standardised factor loadings in the final model; δ i : residuals.

* P< 0·05.

ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient (test–retest reliability): ≥ 0·81, almost perfect; 0·61–0·80, substantial; 0·41–0·60, moderate; 0·21–0·40, fair; 0·00–0·20, slight and ≤ 0, poor agreement.

95 % CI.

§ Composite reliability: > 0·70 deemed satisfactory.

In the subsequent stage, ESEM indicated the need to exclude fifteen items with factor loadings below 0·30 and the convenience of merging the items ‘sodas’ and ‘sugar-sweetened beverages’ into a single question (‘sodas and other sugar-sweetened beverages’). In this case, the responses were combined as follows: the option ‘NO’ was considered if the respondent marked ‘no’ for both questions, and ‘YES’ was considered if the respondent selected ‘yes’ for at least one question. Model goodness-of-fit was considered satisfactory, and factor loadings > 0·30 were estimated for all items retained in the final model (Table 2).

Finally, the analyses yielded a parsimonious model composed of thirty-two items and seven dimensions. The subscale scores estimated for the final thirty-two-item QAAD were as follows: (a) family eating practices (4 questions): 0–16 points; (b) availability of fresh foods and whole grains (5 items): 0–5 points; (c) availability of unhealthy foods (6 items): 0–6 points; (d) cooking equipment availability (6 items): 0–6 points; (e) fruit and vegetable accessibility (3 questions): 0–12 points; (f) parents’ or guardians’ motivational behaviour (3 questions): 0–9 points and (g) parents’ or guardians’ monitoring or controlling behaviours (5 questions): 0–17 points. The scores for the dimensions Family Eating Practices, Fruit and Vegetable Accessibility, Parents’ or Guardians’ Motivational Behavior, and Parents’ or Guardians’ Monitoring or Controlling Behaviors increased as the degree of agreement with the statements or the frequency of certain behaviors increased. One point was awarded for the presence of fresh foods, whole grains or cooking equipment, while the presence of unhealthy foods was scored in reverse order. Therefore, for all dimensions, higher scores indicate a household food environment that more strongly supports adolescents’ healthy eating habits (see online supplementary material, Supplemental Table S1).

The test–retest reliability analysis was conducted with thirty-four students (17 % of the eligible students enrolled in the branch campus). Substantial agreement (ICC ranging from 0·61 to 0·80) was estimated for the following QAAD subscales: ‘family eating practices’ (ICC = 0·78), ‘fresh food and whole grain availability’ (ICC = 0·72), ‘unhealthy food availability’ (ICC = 0·77), ‘cooking equipment availability’ (ICC = 0·72), ‘fruit and vegetable accessibility’ (ICC = 0·73) and ‘parents’ or guardians’ motivational behaviour’ (ICC = 0·71), whereas moderate agreement was observed for the ‘parent’ or guardians’ monitoring or controlling behaviours’ dimension (ICC = 0·44) (P< 0·05 for all estimates). All the dimensions presented satisfactory internal consistency, with composite reliability values exceeding 0·70 (Table 2).

The construct validity of the QAAD was confirmed, as the median scores for the dimensions ‘availability of fresh foods and whole grains’, ‘cooking equipment availability’, ‘fruit and vegetable accessibility’ and ‘parents’ or guardians’ motivational behaviours’ were greater for adolescents consuming fruits ≥ 5 d/week than for those consuming fruits < 5 d/week. Compared with those consuming beans < 5 d/week, adolescents reporting bean consumption ≥ 5 d/week presented higher mean scores for ‘family eating practices,’ ‘fruit and vegetable accessibility,’ ‘parents’ or guardians’ motivational behaviours,’ and ‘parents’ or guardians’ monitoring or controlling behaviours’. Conversely, adolescents who drank sugar-sweetened beverages ≥ 5 d/week had lower mean scores for the unhealthy food availability dimension than those who consumed these beverages less frequently, as higher scores in this dimension indicate a lower availability of unhealthy foods. The Cohen’s d effect sizes ranged from small (> 0·2) to moderate (0·5–0·8); P< 0·05) (Table 3).

Table 3 Score median (and interquartile range) for the adolescents’ home food environment questionnaire dimensions according to the frequency of consumption of fruits, beans and sugar-sweetened beverages. High school students (n 501), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021–2022

IQR: Interquartile range SSB: Sugar-sweetened beverages (iced teas, sugar-sweetened processed fruit drinks, drinks with guarana syrup, other).

* P-value < 0·05 (Mann–Whitney test).

Score for the dimension is reversed: ‘yes’ = 0, ‘no’ = 1.

Higher scores indicate food environments more conducive to healthier choices.

§ The effect size quantifies the magnitude of the difference by indicating the relevance of the effect. Effect sizes were estimated only for items with a statistically significant difference between the categories of food frequency of consumption according to the Mann–Whitney test. The effect sizes are considered small (> 0·2), moderate (0·5–0·8) or large (> 0·8)(Reference Cohen41).

Discussion

The evaluation of the QAAD, a tool designed to characterise adolescents’ home food environments, demonstrated that the instrument presents acceptable psychometric qualities, such as good test‒retest reliability, satisfactory internal consistency, consistent structural validity and adequate construct validity. The final version of the QAAD includes thirty-two questions across seven dimensions, encompassing the availability of healthy and unhealthy food items and cooking equipment and family eating behaviours and practices. The QAAD enables the estimation of scores to evaluate the home food environment’s potential to promote healthy eating among adolescents.

Instruments assessing adolescents’ perceptions of the home food environment are scarce, both internationally and in Brazil. In the United States, Nebling et al. (Reference Nebling, Hennessy and Oh32) developed a questionnaire evaluating the home food environment, the community environment and the consumption of healthy and unhealthy foods. Similar to the present study, the questionnaire underwent expert scrutiny and usability tests, addressing parental norms and attitudes toward healthy eating, family meal habits and household food availability. Another comparable instrument is the Dietary and Lifestyle Questionnaire, developed in India by Rathi et al. (Reference Rathi, Riddell and Worsley25). The authors evaluated adolescents’ perceptions of the home food environment across three dimensions − family food rules and food accessibility and availability at home − including questions about responsibility for meal preparation. Like this study, Rathi et al. reported moderate to almost perfect agreement for all items of the questionnaire. In the EAT project, Neumark et al. assessed the home food environment of American adolescents by addressing parental support for healthy eating, family food practices and fruit and vegetable availability. Similarly, the authors submitted the data to expert examination and assessed the test‒retest reliability, internal consistency and structural validity(Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Wall and Perry22). The QAAD builds upon and expands these instruments by incorporating multiple dimensions while undergoing extensive psychometric validation.

Overall, the test–retest reliability of the QAAD was considered acceptable(Reference Landis and Koch38), although the estimated coefficient for ‘Parents’ or guardians’ Monitoring or Controlling Behaviours’ was lower than that for the other dimensions. Responses to questions in this dimension may involve emotions and perceptions about the adolescent–parent relationship, which could fluctuate over short periods. One limitation of test–retest reliability is the possibility of changes in traits of interest, such as attitudes and moods, between test administrations(Reference Echevarría-Guanilo, Gonçalves and Romanoski42). Thus, the moderate ICC estimated for this subscale likely does not significantly affect the overall reliability of QAAD.

The QAAD demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency across all seven dimensions. Although Cronbach’s alpha is more frequently used to analyse the internal consistency of instruments and scales, this study adopted composite reliability, as it is considered a more appropriate estimator when using confirmatory factor analysis(Reference Kline31). Additionally, according to Rayock (1997), Cronbach’s alpha is sensitive to heterogeneity in item factor loadings, which may compromise reliability estimates(Reference Raykov39).

In addition to establishing structural validity through statistical analysis, the QAAD was also subjected to construct validity evaluation by comparing dimension scores across the categories of consumption frequency of markers of healthy and unhealthy eating. Consistent with findings from other studies, individuals with healthier eating habits reported more favourable home food environments for healthy eating. Effect sizes ranged from small to moderate, aligning with expectations for health-related variables, as a substantial portion of the variance in dependent variables may not be easily explained(Reference Cohen41).

The association of the home food environment with adolescents’ diet has been reported in studies conducted in Korea(Reference Yang and Kim21) and in the United States(Reference Watts, Miller and Larson43). For example, daily fruit consumption was greater among Korean adolescents with positive perceptions of fruit availability (0·71 v. 0·39 servings/day) and accessibility (0·70 v. 0·43 servings/day) at home than among those with negative perceptions(Reference Yang and Kim21). Similarly, among American adolescents, the home availability of sugar-sweetened beverages was directly associated with the intake of these drinks (ß = 0·18, P< 0·001), with 16 % of the variance in beverage consumption explained by the family context(Reference Watts, Miller and Larson43).

In addition to the physical aspects of the home food environment, this study identified associations between parental behaviours and family eating practices and the consumption of protective foods, such as fruits and beans. These findings align with those of Leme et al. (Reference Leme and Philippi26), who reported that parental and caregiver support for healthy eating promotion was directly associated with fruit consumption in adolescent girls (ß = 0·26, P= 0·03).

Limitations

A limitation of this study is the high proportion of nonresponses (68 %). The high nonresponse rate may be attributed to social distancing measures for COVID-19 prevention and control, as the research process was conducted remotely, including the invitation and recruitment of participants. However, the number of participants in the study is comparable to that in similar studies(Reference Watts, Barr and Hannig18,Reference Rathi, Riddell and Worsley25,Reference Carducci, Oh and Roth44) , and the sample sizes exceeded the minimum required for both test−retest reliability and structural validation analysis.

Nevertheless, selection bias — particularly self-selection bias — cannot be ruled out, as students who responded to the questionnaire may differ from non-respondents in ways relevant to the study’s topics. Significant differences (χ2, P< 0·05) were found in the distribution of sex and age between respondents and all eligible students, the only variables available for the full eligible population. Among study participants, 49 % were male and 21 % were under 16 years old, compared to 58 % and 36 %, respectively, among eligible students. Given the sample’s limited representativeness, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Implications for research and practice

Although adolescents gain greater autonomy in food choice, during this life stage, home meals remain the primary source of food(Reference Tyrrell, Greenhalgh and Hodgson13,Reference Raza, Fox and Morris14,Reference Carducci, Oh and Roth44) . Moreover, parental eating patterns, family food rules and home food availability appear to significantly influence adolescents’ eating behaviour(Reference Beck, Iturralde and Haya-Fisher45). The data obtained with the QAAD may provide valuable insights into these topics. During the COVID-19 pandemic, with remote schooling and social distancing measures, the home food environment became the predominant factor affecting adolescents’ food consumption.

Evaluating the home food environment and its potential impact on adolescents’ nutrition and health requires indicators that can distinguish the exposure gradient. However, instruments designed to evaluate adolescents’ perceptions of their home food environment are scarce(Reference Pinard, Yaroch and Hart46,Reference Gebremariam, Vaqué-Crusellas and Andersen47) . The QAAD addresses this gap by employing robust development procedures, namely, a comprehensive review of the literature, expert perusal and psychometric testing. Furthermore, the QAAD integrates multiple dimensions to assess the potential of the home food environment for promoting healthy eating among adolescents, overcoming the limitations of instruments that focus on specific aspects. Finally, the QAAD benefits from being self-administered and available online, reducing costs and ensuring data quality control(Reference Siva, Nayak and Narayan48,Reference Rendina, Campanozzi and De Filippo49) .

The validated QAAD provides a reliable and consistent tool for assessing adolescents’ home food environments, offering valuable information for tailoring interventions aimed at healthy eating promotion targeting this population group.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025100402

Acknowledgements

We have no acknowledgements.

Authorship

C.B.R. participated in data collection, analysis, interpretation of results and writing. E.S.M. contributed to the result interpretation and text revision. R.A.P. was involved in the analysis and interpretation of data, as well as in the drafting and final revision of the manuscript.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors

Competing interests

There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethics of human subject participation

This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the Ethical Committee of Clementino Fraga Filho Hospital of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (HUCFF/UFRJ). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

References

High Level Panel of Experts (2017) A Report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/a-i7846e.pdf (accessed December 2024).Google Scholar
Turner, C, Kalamatianou, S, Drewnowski, A et al. (2020) Food environment research in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review. Adv Nutr 11, 387397.Google Scholar
Fleming, C, Hockey, K, Schmied, V et al. (2020) Food and Me. How Adolescents Experience Nutrition across the World. A Companion Report to The State of the World’s Children 2019, Sydney. https://www.unicef.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/Food-and-me-adolescents-SOWC2019-companion-report.pdf (accessed December 2024).Google Scholar
Maia, EG, Da Silva, LES, Santos, MAS et al. (2018) Dietary patterns, sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics among Brazilian adolescents. Rev Bras Epidemiol 21, e180009.Google Scholar
Pereira, TDS, Pereira, RC & Angelis-Pereira, MC (2017) Influence of educational interventions on knowledge about food and nutrition of adolescents in a public school. Cien Saude Col 22, 427436.Google Scholar
Silva, FA, Candia, SM, Pequeno, MS et al. (2017) Daily meal frequency and associated variables in children and adolescents J. Pediatr. (Rio J) 93, 7986.Google Scholar
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2016) National School Health Survey: Rio de Janeiro. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv97870.pdf (accessed December 2024).Google Scholar
Souza, MR, Neves, MEA, Gorgulho, BM et al. (2021) Breakfast skipping and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica 55, 107.Google Scholar
Teixeira, AS, Philippi, ST, Leal, GVS et al. (2012) Replacement of meals with snacks among adolescents. Rev Paul Pediatr 30, 330337.Google Scholar
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2020) Household Budget Survey 2017–2018: analysis of individual food consumption in Brazil. Rio de janeiro. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101742.pdf (accessed December 2024).Google Scholar
Rodrigues, PRM, Monteiro, LS, de Vasconcelos, TM et al. (2024) How many meals and snacks do Brazilians eat a day? Findings from the 2017–2018 Brazilian National Dietary Survey. Cad Saude Publica 40, e00009923 Google Scholar
Brazil (2014) Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population.Ministry of Health, Primary Health Care Secretariat, Department of Primary Care. 2 ed. Brasília: Ministry of Health; available at https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_alimentar_populacao_brasileira_2ed.pdf (accessed December 2024).Google Scholar
Tyrrell, RL, Greenhalgh, F, Hodgson, S et al. (2017) Food environments of young people: linking individual behavior to environmental context. J Public Health (Oxf) 39, 95104.Google Scholar
Raza, A, Fox, EL, Morris, SS et al. (2020) Conceptual framework of food systems for children and adolescents. Glob Food Sec 27, 100436.Google Scholar
Espinoza, PG, Egaña, D, Masferrer, D et al. (2017) Proposal for a conceptual model for the study of food environments in Chile. Rev Panam Salud Pública 41, e169.Google Scholar
Glanz, K, Sallis, JF, Saelens, BE et al. (2005) Healthy nutrition environments: concepts and measures. Am J Heal Promot 19, 330333.Google Scholar
Liu, KSN, Chen, JY, Ng, MYC et al. (2021) How does the family influence adolescent eating habits in terms of knowledge, attitudes and practices? A global systematic review of qualitative studies. Nutrients 13, 3717.Google Scholar
Watts, AW, Barr, SI, Hannig, RM et al. (2018) The home food environment and associations with dietary intake among adolescents presenting for a lifestyle modification intervention. BMC Nutr 4, 3.Google Scholar
Leite, JA, Pompeo, EDP, Monteiro, LS et al. (2021) Association between household composition and dietary consumption in adolescents: a systematic review. DEMETRA: Aliment Nutr Saúde 16, e57485.Google Scholar
Adams, EL, Caccavale, LJ, Larose, JG et al. (2022) Home food environment changes and dietary intake during an adolescent behavioral weight loss intervention differ by food security status. Nutrients 14, 976.Google Scholar
Yang, N & Kim, K (2020) Is the perceived fruit accessibility related to fruit intakes and prevalence of overweight in disadvantaged youth: a cross-sectional study. Nutrients 12, 3324.Google Scholar
Neumark-Sztainer, D, Wall, M, Perry, C et al. (2003) Correlates of fruit and vegetable intake among adolescents: findings from Project EAT. Prev Med 37, 198208.Google Scholar
Qiu, N, Moore, JB, Wang, Y et al. (2021) Perceived parental attitudes are indirectly associated with consumption of junk foods and sugar-sweetened beverages among Chinese adolescents through home food environment and autonomous motivation: a path analysis. Nutrients 13, 3403.Google Scholar
Mills, S, Brown, H, Wrieden, W et al. (2017) Frequency of eating home cooked meals and potential benefits for diet and health: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14, 109.Google Scholar
Rathi, N, Riddell, L & Worsley, A (2018) Indian adolescents’ perceptions of the home food environment. BMC Public Health 18, 169.Google Scholar
Leme, ACB & Philippi, ST (2017) Home food availability, parents’/caregivers’ support, and family meals influence on dietary servings of low-income urban adolescent girls from Brazil. Nutrire: Rev Soc Bras Aliment Nutr 42, 30.Google Scholar
Caspi, CE, Kawachi, I, Subramanian, SV et al. (2012) The relationship between diet and perceived and objective access to supermarkets among low-income housing residents. Soc Sci Med 75, 12541262.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, RR & Dzewaltowski, DA (2008) Model of the home food environment pertaining to childhood obesity. Nutr Rev 66, 123140.Google Scholar
Green, SH & Glanz, K (2015) Development of the perceived nutrition environment measures survey. Am J Prev Med 49, 5061.Google Scholar
Terwee, CB, Mokkink, LB, Knol, DL et al. (2012) Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res 21, 651657.Google Scholar
Kline, RB (2016) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nebling, LC, Hennessy, E, Oh, AY et al. (2017) The FLASHE study: survey development, dyadic perspectives, and participant characteristics. Am J Prev Med 52, 839848.Google Scholar
Alber, JM, Green, SH & Glanz, K (2018) Perceived and observed food environments, eating behaviors, and BMI. Am J Prev Med 54, 423429.Google Scholar
Brown, TA (2015) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, 2o edição. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Jennrich, RI (2007) Rotation Methods, Algorithms, and Standard Errors. Factor Analysis at 100: Historical Developments and Future Directions, pp. 315335. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Asparouhov, T & Muthén, B (2009) Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Model 16, 397438.Google Scholar
Reichenheim, ME, Marques, ES & de Moraes, CL (2022) Structural validity of the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI): a reduced version for use on respondents as victims and perpetrators. Child Abuse Negl 127, 105526.Google Scholar
Landis, JR & Koch, GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biom 33, 159174.Google Scholar
Raykov, T (1997) Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Appl Psychol Meas 21, 173184.Google Scholar
Hauck-Filho, N & Valentini, F (2020) Reliability coefficients and violations of essentially tau-equivalent assumptions. Aval Psicol 19, A-B.Google Scholar
Cohen, J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Echevarría-Guanilo, ME, Gonçalves, N & Romanoski, PJ (2019) Psychometric properties of measurement instruments: conceptual basis and evaluation methods- Part II. Texto e Context Enferm 28, e20170311.Google Scholar
Watts, AW, Miller, J, Larson, N et al. (2018) Multicontextual correlates of adolescent sugar-sweetened beverage intake. Eat Behav 30, 4248.Google Scholar
Carducci, B, Oh, C, Roth, DE et al. (2021) Gaps and priorities in assessment of food environments for children and adolescents in low- and middle-income countries. Nat Food 2, 396403.Google Scholar
Beck, AL, Iturralde, EM, Haya-Fisher, J et al. (2019) Barriers and facilitators to healthy eating among low-income Latino adolescents. Appetite 138, 215222.Google Scholar
Pinard, CA, Yaroch, AL, Hart, MH et al. (2012) Measures of the home environment related to childhood obesity: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 15, 97109.Google Scholar
Gebremariam, MK, Vaqué-Crusellas, C, Andersen, LF et al. (2017) Measurement of availability and accessibility of food among youth: a systematic review of methodological studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14, 22.Google Scholar
Siva, M, Nayak, DP & Narayan, KA (2019) Strengths and weakness of online surveys. IOSR J Humanit Soc Sci 24, 3138.Google Scholar
Rendina, D, Campanozzi, A & De Filippo, G (2019) Methodological approach to the assessment of the obesogenic environment in children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 29, 561571.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Characterisation of the students (n 501) participating in the adolescents’ home food environment questionnaire validation study, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021–2022

Figure 1

Table 2. Factor loadings, residuals and adjustments of the initial model and test–retest and composite reliability of the final model of the adolescents’ home food environment questionnaire. High school students (n 501), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021–2022

Figure 2

Table 3 Score median (and interquartile range) for the adolescents’ home food environment questionnaire dimensions according to the frequency of consumption of fruits, beans and sugar-sweetened beverages. High school students (n 501), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021–2022

Supplementary material: File

Rodrigues et al. supplementary material

Rodrigues et al. supplementary material
Download Rodrigues et al. supplementary material(File)
File 108.8 KB