Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T06:44:13.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mental rotation of objects versus hands: Neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2001

STEPHEN M. KOSSLYN ,
GREGORY J. DIGIROLAMO ,
WILLIAM L. THOMPSON  and
NATHANIEL M. ALPERT
STEPHEN M. KOSSLYN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
GREGORY J. DIGIROLAMO
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
WILLIAM L. THOMPSON
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
NATHANIEL M. ALPERT
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
Get access

Abstract

Twelve right-handed men participated in two mental rotation tasks as their regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was monitored using positron emission tomography. In one task, participants mentally rotated and compared figures composed of angular branching forms; in the other task, participants mentally rotated and compared drawings of human hands. In both cases, rCBF was compared with a baseline condition that used identical stimuli and required the same comparison, but in which rotation was not required. Mental rotation of branching objects engendered activation in the parietal lobe and Area 19. In contrast, mental rotation of hands engendered activation in the precentral gyrus (M1), superior and inferior parietal lobes, primary visual cortex, insula, and frontal Areas 6 and 9. The results suggest that at least two different mechanisms can be used in mental rotation, one mechanism that recruits processes that prepare motor movements and another mechanism that does not.

Keywords

Mental rotationMental imageryPositron emission tomographyCognitive neuroscience

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychophysiology , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , March 1998 , pp. 151 - 161
Copyright
1998 Society for Psychophysiological Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable