Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-c8jtx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-07T23:54:12.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Values in a Threat Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2007

Michael Babula
Michael Babula
Affiliation:
Loyola College, Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Inglehart based the theory of values change on the concepts of scarcity. He argues that people “place the greatest value on those things that are in relatively short supply” (1981, 881). ‘Materialist’ concerns about economic and physical security are desired by the public in times of depression or warfare. Emphasis on ‘Post-materialist values’ such as freedom, self-expression, and quality of life increases as demands for clean drinking water, food, and shelter are met (Abramson and Inglehart 1995). In this regard, values represented beliefs that are derived from human needs gratification (Inglehart 1971).

Information

Type
FEATURES
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 319 - 324
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart. 1995. Value Change in Global Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Edward B., Eric Kuhn, Dianna L. Rowell, Edward J. Hickling, David Wittrock, Rebecca L. Rogers, Michelle R. Johnson, and Debra C. Steckler. 2004. “Studies of the Vicarious Traumatization of College Students by the September 11th Attacks: Effects of Proximity, Exposure and Connectedness.” Behavior Research Therapy 42: 91–205.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hagerty, Michael R. 1997. “Testing Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs: National Quality-of-Life across Time.” Social Indicators Research 46: 249–71.Google Scholar
Galston, W. 2001. “Who's a Liberal?” Public Interest 144: 100–8.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1971. “The Silent Revolution in Europe; Intergenerational Change in Post Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 65: 991–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1981. “Post-materialism in an Environment of Insecurity.” American Political Science Review 75: 880–900.Google Scholar
Karylowski, Jerzy. 1984. “ Focus of Attention and Altruism: Endocentric and Exocentric Sources of Altruistic Behavior.” In Development and Maintenance of Prosocial Behavior: International Perspectives on Positive Morality, eds. Edward Staub, Daniel Bar-Tal, Jerzey Karylowski, and J. Reykowski. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Khalil, Elias L. 2003. A Pure Theory of Altruism. http://home.uchicago.edu/∼elkhalil/alt.pdf. Accessed 8 September, 2003.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham H. 1970. Motivation and Personality, Second Edition. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
Sherrod, Lonnie R., Omar Quiñones, and Carlos Davila. 2004. “Youth's Political Views and Their Experience of September 11, 2001.” Applied Developmental Psychology 25: 149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1759] 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wispé, Lauren G. 1991. The Psychology of Sympathy. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar