Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vmslq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-22T14:51:10.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time to Rethink Your Teaching Ideology?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2021

Mark Carl Rom Open the ORCID record for Mark Carl Rom [Opens in a new window]
Mark Carl Rom*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Ideology in the Classroom
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 587 - 592
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

American Political Science Association (APSA). n.d. “Civic Education & Engagement.” www.apsanet.org/RESOURCES/For-Faculty/Civic-Education-amp-Engagement.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association (APSA). 2020a. “Join the Campaign–APSA RAISE the Vote Campaign.” Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
American Political Science Association (APSA). 2020b. “APSA Welcomes New Organized Sections: Civic Engagement and Education Politics and Policy.” Political Science Now. https://politicalsciencenow.com/apsa-welcomes-new-organized-sections-civic-engagement-and-education-politics-and-policy. Accessed March 17, 2021.Google Scholar
Anstead, Nick. 2021. What Do We Know and What Should We Do About Fake News? Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Taylor, Andrew J.. 2019. “Partisan Affiliation in Political Science: Insights from Florida and North Carolina.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): 706–10.Google Scholar
Braidwood, Travis, and Ausderan, Jacob. 2017. “Professor Favorability and Student Perceptions of Professor Ideology.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (2): 565–70.Google Scholar
Burmila, Edward. 2021. “Liberal Bias in the College Classroom: A Review of the Evidence (or Lack Thereof).” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S1049096521000354.Google Scholar
Campbell, James E. 2019. “The Trust is Gone: What Ideological Orthodoxy Costs Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): 715–19.Google Scholar
Cohn, Nate. 2019. “Nonvoters Are a Source of Hope for Democrats. but Maybe a False Hope.” New York Times, November 7. www.nytimes.com/2019/11/07/upshot/nonvoters-2020-presidential-election.html.Google Scholar
Colby, Anne. 2007. Educating for Democracy: Preparing Undergraduates for Responsible Political Engagement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N. 2012. “The Politics of Motivation.” Critical Review 24 (2): 199–216. DOI:10.1080/08913811.2012.711022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edyvane, Derek. 2017. “The Passion for Civility.” Political Studies Review 15 (3): 344–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, Kevin, and Sclofsky, Sebastian. 2021. “Still Pluralist After All These Years? Considering Whether Political Science Fosters Tolerance for Dissent or Merely Promotes Leftist Values.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S1049096521000342.Google Scholar
Goens, George A. 2019. Civility Lost: The Media, Politics, and Education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gormley, William T. 2017. The Critical Advantage: Developing Critical Thinking Skills in School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Phillip W. 2019. “Diagnosis Versus Ideological Diversity—Corrigendum.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): 771. doi:10.1017/S1049096519001276.Google Scholar
Herbst, Susan. 2010. Rude Democracy: Civility and Incivility in American Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Herbst, Susan. 2014. “Civility, Civic Discourse, and Civic Engagement: Inextricably Interwoven.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 18 (1): 5–10.Google Scholar
Hess, Diana E., and McAvoy, Paula. 2014. The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Journell, Wayne. 2019. “Professors, Are You Hiding Your Politics? Bad Idea.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, September 22.Google Scholar
Kahne, Joseph, and Bowyer, Benjamin. 2017. “Educating for Democracy in a Partisan Age: Confronting the Challenges of Motivated Reasoning and Misinformation.” American Educational Research Journal 54 (1): 3–34. DOI:10.3102/0002831216679817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavanagh, Jennifer, and Rich, Michael D.. 2018. “Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life.” RAND Corporation. www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2314.html.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel, Jacobson, Gary C., Kousser, Thad, and Vavreck, Lynn. 2019. The Logic of American Politics. Ninth edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press/SAGE.Google Scholar
Kollman, Ken. 2019. The American Political System. Third edition. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Arthur S.. 2000. “Three Steps Toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning.” In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, ed. McCubbins, Mathew D., Popkin, Samuel L., and Lupia, Arthur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J., Ginsberg, Benjamin, Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2018. American Government: Power and Purpose. Fifteenth edition. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Marineau, Josiah, and Williams, Shawn. 2019. “Intellectual Diversity at Religious Colleges.” PS: Political Science 52 (4): 711–14.Google Scholar
Matto, Elizabeth C., McCartney, Alison Rios Millett, and Simpson, Dick (eds.). 2017. Teaching Civic Engagement Across the Discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
McCartney, Alison Rios Millett, Bennion, Elizabeth A., and Simpson, Dick (eds.). 2013. Teaching Civic Engagement: From Student to Active Citizen. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Mower, Deborah, and Robison, Wade L. (eds.). 2012. Civility in Politics and Education. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nickerson, Raymond S. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2 (2): 175–220. DOI:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rom, Mark Carl. 2019. “A Liberal Polity: Ideological Homogeneity in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): 701–705.Google Scholar
Rom, Mark Carl, Abeledo, Jorge, Ellsworth, Randal, Martin, Noah, and Zuluaga, Lina. 2019. “Engaging Students in American Politics: Effort and Accomplishment.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Rom, Mark Carl, and Mitchell, Kristina. 2021. “Teaching Politics in a Call-Out Culture.” PS: Political Science and Politics. doi:10.1017/S1049096521000433.Google Scholar
Romano, Sarah T., and Daum, Courtenay W.. 2018. “Symposium: Transformative Practices of Teacher–Scholar–Activists in the Era of Trump.” New Political Science 40 (3): 515–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, Robert. 2020. “Why Civility Fails.” Medium, March 5. https://arcdigital.media/why-civility-fails-4778ad6499f3.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. Matthew. 2019. “The Nature and Consequences of Ideological Hegemony in American Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): 724–27.Google Scholar
Woessner, Matthew, and Kelly-Woessner, April. 2015. “Reflections on Academic Liberalism and Conservative Criticism.” Society 52 (1): 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woessner, Matthew, and Maranto, Robert. 2021. “Still Pluralist After All These Years? Considering Whether Political Science Fosters Tolerance for Dissent or Merely Promotes Leftist Values.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi:10.1017/S104909652100038X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Thomas, and Campbell, Curt. 2020. The Coronavirus Is Exposing the Limits of Populism. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Zigerell, LJ. 2019. “Left Unchecked: Political Hegemony in Political Science and the Flaws it Can Cause.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (4): 720–23.Google Scholar