Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-kmmxp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-25T18:33:44.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coexisting forms of malnutrition among under-5 children in Bangladesh: results from 2012 to 13 and 2019 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2025

Md Ridwan Islam
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Md Fuad Al Fidah*
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Md Mushfiqur Rahman
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Tahmeed Ahmed
Affiliation:
Nutrition Research Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh Clinical and Diagnostic Services, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh Office of the Executive Director, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Sharika Nuzhat
Affiliation:
Clinical and Diagnostic Services, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh
*
Corresponding author: Md Fuad Al Fidah; Email: fuad.fidah@icddrb.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Underweight, wasting and stunting are crucial malnutrition indicators responsible for morbidities among children. Data regarding coexisting forms of malnutrition (CFM) are scarce. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of CFM across two survey years among under-5 Bangladeshi children.

Design:

Cross-sectional study.

Setting:

Data were acquired from two rounds of Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS), Bangladesh conducted in 2012–13 and 2019. Subjects: The analysis included 43 946 (2012–13: 20 885; 2019: 23 061) under-5 children.

Results:

Binomial proportion test, slope index of inequality and multinomial logistic regression models were used for analysis. The prevalence of CFM was 27·45 % and 18·56 % in 2012–13 and 2019, respectively. A significant decrease in the prevalence of CFM was seen across the surveys (P-value < 0·001). Children from urban residence ((2012–13:aOR = 0·70, 95 % CI: 0·64, 0·77); (2019:aOR = 0·71, 95 % CI: 0·65, 0·78), higher maternal education ((2012–13:aOR = 0·28, 95 % CI: 0·24, 0·32); (2019:aOR = 0·28, 95 % CI: 0·24, 0·32), larger size at birth ((2012–13:aOR = 0·62, 95 % CI: 0·52, 0·73); (2019:aOR: 0·60, 95 % CI: 0·50, 0·73) and richest wealth quintile ((2012–13:aOR = 0·25, 95 % CI: 0·22, 0·28); (2019:aOR: 0·30, 95 % CI: 0·27, 0·34)) had lower odds of suffering from CFM compared with their counterparts. Children from poorer quintiles were more influenced by CFM than richer quintiles (Coef.:–0·175, 95 % CI: –0·192, –0·157, P-value < 0·001). Higher percentage of CFM was observed among rich families in 2019 compared with 2012–13 (24·50 % and 20·15 %, respectively; P-value < 0·001)

Conclusion:

The findings of this study should help the researchers and policymakers to understand CFM more clearly and plan prospective studies to explore CFM outcomes. Targeted interventional approaches are needed among parents of rural communities to control the burden of CFM.

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Malnutrition is a prevailing and alarming condition that affects millions of under-5 children all over the world, mostly in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC)(Reference Black, Allen and Bhutta1). Every one in five children is at risk of suffering from malnutrition in developing countries like Bangladesh(Reference Black, Allen and Bhutta1). Childhood malnutrition, including undernutrition, is attributable to compromised growth, metabolic and immune dysfunction, higher risk of infection, altered development of brain and cognitive function and various abnormalities(Reference Black, Allen and Bhutta1,Reference Black, Victora and Walker2) . According to the WHO child growth standards, wasting, stunting and underweight are three of the most critical indicators of malnutrition that can affect a child’s health outcomes and general well-being(3). While wasting and underweight condition is considered to be the result of acute malnutrition, stunting represents chronic malnutrition, mainly causing irreversible damage to the child(Reference Soliman, De Sanctis and Alaaraj4,Reference Islam, Nuzhat and Alam5) . A wasted child becomes too thin for one’s height measured by weight-for-height z score, whereas underweight includes children whose weight is low compared with their age(3). Stunting refers to the condition where a child’s height is less in contrast to their age and is measured by height-for-age z score(3).

According to the WHO factsheet, among the five million under-5 children deaths in the world, about 45 % or 2·4 million deaths can be linked to malnutrition, most of which occurred in LMIC(6). The recent ‘Levels and trends in child malnutrition’ report in 2023 by WHO, UNICEF and World Bank states that around 148 million children are still stunted, whereas 45 million under-5 children are suffering from wasting(7). A staggering number of these children are from Southern Asia and mostly are from resource-poor countries(7). The Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2022 reports that the prevalence of stunting is currently 24 %, which declined from 31 % (Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18), but the proportion still contains a large number of children. Relating to this fact, the prevalence of wasting increased to 11 % from 8 %, and the percentage of underweight remained constant to 22 %(8).

The presence of multiple nutritional dysfunctions is referred to as coexisting forms of malnutrition (CFM)(Reference Khaliq, Wraith and Nambiar9). Under-5 children with CFM bear a higher risk of mortality compared with standalone forms of malnutrition(Reference Garenne, Myatt and Khara10). It also becomes challenging and difficult to control when multiple forms of malnutrition coexist in the body, resulting in increased health risks compared with a single form of malnutrition(Reference Biswas, Townsend and Magalhaes11). McDonald et al. published an article in 2013 where they showed that more than half of the malnourished children are suffering from CFM worldwide, and even one unit increase in their anthropometric deficits can increase the risk of death among under-5 children(Reference McDonald, Olofin and Flaxman12). Although children who are suffering from a single form of malnutrition possess a two times higher risk of death compared with non-malnourished children, the risk expands tenfold in children suffering from coexisting forms of undernutrition(Reference McDonald, Olofin and Flaxman12). In Bangladesh, children who are suffering from wasting, stunting and underweight conditions combined have nineteen times higher odds of mortality compared with healthy children(Reference McDonald, Olofin and Flaxman12).

It is evident from previous studies conducted on demographic and health surveys that socio-demographic and socio-economic factors are crucial determinants of child malnutrition(Reference Abdulla, El-Raouf and Rahman13Reference Rahman, Halder and Rahman16). The prevalence of undernutrition can be attributed to multiple factors such as the mother’s age and height, parent’s education, residence, wealth index and other characteristics(Reference Félix-Beltrán, Macinko and Kuhn17,Reference Rahman and Hossain18) . Although an LMIC like Bangladesh is burdened with a major public health concern like childhood malnutrition, results depicting associated factors of CFM among under-5 children are limited. The primary objective of our analysis was to investigate the prevalence across survey years and important factors that are associated with CFM among under-5 children, where CFM was defined as the presence of any two or all three nutritional deficiencies (wasting, stunting and underweight) in under-5 children.

Methods

The data used in the current study were obtained from two separate rounds of the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) conducted in Bangladesh. The two survey rounds were 2012–13 (Survey 01) and 2019 (Survey 02). MICS is an important tool for gathering standardised, scientifically sound and nationally representative information. These surveys provide valuable insights on socio-economic standings and various health-related indicators. The survey dataset and findings have been made publicly available on UNICEF’s MICS website at (https://mics.unicef.org/surveys). The current study accessed the children and women datasets from each of Bangladesh’s MICS rounds of 2012–13 and 2019. Both of the surveys used a probability-based sampling method and a two-stage sample selection procedure. Census enumeration areas were identified systematically using the probability proportional to size method. This was followed by the selection of twenty households from each enumeration area (55 120 and 64 400 households for 2012–13 and 2019, respectively). More comprehensive information on the MICS methodology can be found elsewhere(19,20) .

Children aged < 60 months were included in this study from the publicly accessible datasets and merged with the women ‘wm’ dataset following MICS guidelines for data merging. Cases with ‘missing values’ for age and biologically implausible or inappropriate anthropometric values were excluded (< –5 sd or > 5 sd for WHZ, < –5 sd or > 5 sd for HAZ, < –6 sd or > 5 sd for WAZ)(Reference Corsi, Perkins and Subramanian21). Finally, 20 885 children from 2012 to 13 and 23 061 from 2019 survey rounds were included in the study. The procedure used to select children for this investigation is described in detail in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Selection of study participants using combined Bangladesh MICS data from 2012 to 13 and 2019. MICS, Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey.

Operational definition of the dependent variables

According to the WHO, malnutrition among children can be defined as the excess, deficiency or imbalance in the intake of nutrients and or energy(Reference Black, Allen and Bhutta1). We defined the nutritional indicators as per the WHO child growth standards (2006) in this analysis(3).

Stunting: Stunting was defined as height/length-for-age z score < –2 standard deviations (sd)

Wasting: Wasting was defined as weight-for-height/length z score < –2 sds

Underweight: Underweight was defined as weight-for-age z score < –2 sds

A composite variable ‘Type of malnutrition’ was created by combining stunting, wasting and underweight, which had three categories:

Absent: If the participant did not suffer from any of the three defined forms of malnutrition

Single form of malnutrition (SFM): If the participant was suffering from any one of the three defined forms of malnutrition

Coexisting forms of malnutrition (CFM): If the participant was suffering from more than one of the three defined forms of malnutrition simultaneously

Independent variables

The current study considered the MICS dataset and selected independent variables on an apriori basis. The variables included are the child’s age (in months), sex (male/female), residence (urban/rural), ever breastfed (yes/no), childhood illness (yes/no), mothers age in years, maternal education, size at birth (average/larger/smaller), maternal media exposure (not exposed/exposed) and wealth index (poorest/poor/middle/rich/richest). For 2012–13 survey, the variable religion (Islam/Hinduism/Buddhism/Christianity/Others) and for 2019 survey, ethnicity (Bengali/Others) and maternal life satisfaction (satisfied/neutral/dissatisfied) were additionally added. A dummy variable (age group in months) was created for the trend test which had five categories: ‘0–12 months’, ‘13–24 months’, ‘25–36 months’, ‘37–48 months’ and ‘49–59 months’ for both survey years.

Mother’s education

The variable ‘mother’s education’ was categorised differently in the two survey years. For the survey year 2012–13, the categories were none, primary incomplete, secondary incomplete, secondary complete or higher. However, for the survey year 2019, it was pre-primary or none, primary, secondary, higher secondary or more.

Wealth index

The study categorised participants into different socio-economic groups based on a wealth index, which is used to place participants into one of five wealth categories: poorest, poor, middle, rich and richest, by taking inventory of observable household items and amenities(Reference Al Fidah and Efa22,Reference Al Fidah, Nabin and Efa23) . This method provides an opportunity to gauge relative economic standing without directly measuring income or expenditures(Reference Al Fidah, Islam and Rahman24,Reference Al Fidah, Haider and Roy25) . A dummy variable was also created having two categories, ‘poor-to-middle’ (combining poorest, poor and middle quintiles) and ‘rich’ (combining richest and rich quintiles).

Maternal life satisfaction

Maternal life satisfaction was measured using a single item: ‘First, taking all things together, would you say you are very happy, somewhat happy, neither happy nor unhappy, somewhat unhappy or very unhappy?’ Out of five possible responses, ‘very happy’ and ‘somewhat happy’ was categorised as ‘satisfied’, ‘neither happy nor unhappy’ as ‘neutral’ and ‘somewhat unhappy or very unhappy’ as ‘dissatisfied’.

Size at birth

Child’s size at birth was measured using a single item: ‘When (name of the child) was born, was (he/she) very large, larger than average, average, smaller than average, or very small?’ The current study categorised ‘very large’ and ‘larger than average’ as ‘large’, ‘average’ as ‘average’ and ‘smaller than average’ and ‘very small’ as ‘small’.

Maternal media exposure

‘Maternal media exposure’ was created using the summation of three variables: ‘frequency of reading newspaper or magazine’, ‘frequency of listening to the radio’ and ‘frequency of watching TV’. This variable has two categories as per previous literature: not exposed (0 score) and exposed (> 0 score)(Reference Fatema and Lariscy26).

Statistical analysis

In this study, descriptive statistics were presented as frequency and percentage for categorical variables and median and IQR for continuous variables. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was conducted on continuous variables, and all were found to be significantly deviated (P-value < 0·05) from normal distribution. The χ2 goodness-of-fit test was used to assess whether the wealth index of participants with CFM across two survey years was significantly different. The Binomial proportion test was applied to determine the statistical significance of the difference between the prevalence of CFM across two survey years. Kruskal—Wallis test, χ2 test of association and Fisher’s exact test were used to evaluate the association between independent and outcome variables. The Cochran–Armitage test for trend was conducted to evaluate changes in the trend of CFM across participant’s age. We used bivariate screening method to select variables for the multinomial logistic regression models. A P-value of < 0·05 was considered as significant in the bivariate screening method where only participants with non-missing values were considered. Separate multinomial logistic regression models were developed for each of the survey years (2012–13 and 2019). We adjusted for age and sex to calculate the adjusted OR for each predictor variable, as such missing values for one variable did not have any effect on the adjusted OR for other variables. The adjusted OR (after adjusting for age and sex) and 95 % CI were reported. The slope index of inequality (SII) was used to compare and quantify the association between the wealth index and CFM across both surveys. It quantifies absolute inequality by measuring the difference in an indicator between the most advantaged and most disadvantaged groups while accounting for all intermediate subgroups.(Reference Schlotheuber and Hosseinpoor27) To calculate the SII, the entire population is ranked from the most disadvantaged subgroup (rank 0) to the most advantaged subgroup (rank 1), with rankings weighted by each subgroup’s proportional population size. The indicator of interest is then regressed against these midpoint values using an appropriate model. Predicted values of the indicator are calculated for the extremes (rank 0 and rank 1), and the difference between these values gives the SII. An SII value of zero indicates no inequality. For our study, a negative coefficient indicates that CFM is concentrated among the poorest quintile than the richest quintile.(Reference Schlotheuber and Hosseinpoor27) A P-value of < 0·05 was considered statistically significant (α = 0·05). All descriptive and inferential analysis was done using STATA 17.

Results

We have included 43 946 children from the two MICS surveys where 20 885 were selected from the year 2012–13 and 23 061 belonged to the year 2019. In 2012–13, 52·35 % (n 10 934) children did not have any form of malnutrition, 20·20 % (n 4219) children had SFM and 27·45 % (n 5732) children had CFM. For 2019, this proportion was 63·57 % (n 14 661), 17·86 % (n 4119) and 18·57 % (n 4281), respectively. Table 1 describes the socio-demographic characteristics among under-5 children and their associations with types of malnutrition across two survey years.

Table 1. Association between types of undernutrition and socio-demographic variables across survey years (2012–13, 2019)

SFM, single form of malnutrition; CFM, coexisting form of malnutrition. Statistically significant p-values are indicated in bold.

* Kruskal–Wallis test.

** Childhood illness: diarrhoea and cough (for 2012–13); diarrhoea, fever and cough (for 2019).

*** Fisher’s exact test.

Socio-demographic characteristics

During the survey year 2012–13, the median (IQR) age was higher among the CFM group (34 (20–46) months) compared with the non-malnourished group where the association was statistically significant (28 (12–45); P-value < 0·001). Several factors were found to be significantly associated with different types of malnutrition, including residence, maternal age, maternal education, size at birth, maternal media exposure and wealth index. Most of the children (84·07 %) were from rural areas, which was also the case among each type of malnutrition. Additionally, around 60 % of mothers in all groups fell into the age categories of 20–24 or 25–29, with over 33·79 % not completing secondary education. In the CFM group, specifically, 31·47 % of mothers had no formal education, and 50·46 % was exposed to media. Regarding the wealth index, 29·97 % belonged to the poorest group, which was true for each of the malnutrition groups.

In the survey year 2019, several factors were found to be significantly associated with malnutrition types, including the age of child, residence, size at birth, breastfeeding history, childhood illness, maternal age, maternal education, ethnicity, caregiver of other children, maternal life satisfaction, maternal media exposure and wealth index. Among children with CFM, the median (IQR) age was 32 (18–45) months, with 27·99 % being smaller in size at birth. Furthermore, 85·07 % of these children lived in rural areas, and 33·71 % belonged to the poorest wealth index category. Overall, 95·62 % of children were breastfed at some point before the survey, while among CFM cases, it was 94·64 %. More than half of the mothers in each type of malnourished children belonged to the 20–24 years or 25–29 years age group.

Variations in CFM prevalence across surveys

Figure 2 shows a decrease in the prevalence of CFM from 27·45 % (95 % CI: 26·86 %, 28·05 %; n 5732) in the 2012–13 survey to 18·56 % (95 % CI: 18·07 %, 19·07 %; n 4281) in 2019, which was statistically significant (P-value < 0·001).

Figure 2. Prevalence of CFM across survey years (2012–13, 2019). CFM, coexisting forms of malnutrition.

Figure 3 shows a statistically significant rise in the trend of CFM from 3·5 % among participants aged 0–12 months to 5·8 % among 49–59 months in the survey year 2012–13. However, the maximum proportion was 6·5 % in the age group 37–48 months followed by 6·2 % in 25–36 months. A similar rising trend was also observed in the survey year 2019 where the proportion of CFM raised from 2·7 % to 3·7 % with a maximum of 4·2 % in age groups 25–36 months and 37–48 months.

Figure 3. Trend of CFM across participant’s age groups in survey years (2012–13, 2019). CFM, coexisting forms of malnutrition.

Figure 4 represents the distribution of wealth index among participants who were suffering from CFM across both survey years. Higher percentage of CFM was observed among rich families in 2019 compared with 2012–13 (24·50 % and 20·15 %, respectively) which was significantly different (P-value < 0·001).

Figure 4. Proportion of wealthier quintile families among participants with CFM. CFM, coexisting forms of malnutrition.

Slope index of inequality analysis

The SII is presented in Figure 5. The negative values of the coefficient for survey years 2012–13 and 2019 (Coef.: –0·239, 95 % CI: –0·259, –0·218; Coef.: –0·175, 95 % CI: –0·192, –0·157 respectively) indicate that belonging to richer quintile families was significantly associated with lesser likelihood of under-5 children suffering from CFM.

Figure 5. Slope index of inequality (SII) for the prevalence of coexisting forms of malnutrition according to wealth quintiles across survey years; (a) for 2012–13; (b) for 2019. CFM, coexisting forms of malnutrition.

Multinomial logistic regression analysis

Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed after adjusting for the age and sex of the child across both the survey years in Table 2. In the survey year 2012–13, the model showed that place of residence, maternal age in years, maternal education, size at birth, maternal media exposure and wealth index had significant effects on the type of malnutrition. The children living in urban areas had lower odds of CFM (aOR = 0·70, 95 % CI: 0·64, 0·77, P-value < 0·001) and SFM (aOR = 0·78, 95 % CI: 0·71, 0·86, P-value < 0·001) when compared with children without malnutrition that are living in rural areas. Mothers age group (in years) up to 35–39 were found to have lower odds of CFM, which was statistically significant. Considering the size of the child at birth, if the child was of larger size, the odds for CFM (aOR = 0·62, 95 % CI: 0·52, 0·73, P-value < 0·001) and SFM (aOR = 0·73, 95 % CI: 0·62, 0·85, P-value < 0·001) decreased, but if it was smaller, the odds of CFM (aOR = 2·32, 95 % CI: 2·06, 2·61, P-value < 0·001) and SFM (aOR = 1·42, 95 % CI: 1·24, 1·62, P-value < 0·001) increased. Moreover, when mothers completed secondary level education, the odds of CFM decreased (aOR = 0·28, 95 % CI: 0·24, 0·32, P-value < 0·001) along with SFM (aOR = 0·45, 95 % CI: 0·40, 0·52, P-value < 0·001). Also, when considering maternal media exposure, if the mother was exposed to media, the odds of CFM decreased (aOR = 0·61, 95 % CI: 0·56, 0·66, P-value < 0·001) compared with those with no media exposure. The results from Table 2 also showed that when the wealth index increased to be on the richer side, the odds of CFM and SFM decreased compared with those with no malnutrition and the poorest group, which was statistically significant.

Table 2. Age- and sex-adjusted multinomial logistic regression models across two survey years (2012–13, 2019) presenting the association between predictor variables and types of malnutrition

Reference level: Type of malnutrition ‘absent’. CFM, coexisting forms of malnutrition. Statistically significant p-values are indicated in bold.

In Table 2, when considering the survey year 2019, we observed that the findings of predictor variables such as residence, mother’s age, maternal education, child’s size at birth, maternal media exposure and wealth index were similar to the survey year 2012–13. Also, if the caregiver had another child that increased the odds of both malnutrition categories (CFM: aOR = 1·25, 95 % CI: 1·15, 1·35, P-value < 0·001; SFM: aOR = 1·17, 95 % CI: 1·08, 1·27, P-value < 0·001), while childhood illness increased the odds of CFM (aOR = 1·14, 95 % CI: 1·06, 1·23, P-value < 0·001). However, if the mother is satisfied with her life, then it decreases the odds of both (CFM: aOR = 0·63, 95 % CI: 0·57, 0·7, P-value < 0·001; SFM: aOR = 0·79, 95 % CI: 0·71, 0·89, P-value < 0·001).

Discussion

This study presents the prevalence of CFM in Bangladesh, its prevalence across both survey years (2012–13, 2019) and related factors affecting CFM. In both the survey years, we could see that the child’s residence, mother’s age, maternal education, size at the time of birth, mother’s exposure to media and wealth index affected CFM similarly. Although CFM presented a decreasing prevalence from years 2012–13 to 2019, the overall prevalence of this nutritional disorder is still high in the country. Further analysis revealed that children from poorer families suffered from CFM more compared with the richer families in both survey years.

Bangladesh, a South Asian country, is burdened with a high prevalence of wasting, underweight and stunting among under-5 children(8). For example, in case of severe wasting, more than 0·3 million under-5 children reside in the country, which is one of the major positions among other Asian countries(Reference Islam, Fahim and Rasul28). So, it is no surprise that the prevalence of CFM is also high in the country. In our study, we found that CFM exhibits a downward prevalence across the survey years. This is mostly due to the fact that the Bangladesh government has taken the burden of malnutrition among children seriously. The National Nutrition Service, Institute of Public Health Nutrition (IPHN), non-profit research organisations like icddr,b are working together to achieve the Health, Population and Nutrition Sector Program (HPNSP) target to reduce the prevalence of malnutrition in the country(8). The prevalence of wasting, which was precariously high in 2011 at 16 %, descended to 11 % in 2022(8). Also, the prevalence of stunting and underweight dropped to 24 % and 22 % in 2022 from the year 2011, where the percentages were 41 % and 36 %, respectively(8). The government has also taken multiple steps countrywide and integrated guideline-based management protocols in the hospitals to combat malnutrition in children(Reference Islam, Fahim and Rasul2830). For example, a recent study found that the physicians in government hospitals had adequate knowledge and a positive attitude while treating malnourished children(Reference Islam, Fahim and Rasul28). All of these factors might have influenced the decreasing prevalence of CFM in the country.

Community-level socio-demographic and economic factors play a vital role in the prevalence of malnutrition(Reference Ahmad, Afzal and Imtiaz31Reference Das and Gulshan33). Characteristics like socio-economic condition, parents’ educational status, place of residence, childhood illness and several other factors can affect the nutritional status of a child in developing countries(Reference Talukder32Reference Prasadajudio, Devaera and Noormanto34). A study conducted using multiple Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey surveys (1996–1997, 1999–2000, 2004, 2007 and 2011) examined the trend of childhood malnutrition and the impact maternal education has on it. The authors reported a consistently significant association where lower maternal education favours childhood malnutrition(Reference Hasan, Soares Magalhaes and Williams35). Another study conducted in Bangladesh also supports this finding(Reference Nahar and Zahangir36). A 2023 study conducted in Bangladesh found that parental education and occupation had a profound impact on undernutrition among under-5 children in both urban and rural areas of Bangladesh. The findings indicated that children whose fathers worked low-paying jobs, for example, in the agricultural field, were more likely to experience wasting, stunting, or underweight conditions(Reference Nahar and Zahangir36). Another Bangladeshi survey also reported that children from the poorest quintiles had three times higher odds of getting affected by wasting(Reference Das and Gulshan33). A household’s low economic status directly affects its purchasing power, which in turn influences the availability of nutritious food, resulting in food insecurity(Reference Asim and Nawaz37). Households that face social and economic challenges can be associated with decreased physical growth, mostly due to facts like poor food consumption, chronic illnesses, unhygienic lifestyle, insufficient access to pure water, etc.(Reference Ahmad, Afzal and Imtiaz31). In both our multinomial logistic regression analysis and SII, we have observed that CFM was more likely to be associated with children emerging from poorer families compared with children from richer families. These findings can be justified by the above discussion. Additionally, another study conducted among Bangladeshi under-5 children using nationally representative data reported that CFM is favoured by families that belong to lower wealth index quintiles(Reference Sumon, Hossain and Ar Salan38). An interesting finding from our analysis showed that over the years CFM has increased among richer families, though the percentage is still low. A significant rise in CFM was observed in the year 2019 compared with the year 2012–13. A recent paper from Bangladesh showed that stunting was present among children whose mothers were engaged in different income-generating activities(Reference Haque, Choudhury and Wahid39). It can be hypothesised that as both father and mother are participating in earning activities in rich families the children are left at home to unskilled caregivers who have little knowledge about nutrition. The daycare system is also underdeveloped in an LMIC country like Bangladesh. These factors might be affecting the rise of malnutrition among rich families which needs further evaluation.

When it comes to the topic of childhood malnutrition, the urban–rural divergence has remained persistent over the years(Reference Srinivasan, Zanello and Shankar40). This pertains to the difference in socio-economic status, poor accessibility to healthcare facilities, medicine, education and various other factors(Reference Das and Gulshan33). Multiple studies have reported that rural children are more prone to nutritional deficiency and tend to become malnourished, which corresponds to our findings(Reference Nahar and Zahangir36,Reference Srinivasan, Zanello and Shankar40) . Our study also indicated that maternal age and education are important predictors of CFM, and if the mother was older and received more education, the odds of her children suffering from CFM decreased. A Bangladeshi study found that children from illiterate fathers or mothers were more likely (approximately 20–30 %) to remain underweight or stunted compared with parents who received higher education(Reference Das and Gulshan33). This was coherent with earlier studies conducted in Bangladesh, which found a significant impact of parenteral education on both SFM and CFM(Reference Hasan, Soares Magalhaes and Williams35,Reference Nahar and Zahangir36,Reference Sumon, Hossain and Ar Salan38) . Mothers who are older and educated possess a clear perception and greater understanding regarding the nutrition and health of the children, healthcare-seeking behaviour, improved care of the child, washing, hygiene and sanitation practices. So, it is understandable that these factors are affecting CFM among children. Also, children born with low birth weight are more likely to suffer from different forms of malnutrition, which is consistent with the findings from our study(Reference Jana, Dey and Ghosh41). Previous works of literature found that mothers who are exposed to media have better awareness regarding healthcare practices and can significantly decrease malnutrition through household actions(Reference Fatema and Lariscy26,Reference Huo, Wang and Liu42) . This corresponds to our study results as well. Children whose mothers were happy or satisfied with their lives had lower odds of suffering from CFM, according to our study. An article presented that mothers who were unmarried or cohabiting and had low family incomes were more likely to have malnourished children(Reference Tette, Sifah and Nartey43). Similarly, poverty-stricken families have lower life satisfaction, which can affect the growth of their children. Another important finding of our study was that children who suffered from illnesses were more vulnerable to CFM. Diseases related to undernutrition can progress to acute or chronic conditions. This mostly occurs due to energy imbalance, high catabolism rate, decreased appetite and increased energy consumption(Reference Prasadajudio, Devaera and Noormanto34,Reference Mehta, Corkins and Lyman44) . So, repeated illness can progress to undernutrition in children. A similar finding was reported by Sumon et al., who found a significant association between CFM and childhood illness(Reference Sumon, Hossain and Ar Salan38).

As a nationally representative sampling method was used in both surveys, this study can be considered to have painted the actual picture of the burden of CFM. Although a few studies have been conducted before focusing on the existence of multiple nutritional disorders, the definition of different types of malnutrition in two different time periods is unique to this study. However, it also had some limitations. Due to the cross-sectional nature of the study design, establishing a causal relationship was not possible. Key variables, like food history, maternal malnutrition, trend etc., were not considered due to unavailability, which would have been interesting to explore.

Conclusion

The current study indicates that malnutrition is still a colossal public health concern in an LMIC like Bangladesh. The study findings evaluated the prevalence, trends and several determinants of CFM among children in the country. This article should capture the attention of researchers, policymakers and stakeholders regarding the CFM, a topic that is considered minor in the field of nutrition research. The authors propose further prospective studies to investigate the outcomes of CFM in community as well as hospital settings. In light of the findings, the authors recommend enhancing maternal education programmes and providing financial assistance to vulnerable families that can improve child nutrition. Scaling up initiatives like the National Nutrition Service and public awareness campaigns by leveraging media to promote knowledge of nutrition, hygiene and healthcare-seeking behaviours can reduce the burden of SFM and CFM. Collaboration between multiple sectors can prove to be a beneficial way forward in achieving sustainable reductions in childhood malnutrition.

Acknowledgements

We thank the interviewees and all staff members of the MICS survey who were involved in the project planning and data collection. The authors work at icddr,b and are grateful to the Governments of Bangladesh and Canada for providing unrestricted support to the organisation.

Authorship

M.R.I., M.F.A.F., T.A. and S.N. conceived and designed the study. M.R.I., M.F.A.F. and M.M.R. were involved in data handling, cleaning and analysis. M.R.I., M.F.A.F. and M.M.R. interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. S.N. and T.A. critically reviewed and edited the manuscript. All the author(s) read and approved the final manuscript for submission.

Financial support

This study does not have any funding to report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics of human subject participation

This study utilises secondary data obtained from the MICS, where all personally identifiable information has been removed to ensure anonymity. As the study used secondary data, no ethical clearance is required. However, prior to data collection, ethical clearance was obtained from the relevant authority by the implementing body. Written informed consents were also taken prior to the commencement of the interview from the participants.

References

Black, RE, Allen, LH, Bhutta, ZA et al. (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 371, 243260.Google Scholar
Black, RE, Victora, CG, Walker, SP et al. (2013) Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 382, 427451.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2006) WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/Height-for-Age, Weight-for-Age, Weight-for-Length, Weight-for-Height and Body Mass Index-for-Age: Methods and Development. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Soliman, A, De Sanctis, V, Alaaraj, N et al. (2021) Early and long-term consequences of nutritional stunting: from childhood to adulthood. Acta Bio Med: Atenei Parmensis 92, e2021168.Google Scholar
Islam, MR, Nuzhat, S, Alam, J et al. (2023) Inpatient morbidity and mortality of severely underweight children was comparable to that of severely wasted children in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Am J Trop Med Hyg 109, 698703.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2024) Child Mortality (Under 5 Years). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/levels-and-trends-in-child-under-5-mortality-in-2020 (accessed 15 March 2024).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2023) Levels and Trends in Child Malnutrition: UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Group Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates, Key Findings of the 2023 Edition. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240073791 (accessed 27 April 2024).Google Scholar
(NIPORT) NIoPRaT (2023) Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey BDHS 2022: Key Indicators. Dhaka, Bangladesh; Rockville, MD: NIPORT.Google Scholar
Khaliq, A, Wraith, D, Nambiar, S et al. (2022) A review of the prevalence, trends, and determinants of coexisting forms of malnutrition in neonates, infants, and children. BMC Public Health 22, 879.Google Scholar
Garenne, M, Myatt, M, Khara, T et al. (2019) Concurrent wasting and stunting among under-five children in Niakhar, Senegal. Maternal Child Nutr 15, e12736.Google Scholar
Biswas, T, Townsend, N, Magalhaes, RS et al. (2019) Current progress and future directions in the double burden of malnutrition among women in South and Southeast Asian countries. Curr Dev Nutr 3, nzz026.Google Scholar
McDonald, CM, Olofin, I, Flaxman, S et al. (2013) The effect of multiple anthropometric deficits on child mortality: meta-analysis of individual data in 10 prospective studies from developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr 97, 896901.Google Scholar
Abdulla, F, El-Raouf, MA, Rahman, A et al. (2023) Prevalence and determinants of wasting among under-5 Egyptian children: application of quantile regression. Food Sci Nutr 11, 10731083.Google Scholar
Hossain, MM, Abdulla, F & Rahman, A (2023) Prevalence and risk factors of underweight among under-5 children in Bangladesh: evidence from a countrywide cross-sectional study. PLoS One 18, e0284797.Google Scholar
Panda, BK, Mohanty, SK, Nayak, I et al. (2020) Malnutrition and poverty in India: does the use of public distribution system matter? BMC Nutr 6, 114.Google Scholar
Rahman, MA, Halder, HR, Rahman, MS et al. (2021) Poverty and childhood malnutrition: evidence-based on a nationally representative survey of Bangladesh. PLoS One 16, e0256235.Google Scholar
Félix-Beltrán, L, Macinko, J & Kuhn, R (2021) Maternal height and double-burden of malnutrition households in Mexico: stunted children with overweight or obese mothers. Public Health Nutr 24, 106116.Google Scholar
Rahman, A & Hossain, MM (2022) Quantile regression approach to estimating prevalence and determinants of child malnutrition. J Public Health 117.Google Scholar
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics UB (2014) Bangladesh Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2012–2013, ProgotirPathey: Final Reports. Dhaka, Bangladesh: BBS.Google Scholar
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics UB (2019) ProgotirPathey Bangladesh, Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2019: Survey Finding Report. Dhaka, Bangladesh: BBS.Google Scholar
Corsi, DJ, Perkins, JM & Subramanian, S (2017) Child anthropometry data quality from Demographic and Health Surveys, Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys, and National Nutrition Surveys in the West Central Africa region: are we comparing apples and oranges? Global Health Action 10, 1328185.Google Scholar
Al Fidah, MF & Efa, SS (2023) Skin-to-skin contact and early initiation of breast feeding in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study using MICS6, Bangladesh (2019) data. BMJ Paediatrics Open 7, e002163.Google Scholar
Al Fidah, MF, Nabin, AA & Efa, SS (2024) Factors associated with acute respiratory infection and healthcare-seeking behaviour among primary caregivers in Bangladesh: a study based on MICS 2019. BMJ Public Health 2, e000576.Google Scholar
Al Fidah, MF, Islam, MR, Rahman, MM et al. (2025) Community-level expenses for under-5 diarrhoeal cases prior to reporting at Dhaka Hospital: a cross-sectional analysis in Bangladesh. Clin Epidemiol Global Health 31, 101846.Google Scholar
Al Fidah, MF, Haider, T, Roy, D et al. (2024) Temporal trends of diarrheal diseases and associated treatment responses among children aged under five: insight from the multiple Indicator Cluster surveys from 2006 to 2019. Pediatrics & Neonatology. Epub ahead of print. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2024.03.010 Google Scholar
Fatema, K & Lariscy, JT (2020) Mass media exposure and maternal healthcare utilization in South Asia. SSM-Population Health 11, 100614.Google Scholar
Schlotheuber, A & Hosseinpoor, AR (2022) Summary measures of health inequality: a review of existing measures and their application. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19, 3697.Google Scholar
Islam, MR, Fahim, SM, Rasul, MG et al. (2022) Health care providers’ knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding facility-based management of children with severe acute malnutrition in Bangladesh. Food Nutr Bull 43, 465478.Google Scholar
(IPHN) IoPHN (2017) National Guidelines for the Facility-based Management of Children with Severe Acute Malnutrition in Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
(IPHN) IoPHN (2011) National Guidelines for the Community-Based Management of Children with Severe Acute Malnutrition in Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Ahmad, D, Afzal, M & Imtiaz, A (2020) Effect of socioeconomic factors on malnutrition among children in Pakistan. Future Bus J 6, 111.Google Scholar
Talukder, A (2017) Factors associated with malnutrition among under-five children: illustration using Bangladesh demographic and health survey, 2014 data. Children 4, 88.Google Scholar
Das, S & Gulshan, J (2017) Different forms of malnutrition among under five children in Bangladesh: a cross sectional study on prevalence and determinants. BMC Nutr 3, 112.Google Scholar
Prasadajudio, M, Devaera, Y, Noormanto, N et al. (2023) Disease-related malnutrition in pediatric patients with chronic disease: a developing country perspective. Curr Dev Nutr 7, 100021.Google Scholar
Hasan, MT, Soares Magalhaes, RJ, Williams, GM et al. (2016) The role of maternal education in the 15-year trajectory of malnutrition in children under 5 years of age in Bangladesh. Matern Child Nutr 12, 929939.Google Scholar
Nahar, MZ & Zahangir, MS (2024) The role of parental education and occupation on undernutrition among children under five in Bangladesh: a rural-urban comparison. Plos one 19, e0307257.Google Scholar
Asim, M & Nawaz, Y (2018) Child malnutrition in Pakistan: evidence from literature. Children 5, 60.Google Scholar
Sumon, IH, Hossain, M, Ar Salan, S et al. (2023) Determinants of coexisting forms of undernutrition among under-five children: evidence from the Bangladesh demographic and health surveys. Food Sci Nutr 11, 52585269.Google Scholar
Haque, MA, Choudhury, N, Wahid, BZ et al. (2023) A predictive modelling approach to illustrate factors correlating with stunting among children aged 12–23 months: a cluster randomised pre-post study. BMJ open 13, e067961.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, CS, Zanello, G & Shankar, B (2013) Rural-urban disparities in child nutrition in Bangladesh and Nepal. BMC Public Health 13, 115.Google Scholar
Jana, A, Dey, D & Ghosh, R (2023) Contribution of low birth weight to childhood undernutrition in India: evidence from the national family health survey 2019–2021. BMC Public Health 23, 1336.Google Scholar
Huo, S, Wang, K, Liu, Z et al. (2022) Influence of maternal exposure to mass media on growth stunting among children under five: mediation analysis through the water, sanitation, and hygiene program. JMIR Public Health Surveillance 8, e33394.Google Scholar
Tette, EM, Sifah, EK, Nartey, ET et al. (2016) Maternal profiles and social determinants of malnutrition and the MDGs: what have we learnt? BMC Public Health 16, 111.Google Scholar
Mehta, NM, Corkins, MR, Lyman, B et al. (2013) Defining pediatric malnutrition: a paradigm shift toward etiology-related definitions. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr 37, 460481.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Selection of study participants using combined Bangladesh MICS data from 2012 to 13 and 2019. MICS, Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey.

Figure 1

Table 1. Association between types of undernutrition and socio-demographic variables across survey years (2012–13, 2019)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Prevalence of CFM across survey years (2012–13, 2019). CFM, coexisting forms of malnutrition.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Trend of CFM across participant’s age groups in survey years (2012–13, 2019). CFM, coexisting forms of malnutrition.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Proportion of wealthier quintile families among participants with CFM. CFM, coexisting forms of malnutrition.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Slope index of inequality (SII) for the prevalence of coexisting forms of malnutrition according to wealth quintiles across survey years; (a) for 2012–13; (b) for 2019. CFM, coexisting forms of malnutrition.

Figure 6

Table 2. Age- and sex-adjusted multinomial logistic regression models across two survey years (2012–13, 2019) presenting the association between predictor variables and types of malnutrition