Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-56ltz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-30T08:48:40.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why College Students Drift Left: The Stability of Political Identity and Relative Malleability of Issue Positions among College Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2020

Matthew Woessner Open the ORCID record for Matthew Woessner [Opens in a new window]  and
April Kelly-Woessner
Matthew Woessner
Affiliation:
The United States Army War College
April Kelly-Woessner
Affiliation:
Elizabethtown College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In considering the liberalizing effect of college on students’ political values, we argue that political identities—in the form of self-identified ideology or partisanship—are components of social identity and are resistant to change. Using data from the Higher Education Research Institute’s student surveys, we show that what movement in identity does occur is mostly a regression to the mean effect. On several issue positions, however, students move in a more uniform leftward direction. We find that liberal drift on issues is most common among students majoring in the arts and humanities. Self-reported ideology does drift left at liberal arts colleges, but this is explained by a peer effect: students at liberal arts colleges drift more to the left because they have more liberal peers. The results have implications for future research on college student political development, suggesting that attitudinal change can be more easily identified by examining shifts in policy preferences rather than changes in political identity.

Information

Type
Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , October 2020 , pp. 657 - 664
Copyright
© American Political Science Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Astin, Alexander W. 1993. What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bailey, Mandi, and Williams, Lee R.. 2016. “Are College Students Really Liberal? An Exploration of Student Political Ideology and Attitudes toward Policies Impacting Minorities.” Social Science Journal 53 (3): 309–17.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Licari, Frederick C.. 1989. “Education and Political Tolerance: Testing the Effects of Cognitive Sophistication and Target Group Affect.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53 (3): 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzendahl, Catherine I., and Myers, Daniel J.. 2004. “Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998.” Social Forces 83 (2): 759–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard A., and Rothenberg, Lawrence S.. 1988. “The Instability of Partisanship: An Analysis of the 1980 Presidential Election.” British Journal of Political Science 18 (4): 445–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, Colin, and Horowitz, Jonathan. 2016. “Does College Influence Sociopolitical Attitudes?” Sociology of Education 89 (1): 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Christopher, and Stimson, James A.. 2012. Ideology in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Jackson, John E.. 1983. “The Dynamics of Party Identification.” American Political Science Review 77 (4): 957–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Palmquist, Bradley. 1990. “Of Artifacts and Partisan Instability.” American Journal of Political Science 34:872–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Palmquist, Bradley. 1994. “How Stable Is Party Identification?” Political Behavior 16 (4): 437–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Higher Education Research Institute (HERI). 2018a. “Freshman Student Survey.” Available at https://heri.ucla.edu/cirp-freshman-survey.Google Scholar
Higher Education Research Institute (HERI). 2018b. “College Senior Survey.” Available at https://heri.ucla.edu/college-senior-survey.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Markus, Gregory B.. 1984. “Partisan Orientations over the Long Haul: Results from the Three-Wave Political Socialization Panel Study.” American Political Science Review 78 (4): 1000–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T., Federico, Christopher M., and Napier, Jaime L.. 2009. “Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities.” Annual Review of Psychology 60:307–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariani, Mark D., and Hewitt, Gordon J.. 2008. “Indoctrination U.? Faculty Ideology and Changes in Student Political Orientation.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (4): 773–83.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milem, Jeffrey F. 1998. “Attitude Change in College Students: Examining the Effect of College Peer Groups and Faculty Normative Groups.” Journal of Higher Education 69 (2): 117–40.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1976. “The Cross-National Use of Party Identification as a Stimulus to Political Inquiry.” In Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition, ed. Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Farlie, Dennis, 21–31. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1991. “Party Identification, Realignment, and Party Voting: Back to the Basics.” American Political Science Review 85 (2): 557–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., Shanks, J. Merrill, and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pascarella, Earnest T., and Terenzini, Patrick T.. 2005. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Rothman, Stanley, Kelly-Woessner, April, and Woessner, Matthew. 2011. The Still Divided Academy: How Competing Visions of Power, Politics, and Diversity Complicate the Mission of Higher Education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric, and Green, Donald Philip. 1997. “The Stability of Party Identification in Western Democracies: Results from Eight Panel Surveys.” Comparative Political Studies 30 (4): 450–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. 2004. Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woessner, Matthew, and Kelly-Woessner, April. 2009. “‘I Think My Professor Is a Democrat’: Considering Whether Students Recognize and React to Faculty Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (2): 343–52.Google Scholar