Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-31T14:04:54.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2016

Matthew C. MacWilliams
Matthew C. MacWilliams*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While the party decides theory explains the outcomes of past nomination battles for president, this year in the Republican presidential contest party insiders failed to anoint a standard bearer. Who decides when the party elites don’t? In 2016, it was America’s authoritarian voters. And their candidate of choice, Donald Trump, is anathema to party leaders. I argue that Trump’s rise is in part the result of authoritarian voters’ response to his unvarnished, us-versus-them rhetoric. The failure of Republican Party insiders to coalesce behind one candidate opened the door for Trump. Authoritarian-driven partisan polarization (Hetherington and Weiler 2009), increasing fear of real and imagined threats, and terrorist incidents abroad and at home provided the fuel for Trump’s campaign. And Trump’s message and manner ignited that fuel, propelling him to the Republican nomination for president.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 49 , Special Issue 4: Elections in Focus , October 2016 , pp. 716 - 721
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adorno, Theodor, Frenkel-Brunswick, Else, Levinson, Daniel J., and Sanford, Nevitt R.. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert. 2006. The Authoritarians. Online: theauthoritarians.com.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert. 1996. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert. 1988. Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert. 1981. Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1990. Issues Evolution: Race and the Transformation of America Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A..1986. “The Structure and Sequence of Issue Evolution.” American Political Science Review 80: 901–920.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008. The Party Decides. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Duckitt, John. 1989. “Authoritarianism and Group Identification: A New View of an Old Construct.” Political Psychology 10 (1): 63–84.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 2003. “Enforcing Social Conformity: A Theory of Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 24 (1): 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley and Stenner, Karen. 1997. “Perceived Threat and Authoritarianism.” Political Psychology 18: 741–70.Google Scholar
Fischer, David H. 1989. Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich. 1941. Escape From Freedom. New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc and Suhay, Elizabeth. 2011. “Authoritarianism, Threat, and Americans’ Support for the War on Terror.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 546–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc and Weiler, Jonathan. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition,” Psychological Bulletin 129: 339–75.Google Scholar
Lavine, Howard, Lodge, Milton, and Freitas, Kate. 2005. “Threat, Authoritarianism, and Selective Exposure to Information.” Political Psychology 26: 219–44.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1959. “Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism.” American Sociological Review 24 (4): 482–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenner, Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar